ARTICLE

CANDIDATES PERSONALITY AND VOTING PREFERENCES IN KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA

04 Pages : 29-42

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).04      10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).04      Published : Mar 2019

Candidates Personality and Voting Preferences in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

    This study tries to find out whether personality of a candidate affects the voters preferences in elections in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa or not? It is believed that like other socio-political and economic preferences, candidates personality is also an important determinant of voting behaviour in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. This paper is an attempt to identify different indicators (Personal Influence, Socio-economic and Political Status in society) of personality vote in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The study is based on empirical data collected from North, Centre and Southern geographical regions of the province through a multi-stage sampling technique. Chi-square test is used for the data analysis.

    Personality, Candidate, Vote, Voting Behaviour, Election, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    (1) Hassan Shah
    Lecturer, Department of Political Science,University of Buner, Buner, KP, Pakistan.
    (2) Zahir Shah
    Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science,Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
    (3) Wajid Mehmood Khattak
    Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, FATA University, Darra Adam Khel, KP, Pakistan.
  • Barnea, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Values and Voting. Political Psychology, 19(1), 17-40.
  • Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery School Personality and Political Orientation two Decades Later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 734-749.
  • Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., Stokes, D. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Caprara, G. V., & Zimbardo, P. (2004). Personalizing Politics: A Congruency Model of Political Preference. American Psychologist, 59, 581-594.
  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1999). Personality Profiles and Political Parties. Political Psychology, 20, 175-197.
  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. (2002). When Parsimony Subdues Distinctiveness: Simplified Public Perceptions of Politicians' Personality. Political Psychology, 23, 77-96.
  • Converse, P. E. (1974). Some Priority Variables in Comparative Electoral Research.
  • Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A Dual-process Cognitive-Motivational Theory of Ideology and Prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41-113.
  • Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual‐process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861-1894.
  • Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Fraley, R. C., Griffin, B. N., Belsky, J., & Roisman, G. I. (2012). Developmental Antecedents of Political Ideology: A Longitudinal Investigation from Birth to Age 18 years. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1425-1431.
  • Giddens, A. (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Oxford: Polity. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26.
  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann Jr, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528.
  • Healy, A., & Malhotra, N. (2013). Childhood Socialization and Political Attitudes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. The Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1023- 1037.
  • Hiel, A. V., & Mervielde, I. (2004). Openness to Experience and Boundaries in the Mind: Relationships with Cultural and Economic Conservative Beliefs. Journal of Personality, 72(4), 659-686.
  • Hobbs, W. R., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2014). Widowhood effects in Voter Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 1-16.
  • Huckfeldt, R. R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge University Press.
  • Iyengar, S., and Kinder, D. R. (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jakopovich, D. (2014). The Concept of Class, Cambridge Studies in Social Research SSRG, 14, 1-27.
  • Jennings, M. K, and Niemi, R. G. (1968). The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 169-84.
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and Research, 2(1999), 102-138.
  • Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated with Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity?. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 33(7), 989-1007
  • Latif, A. Usman, A. Kataria, J. R. Abdullah, M. (2015). Female Political Participation in South Asia: A Case Study of Pakistan, A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 30 (2), 201-213.
  • McClosky, H. (1958). Conservatism and Personality, American Political Science Review, 52, 27-45.
  • McCrae, R. R., Costa Jr, P. T. (1999). A Five-factor Theory of Personality. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2(1999), 139-153.
  • Mehrabian, A. (1996). Relations among Political attitudes, Personality and Psychopathology assessed with new Measures of Libertarianism and Conservatism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18(4), 469- 491.
  • Niemi, R. G., & Jennings, M. K. (1991). Issues and Inheritance in the Formation of Party Identification, American Journal of Political Science, 35, 970-88.
  • Rais, R. B. (1985). Elections in Pakistan: Is Democracy Winning? Asian Affairs: An American Review, 12(3), 43-61.
  • Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2009). The Ideal Politician: Impact of Voters' Ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 60-65.
  • Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press. Tilley, J., & Hobolt, S. B. (2011). Is the Government to Blame? An Experimental Test of how Partisanship shapes Perceptions of Performance and Responsibility, The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 316-330.
  • Vecchione, M., Schoen, H., Castro, J. L. G., Cieciuch, J., Pavlopoulos, V., & Caprara, G. V. (2011). Personality Correlates of Party Preference: The Big Five in Five Big European Countries, Personality and Individual Differences, 51(6), 737-742.
  • Wattenberg, M. P. (1998). The Decline of American Political Parties. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 579-616.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Shah, Hassan, Zahir Shah, and Wajid Mehmood Khattak. 2019. "Candidates Personality and Voting Preferences in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa." Global Regional Review, IV (I): 29-42 doi: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).04
    HARVARD : SHAH, H., SHAH, Z. & KHATTAK, W. M. 2019. Candidates Personality and Voting Preferences in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Global Regional Review, IV, 29-42.
    MHRA : Shah, Hassan, Zahir Shah, and Wajid Mehmood Khattak. 2019. "Candidates Personality and Voting Preferences in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa." Global Regional Review, IV: 29-42
    MLA : Shah, Hassan, Zahir Shah, and Wajid Mehmood Khattak. "Candidates Personality and Voting Preferences in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa." Global Regional Review, IV.I (2019): 29-42 Print.
    OXFORD : Shah, Hassan, Shah, Zahir, and Khattak, Wajid Mehmood (2019), "Candidates Personality and Voting Preferences in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa", Global Regional Review, IV (I), 29-42
    TURABIAN : Shah, Hassan, Zahir Shah, and Wajid Mehmood Khattak. "Candidates Personality and Voting Preferences in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa." Global Regional Review IV, no. I (2019): 29-42. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).04