References

• Ali, I., Akhter, N., & Nawaz, M. (2017). Critical analysis of general science textbooks for inclusion of the nature of science used at the elementary level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Journal of Educational Research, 20(1), 113- 131.
• Bailin, S. (2002). Critical thinking and science education. Science & Education, 11, 361-375.
• Bhatti, A. J., Jumani, N. B., & Bilal, M. (2015). Analysis of alignment between curriculum and biology textbook at secondary level in Punjab. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 35(1), 261- 272.
• Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (2007). Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1847-1868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690601159407
• Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43– 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
• Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing Nature of Science Instruction in Socioscientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289–2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582
• Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37, 165-184. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
• Etkina, E., Murthy, S., & Zou, X. (2006). Using introductory labs to engage students in experimental design. American Journal of Physics, 74(11), 979-986. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2238885
• Gresch, H., Hasselhorn, M. and Bögeholz, S. (2013) ‘Training in Decision-making Strategies: An approach to enhance students’ competence to deal with socio-scientific issues’, International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), pp. 2587–2607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.617789
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28– 54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
• Hsu, J. L., Sung, R. J., Swarat, S. L., Gore, A. J., Kim, S., & Lo, S. M. (2024). Variations in Student Approaches to Problem Solving in Undergraduate Biology Education. CBE life sciences education, 23(2), ar12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.23-02-0033
• Ibitoye, T. M. (2021). Project-based learning and self-regulatory strategies as determinants of secondary school student achievement, attitude and practical skills in Biology concepts in Ibadan, Nigeria
• Jackson, K., Bazeley, P., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage
• Kyngäs, H. (2020). Qualitative research and content analysis. In The application of content analysis in nursing science research (pp. 3-11).
• Liang, Y., & Cobern, W. W. (2013). Analysis of a typical Chinese high school biology textbook using the AAAS textbook standards. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(4), 329-336.
• Liu, W. (2023). Critical Thinking Skills for Chinese Teachers: A Study of Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 7(2), 01-16. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2023.72.0116
• Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. In Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 365– 380). Springer. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
• Naseer, H., Muhammad, Y., & Jamil, M. (2022). Critical thinking skills in Pakistan studies textbook: Qualitative content analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 4(3), 744-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v4i03.764
• Quitadamo, I. J., Faiola, C. L., Johnson, J. E., & Kurtz, M. J. (2008). Community-based inquiry improves critical thinking in general education biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(3), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1187%2Fcbe.07-11-0097
• Sabri, S. (2019). The Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on the Development of High School Biology Students' Critical Thinking Skills in the UAE The British University in Dubai (BUiD).
• Silver, C., & Woolf, N. H. (2015). From guided instruction to facilitation of learning: the development of Five-level QDA as a CAQDAS pedagogy that explicates the practices of expert users. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(5), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1062626
• Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle‐ school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538-568. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20019
• Tufail, M., Ali, R., & Malik, S. (2016). Analysis of textbook of biology for higher secondary students with reference to 21st century life skills. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 4(2), 197-213.
• Vieira, R.M., Tenreiro-Vieira, C., & Martins, I. (2011). Critical thinking: Conceptual clarification and its importance in science education. Science Education International, 22, 43-54
• Zorluoglu, S. L., Kizilaslan, A., & Yapucuoglu, M. D. (2020). The Analysis of 9th Grade Chemistry Curriculum and Textbook According to Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(1), 9-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i1.3516