Corporate Governance as a Determinant of Stock Price Synchronicity: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan
The objective of this study is to investigate the association of investor protection (IP) and stock price synchronicity (SPS). Based on the theory that a strong IP reduces information asymmetry (IA) and enhances the quality of firm fundamental information through disclosures of annual reports. Such information is then considered for investment decisions. SPS is measured by Co-movement of majority of share prices in either direction in a stock market, while IP is proxied by Size of the Board of Directors, ratio of the independent directors to total size, and audit committee. Data has been downloaded from State Bank of Pakistan, Companies web sites, and Pakistan Stock Exchange for the period 2010-17. Using panel data analysis techniques, results show that IP and SPS are negatively related. These findings suggest that companies with strong IP help in reducing IA and thus increase the use of FFIs for investment purposes.
-
Stock Price Synchronicity, Corporate Governance, Investor Protection, Board Size, Independent Directors, Audit Committee, Disclosure
-
(1) Adnan Ahmad
Assistant Professor, IBL,Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
(2) Humera Manzoor
Assistant Professor,IMS,Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat, KP, Pakistan.
(3) Muhammad Ibrahim Khan
Assistant Professor, IBL,Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
- Adams, R., Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (2010). The role of Board of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework & Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58-107.
- Adeyemi, B. (2013). Role of Audit Committee in Corporate Governance. Retrieved From http://businessdayonline.com/.../role-of-auditcommittee-in-corporate-governance
- Ali, A., &Nasir, S. (2014). Impact of Board characteristics and Audit committee on Financial performance: A study of manufacturing study of Pakistan. Journal of Finance & Accounting, 5(7), 144-152.
- Alzoubi, E., &Selamat, M. (2012). The effectiveness of CG mechanism on Constraining Earning Management: literature review & proposed framework. International Journal of Global Business, 5(1),17-35.
- Ashbaug, H., Gassen, J., &LaFond, R. (2005).Does Stock Price Synchronicity represent Represent firm specific information? The real evidence
- Bahmani, D. (2014). The relation between Disclosure Quality & information asymmetry: Empirical evidence from Iran. International Journal of financial research, 5(2).
- Barros, P., Boubaker, S., &Hamrouni, A. (2013). Corporate Governance & Voluntary Disclosure in France. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 29 (2), 110-114.
- Bond, J.K. (2009). Cooperative Financial performance and Board of Directors Characteristics: A quantitative investigation. Journal of Cooperatives, (22), 22-44
- Chukwunedu, O., &Ogochukwu, O. (2014). Board effectiveness and Audit Quality in Nigeria: A perspective study. International Journal of Management Science, 2(9), 406-417.
- Cohen, J., Krisshnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2004). The Corporate Governance Mosaic & Financial reporting quality.Journal of Accounting Literature, 87-152.
- Elbadry, A., Gounopoulos, D., Skinner, F. (2014). Governance Quality & information Asymmetry.Economics & Finance, 14-12.
- Gillani, U. ( 2010). Relationship between economic growth and stock market Development.African Journal of business management, 4, 3473- 3479.
- Gordon, J. (2007). The rise of Independent Directors in US, 1950-2005: shareholders Value & stock market prices.Coloumbia Law & Economics working paper series, 59(323).
- Guest, (2009).The impact of board size on firm performance. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385-404.
- Gul, F., Kim, J., &Qiu, A. (2010). Ownership Concentration, Foreign Shareholding, Audit quality, & stock price Synchronicity: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Economics.
- Hermalin, B., &Weisbach, M. (2006).A Framework for assessing CG reforms. NBER Working paper, 12050.Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12050.
- Hossain, D..&Rahman, A. (2006). Audit Committee: A summary of findings of some Existing Literature. The cost and management, 34(5), 40-57. Jaeger, J., (2012).The evolving role of Internal Audit. Retrieved from www.complianceweek.com/news/.../the-evolving-role-ofinternal-audit
- Kilika, S., & Mutua, N. (2013). A survey of role of Audit Committee in promoting Corporate Governance and accountability in Constituency Development fund Management: A case Study of Nairobi, Kenya. International Journal of finance & Banking Studies, 2(3).
- Klazema, A. (2014). The importance of Corporate Governance. Retrieved from https://www.udemy.com/blog/importance-of-corporategovernance.
- Lawal, B. (2012). Board Dynamics and Corporate Performance: review of literature and Empirical challenges. International Journal of Economics & Finance, 4(1).
- Lipman, L., &Lipman, J. (2006). Why is Corporate Governance important? Retrieved From http://accounting.smartpros.com/x55104.xml
- Mohiuddin, MD., & Karbhari, Y. (2010). Audit Committee Effectiveness: a critical Literature Review. AIUB Journal of Business & Economics, 9 (1), 97-125.
- Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of Stock Markets: why Do Emerging Markets have Synchronous Stock Price Movements? Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 215-260.
- Neri, L., & Russo, A. (2014). A Framework for Audit Quality: Critical Analysis. Business and Management Review, 3(09), 25-30.
- Oluitan, R., & Henry, A. (2013). The impact of Capital Market in Development of Nigeria. Journal in Organizational Psychology & Educational Studies, 2(5), 267- 270.
- Shaiban, M., &Saleh, Z. (2010). The impact of Information Intermediaries on Stock Price Synchronicity. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 3(2), 1- 29.
- Sori, Z., Ramadili, S., &Karbhari, Y. (2009). Audit Committee & Auditor Independence: The bankers perception. International Journal of Economics and Management, 3(2), 313-331.
- Turley, S., &Zaman, M. (2004).The Corporate Governance Effects of Audit committee. Journal of Management & Governance, (8), 305-332.
Cite this article
-
APA : Ahmad, A., Manzoor, H., & Khan, M. I. (2017). Corporate Governance as a Determinant of Stock Price Synchronicity: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan. Global Regional Review, II(I), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2017(II-I).20
-
CHICAGO : Ahmad, Adnan, Humera Manzoor, and Muhammad Ibrahim Khan. 2017. "Corporate Governance as a Determinant of Stock Price Synchronicity: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan." Global Regional Review, II (I): 289-304 doi: 10.31703/grr.2017(II-I).20
-
HARVARD : AHMAD, A., MANZOOR, H. & KHAN, M. I. 2017. Corporate Governance as a Determinant of Stock Price Synchronicity: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan. Global Regional Review, II, 289-304.
-
MHRA : Ahmad, Adnan, Humera Manzoor, and Muhammad Ibrahim Khan. 2017. "Corporate Governance as a Determinant of Stock Price Synchronicity: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan." Global Regional Review, II: 289-304
-
MLA : Ahmad, Adnan, Humera Manzoor, and Muhammad Ibrahim Khan. "Corporate Governance as a Determinant of Stock Price Synchronicity: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan." Global Regional Review, II.I (2017): 289-304 Print.
-
OXFORD : Ahmad, Adnan, Manzoor, Humera, and Khan, Muhammad Ibrahim (2017), "Corporate Governance as a Determinant of Stock Price Synchronicity: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan", Global Regional Review, II (I), 289-304
-
TURABIAN : Ahmad, Adnan, Humera Manzoor, and Muhammad Ibrahim Khan. "Corporate Governance as a Determinant of Stock Price Synchronicity: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan." Global Regional Review II, no. I (2017): 289-304. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2017(II-I).20