COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN FEDERATION AND FEDERALISM

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).33      10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).33      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : MuhammadTariq

33 Pages : 300-307

References

  • AlIFF, S. M. (2015). New Trends and Models in Federalism. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSRJHSS) , 20 (11), 76.
  • Benjamin, S. O. (2004). Federal State and State- State Relations in Nigeria: A Case Study of Lagos State.
  • Bryce, J. (1929). Modern Democracies. London : Macmillan and Co. .
  • Bulmer, E. (2015). Federalism . The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA)
  • Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism, Theory and Practice. Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA .
  • Burgess, M. (2006). Compasrative Federalism: Theory and Practice. New York, USA: Routledge (Taylors and Francis Group).
  • Cornell, S. E. (2002).
  • Crawford, J. (1979). The Creation of States in International Law. London: Clarendon Press.
  • Dosenrode, S. (2010).
  • Elazer, D. J. (1995). Federalism: An Overview . Human Science Research Council (HSRC) , 6
  • Frankel, M. (1986). Federal Theory . Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations (ANU). , 241-270.
  • Gagnon, A. (1993). Comparative Federalism and Federations. London: Harvest Printing Press .
  • Ghai, Y. (2000). Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Competiting Claims in Multi-ethnic States. 8.
  • Haq, M. u. (1985). PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OR THEORY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE. 239. BOOKLAND PUBLISHERS & BOOKSELLERS 17. URDU BAZAR LAHORE.
  • Ikelegbe, A. (2004). Intergovernmental Relations, Government and Development in Nigeria
  • King, P. (1982). Federalism and Federation. Baltimore : John Hopkins University Press.
  • Lapidoth, R. E. (1997). Autonomy: Flexible Solution to Ethnic Politics . 29.
  • Law, J. (2013). How can we define federalism, http://www.onfederalsim.ed/attachments/169_download.pd
  • Livingston, W. S. (1956). Federalism and Constitutional Change. London : Oxford University Press.
  • Loughlin, J. (2007).
  • Loughlin, J. (2007).
  • Obi, E. (2019). The Theory, Practice and Current Trends in Federalism . Journal of Social Service and Welfare , 1 (1), 10.
  • Romney, P. (1888). Getting it Wrong: How Canadians forgot their Pastand Imperilled Confederation. 272. Toronto: University of Toronto.
  • Sharada, R. (1984). Federalism Today . New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.
  • Sharma, B. M. (1955). Federalism in Theory and Practice. 10. Chanduari: Bhargava and Sons.
  • Shodhganga. (2015, July 7). Federalism: A Theoretical Perspective. Retrieved from shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/98721/8/08_chapter 2.pdf.
  • Tariq, M. (2018). An Analysis of Major Theories of Federalism . Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR) , III (IV), 400-412.
  • Tariq, M. (2018). Prospects of Federalism in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR) , 356-364.These Thirteen States were: New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Noth Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. . (n.d.).
  • Umbach, M. (2002). German Federalism: Past, Present and Future. New York: Palgrav-Macmillan Publications.
  • Verma, L. S. (1986). Federal Authority in the Indian Political System. 1.
  • Watts, R. L. (2008). Comparing Federal Systems. London: Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  • Wiberg, M. (1998). Political Autonomy: Applications and Implications . 43.
  • Wright, R. (1962). Federalism: origin, Operation, Significance.
  • AlIFF, S. M. (2015). New Trends and Models in Federalism. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSRJHSS) , 20 (11), 76.
  • Benjamin, S. O. (2004). Federal State and State- State Relations in Nigeria: A Case Study of Lagos State.
  • Bryce, J. (1929). Modern Democracies. London : Macmillan and Co. .
  • Bulmer, E. (2015). Federalism . The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA)
  • Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism, Theory and Practice. Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA .
  • Burgess, M. (2006). Compasrative Federalism: Theory and Practice. New York, USA: Routledge (Taylors and Francis Group).
  • Cornell, S. E. (2002).
  • Crawford, J. (1979). The Creation of States in International Law. London: Clarendon Press.
  • Dosenrode, S. (2010).
  • Elazer, D. J. (1995). Federalism: An Overview . Human Science Research Council (HSRC) , 6
  • Frankel, M. (1986). Federal Theory . Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations (ANU). , 241-270.
  • Gagnon, A. (1993). Comparative Federalism and Federations. London: Harvest Printing Press .
  • Ghai, Y. (2000). Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Competiting Claims in Multi-ethnic States. 8.
  • Haq, M. u. (1985). PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OR THEORY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE. 239. BOOKLAND PUBLISHERS & BOOKSELLERS 17. URDU BAZAR LAHORE.
  • Ikelegbe, A. (2004). Intergovernmental Relations, Government and Development in Nigeria
  • King, P. (1982). Federalism and Federation. Baltimore : John Hopkins University Press.
  • Lapidoth, R. E. (1997). Autonomy: Flexible Solution to Ethnic Politics . 29.
  • Law, J. (2013). How can we define federalism, http://www.onfederalsim.ed/attachments/169_download.pd
  • Livingston, W. S. (1956). Federalism and Constitutional Change. London : Oxford University Press.
  • Loughlin, J. (2007).
  • Loughlin, J. (2007).
  • Obi, E. (2019). The Theory, Practice and Current Trends in Federalism . Journal of Social Service and Welfare , 1 (1), 10.
  • Romney, P. (1888). Getting it Wrong: How Canadians forgot their Pastand Imperilled Confederation. 272. Toronto: University of Toronto.
  • Sharada, R. (1984). Federalism Today . New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.
  • Sharma, B. M. (1955). Federalism in Theory and Practice. 10. Chanduari: Bhargava and Sons.
  • Shodhganga. (2015, July 7). Federalism: A Theoretical Perspective. Retrieved from shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/98721/8/08_chapter 2.pdf.
  • Tariq, M. (2018). An Analysis of Major Theories of Federalism . Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR) , III (IV), 400-412.
  • Tariq, M. (2018). Prospects of Federalism in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR) , 356-364.These Thirteen States were: New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Noth Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. . (n.d.).
  • Umbach, M. (2002). German Federalism: Past, Present and Future. New York: Palgrav-Macmillan Publications.
  • Verma, L. S. (1986). Federal Authority in the Indian Political System. 1.
  • Watts, R. L. (2008). Comparing Federal Systems. London: Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  • Wiberg, M. (1998). Political Autonomy: Applications and Implications . 43.
  • Wright, R. (1962). Federalism: origin, Operation, Significance.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Tariq, Muhammad. 2020. "Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism." Global Regional Review, V (I): 300-307 doi: 10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).33
    HARVARD : TARIQ, M. 2020. Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism. Global Regional Review, V, 300-307.
    MHRA : Tariq, Muhammad. 2020. "Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism." Global Regional Review, V: 300-307
    MLA : Tariq, Muhammad. "Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism." Global Regional Review, V.I (2020): 300-307 Print.
    OXFORD : Tariq, Muhammad (2020), "Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism", Global Regional Review, V (I), 300-307