ARTICLE

EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TEACHER APPRAISAL SYSTEM IN PUBLIC HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF PUNJAB PAKISTAN

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

22 Pages : 194-208

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).22      10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).22      Published : Mar 2019

Effectiveness of the Teacher Appraisal System in Public Higher Secondary Schools of Punjab (Pakistan)

Abstract

    Quantitative research was conducted to find out the effectiveness of the existing performance appraisal system (PAS). A survey research design was planned to determine the level of awareness of the teachers with the existing teacher appraisal system; moreover, the effectiveness was determined by the level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction of teachers with PAS and its probable effect on teaching practices. A random sampling technique was used to access the target population. A self-constructed questionnaire was distributed among 78 principals of public higher secondary schools and the reliability of the instrument was found to be .862. Step-wise regressions inform us dissatisfaction of teachers is associated with the transparency of the appraisers. Management support and motivation were not found to be significant predictors need for improvement. The results further highlighted that a lack of awareness about PAS negatively affects motivation to perform better. A lot of improvement is needed to make the appraisal process more effective.

    Effectiveness, Performance Appraisal System, Public Higher Secondary School Teachers, School Principals

    (1) Muhammad Nadeem
    PhD Scholar,Department of Education,University of Management & Technology Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Seema Arif
    Assistant Professor,Department of Education,University of Management & Technology Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Muhammad Zaheer Asghar
    Assistant Professor,Department of Education,University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Aguinis, H., (2007). Performance management. Printice Hall. London
  • Akram, M. J. (2010). Factors affecting the performance of teachers at higher secondary level in Punjab (Doctoral dissertation, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan).
  • Arif, S., & Ilyas, M. (2012). Creating a Quality Teaching Learning Environment.International Journal of Learning, 18(6).
  • Bethell, R., (2005), School Evaluation, Teacher appraisal And Feedback And The Impact On Schools And Teachers, Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS - ISBN 978-92-64-05605-3
  • Clark, C. A. (2017). Professional Growth: Informal Peer Observation.
  • Craig, W. (2011). Better teacher appraisal and feedback: improving performance. Grattan Institute. http://www.grattan.edu.au/
  • Cruickshank, D.R,& Haefele, D. (2001).Good teachers, plural. Educational Leadership, 58, 26-30.
  • Danielson, C.& McGreal, T.L. (2000). Teacher evaluation: To Enhance professional practice Alexandria, Va: Association for supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Day, C. (2010). Formas de Avaliacao Docente em Inglaterra: professionalism e Perfomatividade. In M.A. Flores (ed). A Availcao de professores numa Perpectiva Internacional: Sentidos e Implicacoes. Porto: Areal Editores.
  • Dessler, G. (2008). Human Resource Management, (11th Ed), London: Prentice Hall.
  • Fryer, K., Antony, J., & Ogden, S., (2009)
  • Grootenboer, P. (2017). Appraisal for quality learning. Waikato Journal of Education, 6(1).
  • Hallinger, P. (2018). Surfacing a hidden literature: A systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 362-384.
  • Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2008). Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), 101-136
  • Kumrow, D. & Dahlen, B. (2002). Is peer review an effective approach for evaluating teachers? The Clearing House, 75, 238-241.
  • Lam, S., (2001). Educators' opinions on classroom observation as a practice of staff development and appraisal. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17:1-14. Available az . Accessed 2004-01-27. http://wwwsciencedirect.com
  • Lemieux-Charles, L., W. McGuire, F. Champagne, J. Barnsley, D. Cole and C. Sicotte (2003)
  • Monyatsi, P.P., (2006), An investigation of the effectiveness of the school-based workshops approach to staff development in secondary schools in Botswana. Educational Research and Reviews Vol. 1 (5), pp. 150-155, ISSN 1990-3839 © 2006 Academic Journals
  • Murdock, G. (2000). Introducing a teacher-supportive evaluation system. ELT Journal: an InternationalJournal for Teachers of English to Speakers of other Languages, 54:54-64.
  • OECD, (2005), Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers, OECD Publications; 2 rue André Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France
  • Qasim, A. P., Awan, Z. A., & Ansari, J. A. (2016). Critical appraisal of autopsy work. In APMC (Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 194-202).
  • Saunders, R. M., (2000) The Agile Manager's Guide to Effective Performance Appraisals; Velocity Pub, 01- - Business & Economics - 128 pages
  • Stronge, J.H. (2010) O que funciona, de facto, na avaliação de professores: breves considerações. In M.A. Flores (ed.) A Avaliação de Professores numa Perspectiva Internacional: Sentidos e Implicações. Porto: Areal Editores
  • Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2003). Handbook on teacher evaluation: Assessing and. improving performance. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
  • Taut, S., & Sun, Y. (2014). The development and implementation of a national, standards-based, multi-method teacher performance assessment system in Chile. education policy analysis archives, 22, 71.
  • Varkky, B., Koshy, A., & Oburoi, R., (2008),
  • Vaillant, D. (2008) Algunos marcos referenciales en el evaluacion del desempeño docente, Revista Iberoamaricana de Evaluacion Educativa, Vol. 1(2), pp. 7-22.
  • Vanci-Osam U & Aksit T 2000. Do intentions and perceptions always meet? A case study regarding the use of a teacher appraisal scheme in an English language teaching environment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16:1-15. Available at Accessed 2004-01-27. http:///www.sciencedirect.com
  • Wilson J P (2005). Human Resource Development: 2nd edition. Kogan Page. London.
  • Woessmann, L., (2011)

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Nadeem, M., Arif, S., & Asghar, M. Z. (2019). Effectiveness of the Teacher Appraisal System in Public Higher Secondary Schools of Punjab (Pakistan). Global Regional Review, IV(I), 194-208. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).22

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Nadeem, Muhammad, Seema Arif, and Muhammad Zaheer Asghar. 2019. "Effectiveness of the Teacher Appraisal System in Public Higher Secondary Schools of Punjab (Pakistan)." Global Regional Review, IV (I): 194-208 doi: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).22

HARVARD

    HARVARD : NADEEM, M., ARIF, S. & ASGHAR, M. Z. 2019. Effectiveness of the Teacher Appraisal System in Public Higher Secondary Schools of Punjab (Pakistan). Global Regional Review, IV, 194-208.

MHRA

    MHRA : Nadeem, Muhammad, Seema Arif, and Muhammad Zaheer Asghar. 2019. "Effectiveness of the Teacher Appraisal System in Public Higher Secondary Schools of Punjab (Pakistan)." Global Regional Review, IV: 194-208

MLA

    MLA : Nadeem, Muhammad, Seema Arif, and Muhammad Zaheer Asghar. "Effectiveness of the Teacher Appraisal System in Public Higher Secondary Schools of Punjab (Pakistan)." Global Regional Review, IV.I (2019): 194-208 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Nadeem, Muhammad, Arif, Seema, and Asghar, Muhammad Zaheer (2019), "Effectiveness of the Teacher Appraisal System in Public Higher Secondary Schools of Punjab (Pakistan)", Global Regional Review, IV (I), 194-208

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Nadeem, Muhammad, Seema Arif, and Muhammad Zaheer Asghar. "Effectiveness of the Teacher Appraisal System in Public Higher Secondary Schools of Punjab (Pakistan)." Global Regional Review IV, no. I (2019): 194-208. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).22