Abstract

This study is about capacity building and institutional strengthening to increase social resistance. The research applies the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) to weight and rank factors in levels two and three of the framework, which reveals vital characteristics within planning, organization; equipment; education & exercise. This study underlines the importance and centrality relevant to the B2 Disaster Response Plan, B4 District Management Leading Agency, B5 Grass Roots Working Organization (GWO), as well as, B8 District Management Resources. Qualitative insights enhance the complement, recognizing the comprehensiveness of Disaster Risk Assessment (B1) and suggestions for fine-tuning. This paper offers suggestions for further cleanup techniques, and how the results may apply to a wider sample population as described in future research. Results offer a detailed guide for improving efforts to respond and recover after climate disasters.

Key Words

Capacity Building, Institutional Strengthening, Enhancing Social Resilience

Introduction

Climate change is a great global problem exceeding geographical borders and with a significant direct impact on the actions of governments people, ecosystems as well in economy worldwide (IPPC 2021). Climate change involves long-term changes in temperature, precipitation patterns, sea levels, and the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events which are caused by both human-induced processes such as: greenhouse gas emissions from industrial activities like deforestation or burning coal for fuel and also natural phenomena that occur through time such as volcanic eruptions; fluctuations in incoming solar radiation due to variations among seasons/year-long cycles known collectively under an umbrella term "insolation" (IPCC 2021).

Climate change adaptation requires a move from global to regional and national or local scales, which are essential for understanding the locally relevant issues that could scale up into larger solutions at the international level (UNFCCC,2015). This focus on international agreements and high-level policies, such as in the Paris Agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance adaptive capacity (IPCC, 2021) can be criticized for its lack of grounding in local vulnerability or adaptation needs, dubbed problems (Denton et al., 2014).

Transitioning to regional and national context will allow analyzing how the impacts of climate change vary across regions and nations (Kates et al., 2012). Regional climatic features, the availability of resources, and socioeconomic factors altogether determine the consequences of climate change (IPCC, 2014). Thus, South Asian nations, such as Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh, are impacted differently from those in Europe or North America, and their adaptation measures are specific (Adger et al., 2005; Brooks et al., 2005). National governments devise climate policies, set adaptation priorities, and mobilize resources in response to these regional challenges (UNDP, 2020).

As, at the level of community impacts and associated risks due to climate change are felt most directly in which features of a location, such as topography or land use present key factors for understanding vulnerability and capacities for adaptation (Smit et al., 2000). Coastal towns are subject to inundation due to sea-level rise and wave overtopping from storm events, with mountains facing risks associated with landslides as well as glacier retreat (Mimura et al., 2014; Nussbaumer et al., 2019). Climate adaptation is shaped primarily by local forces among those for whom knowledge about their settings and solutions tailored to fit the context of its use are espoused - community leaders, NGOs, and grassroots movements (Ford et al., 2018; Dulal et al., 2016).

Given the significance of local context for successful adaptation, it is important to customize strategies based on community needs and work directly with locals in developing initiatives thereby encouraging ownership and sustainability (Few, et al., 2007; Eriksen, et al., 2015) while also utilizing indigenous knowledge to influence policy at a larger scale. The models of local successful initiatives can be expanded by demonstrating their copy-paste potential and in this manner, contribute to building regional/national resilience against climate-driven shocks (Tanner, et al., 2009; UNDRR, 2019)

Nevertheless, local endeavors should supplement global strategies. Global frameworks offer important goals and commitments on which to base primary responses to mitigate climate change before it happens they guide international cooperation, resource mobilization, and information exchange (Biermann, et al. 2012). For this reason, it is imperative that the global pathways be consolidated with local action lessons (Gupta, et al., 2020). This integrative perspective acknowledges that action and practice at global, regional national, and local levels are interdependent in addressing the complexity of climate change adaptation challenges (Eakin et al., 2019).




Research Questions

What is the role of the effectiveness of capacity building and institutional strengthening policy in building social resilience on institutional and community levels?

Research Objectives

To study the role of the effectiveness of capacity building and institutional strengthening policy in building social resilience on institutional and community levels.

Review of Literature

Climate change is a phenomenon with widespread environmental, economic, and social implications. A key component in mitigation and adaptation is the dual-imperative of understanding climate change risk, coupled with societal resilience. Climate change affects many things, such as temperature; precipitation patterns; sea levels, and the magnitude of extreme weather (IPCC, 2021). "These changes in energy use capacity are at cross-purposes with environmental sustainability, economic stability, and social well-being, leading to likely challenges for food security, water availability' agricultural productivity as well public health, especially among the most vulnerable regions" (Wheeler & Von Braun 2013; Barreca et al. 2016).

Capacity Building and Institutional Strengthening

Climate change adaptation and building resilience are key ingredients to them being able to combat its varied increasing impacts. Capacity-building and the enhancement of organizational capacities are instrumental in this regard, helping people, communities, and organizations more as aptly stated; to climate change (IPCC, 2021).

Climate change adaptation is a very complex phenomenon that requires knowledge, skills training, and enablement to make better use of technology and resources. It involves public awareness, educational programs, and capacity building both at the individual as well as community levels (Agrawala et al., 2005). Such initiatives help to spread the word on climate change and create awareness of how people can act effectively in response. Adaptive capacity will also be enhanced through skill development for employment and economic activity vocational training, and experiential learning (Ministry of Climate Change, 2020).

Institutional capacity building refers to efforts that aim at increasing the capacities, efficiency, and effectiveness of government agencies, NGOs, and other institutions responsible for climate management (Biesbroek et al., 2010). The changes in the governance mechanism, policy frameworks, and practices are essential to strengthen these institutions. Strong policy frameworks and the provision of adequate resources-financial, human, and technical-are essential for good implementation of climate policies as well as programs (Adeel et al., 2021). Institutional development requires adaptive management systems that build flexibility and resilience (Mangala et al., 2020). Transparency and accountability mechanisms facilitate appropriate, inclusive, ethical climate action (Mangala et al., 2020).

The relationship between capacity building and institutional strengthening is quite clear: You can't have one without the other. To achieve this, both competent individuals and sound organizational systems are required; as Biermann et al., (2012) say: "With a staff of an impeachable quality and well-run organizations in place." To suit specific conditions, each region and each community must be treated separately in terms of their special vulnerabilities and requirements (Pelling et al., 2014).

Climate Change Policies and Practices

A comprehensive understanding of climate change adaptation and mitigation measures, one has to look at the policies and practices at every level. Climate change is a global problem in need of coordinated solutions across different geographical areas and political jurisdictions (IPCC, 2021).

International climate change policy is cemented in agreements such as the Paris Agreement. This commits signatories to reducing emissions, improving adaptation, and providing poor countries with financial support (United Nations, 2015). Regional policies, on the other hand, are just more general rules working towards a goal--boosting exchanges and coordinated project methods at locations that face similar vulnerabilities and opportunities from their environments. Such guidelines apply to varying geographic areas (EEA, 2021).

National climate policies and practices include efforts to establish emissions reduction targets, set renewable energy adoption goals, and prepare national climate adaptation plans. The Paris Agreement (UNFCCC, 2021) expands on this type of process by providing for states to outline precisely what they plan to do in the form of nationally determined contributions (NDCs), based on their respective national circumstances. Carbon emissions are generally reduced through sustainable mobility, energy-efficient building policies, and waste management at a local level alongside grassroots responses to climate concerns (Pelling et al., 2014).




A Case of Pakistan

Pakistan remains one of the world's most vulnerable countries to climate change, given our geographical location and inherent socioeconomic characteristics as well as limitations on adaptive capacity (UNDP 2020). The country is in a condition of water scarcity, increasing temperatures as well as experiencing variations in rainfall patterns like durable droughts and intense weather events (IPCC, 2021).

In Pakistan, for example, such efforts include enhanced water management strategies and afforestation programs among other disaster risk reduction initiatives. Ministry of Climate Change leads the policy landscape and there are two important components for that Including National Climate Change Policy & Framework for Climate Policy Implementation (MoCC, 2012) Nevertheless, complexities in policy designs with the implementation still belong to challenges whose sourcing resources and coordination among government ministries remain (Gulzar et al., 2021).

Research Methodology

Qualitative research methods are used for my thesis as this is the choice of the most fitting complex social phenomena and for catching the smallest facets of human life and perception. Since the phenomenon of climate change is complex, and the phenomenon of climate change adaptation is even more so, qualitative research is a perfect choice. It helps to investigate the lives of politicians, professionals, and communities, who aspire to solve the issue. It can be easier to get effective and country-specific data through implementing interviews, focus groups, and document analysis methods. The topic requires a holistic view, which stresses the anthropological approach. An ability to consider capacity building, institutional strengthening, societal resilience, and other critical themes of my research allows perceiving the phenomenon of climate change adaptation as profound and authentic. Furthermore, conducting anthropological qualitative research provides a wide range of opportunities for conducting research and investigating other features of the phenomenon in terms of the surrounding social, cultural, and environmental characteristics. It allows an understanding of climate change adaptation as a deeply socially integrated phenomenon, not merely a technologically oriented cause. It allows us to study how cultural norms, traditions, and social life can impact the phenomenon of climate policies and their implementation.

Results and Discussions

This research is related to the phenomenon of capacity building and institutional strengthening which could contribute to enhancing social resilience against climate change. It is conducted based on in-depth interviews with 20 key stakeholders from various establishments located within the Pakistan Ministry of Climate Change dealing with a response to and managing climate change. The primary goal of the research is to obtain information concerning the phenomenon of capacity building and its impact on social resilience to climate change enabling to make relevant conclusions related to the case. Mainly, the research aims at identifying patterns in the data by defining commonalities and variations in experiences and insights of the main parties involved in the process.

The analysis of the interviews unveiled the key themes that included role and division within the Ministry, alignment with the world, regional work, empowering capacity, social resilience, decarbonization, and the current development, as well as the description of the future. It appears that climate change governance is a rather complex issue requiring an interdisciplinary approach to all of its features. In the present work, the chapter accentuates the importance of national policies aligned with global, and regional assistance and cooperation, and empowerment of all the levels' capacity development.

Finally, the chapter provides a synthesis of lessons learned and practical suggestions for building climate resiliency in public institutions and communities. Such as building strategic partnerships, using technology for training and knowledge sharing, community empowerment, or youth engagement with public awareness. Taken together, the participants provided critical learning on how efforts permeate at both policy and implementation levels reinforcing lessons learned only through flexibility that pools resources with an ongoing spirit of collaboration combined with a pursuit for continuous improvement underpinning sustainable climate resilience.

Roles and Responsibilities in Climate Change Governance: The variety of their roles within the Ministry for Climate Change was representative of what was needed to bring about good governance. Activities include policy development, analysis, research, capacity building, and Indigenous engagement. This diversity emphasizes the necessity of a multi-pronged approach to address climate change problems.

Global Alignment and Regional Collaboration: National policies should be aligned with the global climate challenge (like the Paris Agreement) So the question of how you balance out national and international, which ties into scalable alignment strategies that all discussers brought up. Besides geopolitical tensions and resource disparities, shared climate concerns call for regional coordination.

Capacity Building and Institutional Strengthening: The field of capacity development encompasses a multitude of approaches, including policies and programs that involve several stakeholders, including government agencies, private sector companies, and civil society organizations (CSOs). The key to these projects' progress is flexibility, as models shift from witness and demonstration to more interactive keywords) learning. They achieve things like intent on evolving an environment that is long-lasting and ecological, boosting teamwork, and enabling the neighborhood.

Social Resilience and Climate Adaptation: Constructing ability is important to fostering social spirit because it enables people and encourages an easygoing way of thinking. Experimental examples validate how enhanced capabilities lead to improved social resilience and better preparation for climate-related disasters. The active relationship between social resilience and capacity building produces an optimistic feedback loop that supports general climate adaptation efforts.

Climate Policy Implementation: Contribution at all stages is required to interpret determined climate goals into normal initiatives. While challenges such as limited resources, opposing stakeholder determinations, and the need for ongoing valuation hamper progress, these matters can be overcome with creative thinking and regular regional cooperation. Numerous approaches and shared impediments are exposed by an exploration of efforts conducted in South Asia and beyond, stressing the significance of willing interchange and flexible reform. Smaller sentences that just state the essential nuances can be used in combination with longer ones that are jam-packed with details and comparisons.

Key Takeaways and Recommendations: This provides an impression of the key outcomes from the research that was carried out, but it is central to emphasize how significant it is to have responsive governance, public contribution, and continuing skill development. Developing thoughtful partnerships, integrating new ideas into learning programs, permitting local authority, and placing a high value on the assistance and social morality of young people are all possible remedies. These contracts provide an outline for future initiatives relating to the administration of climate change and enhancing communities' ability to adapt.

Conclusion

The mutual findings of this in-depth analysis not only contribute to a multifaceted understanding of climate change governance, capacity improvement, and institutional strengthening but also highlight significant understandings shared by the contributors who were involved with the study across regions. This is one of the key messages from our APN-IHG grant that illustrates climate resilience as a moving target, intertwined with different restrictions and opened by chances for adaptive actions. Complementing this, the study built on understanding challenges related to positioning national policies to global imperatives and navigating regional collaboration landscapes engrained in tension-driven geopolitics whilst repeating the importance of responding through community GIS initiatives. Through this reflection on themes, a mosaic of climate change governance takes shape which is integrative and indicative of macro-micro relationships.

Recommendations

Based on what we learned from participants, several recommendations emerge to strengthen climate change governance and adaptation. Policymakers should be adaptive, and policies responsive to the changing climate landscape. Sustained diplomatic work to build trust and goodwill between neighbors will also be needed for the long haul if regional collaboration is going in earnest to address our shared climate challenges. One of the recommendations that comes from this in the area of capacity building is greater emphasis on community empowerment, where programs are designed to answer local needs and a wide range of political voices should be involved; They propose innovative mechanisms in policy implementation to beat resource constraints and issues in coordination that allow policies to be effectively translated into practices.

Implications

This has significant policy, practice, and research implications for climate change governance. This knowledge can be used by policymakers to help design and review the periodicity of policies so that they are fit for purpose in a constantly changing state space. The descriptive power of empowerment and active community participation in the study can be utilized as an essential priority to inform practitioners who should advocate for more robust, context-driven care with a focus on grassroots capacity building. The identified multi-faceted challenges are interesting areas of inter-disciplinary collaboration that researchers can leverage, to help tackle the problem with a holistic and integrated approach towards climate resilience.




Limitations

It is always important to keep in mind the limitations of research. Although the sample size is broad, it may mean that not all climate change governance contexts are covered in entirety; hence we advise against generalization of these findings. Although the researchers did their best to make study participants' responses transparent and in-depth, this approach inevitably carries some inherent biases or missed nuances present in factors that were not accounted for.




Future Studies

Future investigations could take into consideration 

the following to move our understanding of climate change governance and adaptation forward. The policy and program evolution over time along with the longer-term effectiveness of climate change governance could be better understood via longitudinal analyses. Such comparative cross-regional studies could reveal regional differences which, in return can help with interregional learning as well as cooperation. Deep, qualitative analysis of the policy implementation bottlenecks might help identify its more discrete barriers to improvement.




Summary 

This study provides an initial contribution to the dialogue on climate resilience. Adopting the recommendations, by being realistic about where there remain limitations and setting out future research paths enforcement can begin to make a key difference in addressing challenges of climate change confrontation with more adaptable application that involves all stakeholders.

References

• Adeel, Z., Mahmood, A., & Malhi, Y. (2021). A case study of the impact of climate change on infrastructure in Pakistan. Climate Risk Management, 32, 100292.

• Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005 
• Barreca, A., Clay, K., Deschenes, O., Greenstone, M., & Shapiro, J. S. (2016). Adapting to Climate Change: The Remarkable Decline in the US Temperature-Mortality Relationship over the Twentieth Century. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 105–159. https://doi.org/10.1086/684582 
• Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M. M., Bulkeley, H., Cashore, B., Clapp, J., Folke, C., Gupta, A., Gupta, J., Haas, P. M., Jordan, A., Kanie, N., Kluvankova-Oravska, T., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Meadowcroft, J., . . . Zondervan, R. (2012). Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance. Science, 335(6074), 1306–1307. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217255 
• Biesbroek, G. R., Swart, R. J., Carter, T. R., Cowan, C., Henrichs, T., Mela, H., Morecroft, M. D., & Rey, D. (2010). Europe adapts to climate change: Comparing National Adaptation Strategies. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005
• Denton, F., Wilbanks, T., Abeysinghe, A., Burton, I., Gao, Q., Lemos, M. C., ... & Rahman, A. (2014). Climate-resilient pathways: adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (pp. 1101-1131). IPCC.
• Eakin, H., Appendini, K., Sweeney, S., Perales, H., & Shelton, R. (2019). Gender, maize, and climate adaptation in Mexico. World Development, 122, 38-51.
• EEA. (2021). Climate Change, Impacts and Vulnerabilities in Europe.
• Few, R., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2007). Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Climate Policy, 7(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2007.9685637 
• Gulzar, S., Ghazi, I.  A., & Arif, I.  (2021).  Institutional Arrangements and Implementation of Climate Change Policy in Pakistan:  An Analysis. Environmental Policy and Governance, 1-13.
• Gupta, J., Baud, I., de Pinto, A., & de Soysa, I. (2020). Inclusive responses to COVID-19 and climate change. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 533-536.
• IPCC.  (2014).  Climate Change 2014:  Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.  https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/  
• IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
• Kates, R. W., Travis, W. R., & Wilbanks, T. J. (2012). Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(19), 7156–7161. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115521109 
• Mimura, N. (2013). Sea-level rise caused by climate change and its implications for society. Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and Biological Sciences, 89(7), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.2183/pjab.89.281 
• Pelling, M., O’Brien, K., & Matyas, D. (2014). Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change, 133(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0 
• Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R., & Street, R. (1999). The science of adaptation: A framework for assessment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4(3/4), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009652531101 
• Tanner, T., Mitchell, T., Polack, E., & Guenther, B. (2009). Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing climate change resilience in ten Asian cities. IDS Working Paper, 2009(315), 01–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2009.00315_2.x 
• UNDP. (2020). Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier—Human Development and the Anthropocene. Retrieved from  http://hdr.undp.org/en/2020-report  
• UNFCCC. (2015). The Paris Agreement.  https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf   
• and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris agreement
• UNFCCC. (2021). Capacity-building. https://unfccc.int/topics/capacitybuilding/what-is-capacity-building .