Role of University-Industry Linkages and Its Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Pakistan
This paper analyses the barriers to University-Industry linkages in Pakistan and the significance of these linkages towards innovation outcomes of the firms. We used primary data collected by a questionnaire survey named "innovation survey 2013- 2014"from 200 firms (manufacturing/services) of Pakistan. Inspiration of the study has been taken from the theoretical grounds of the national innovation system and its major innovation players, i.e. universities, firms, govt. And research institutions. Two out of four institution shave been studied in this research work, i.e., universities and industries, to address the first research objective examining the significance of University-Industry linkages towards innovation. The second research objective focuses upon the barriers to University-Industry Linkages and their impact on creating these linkages. Another contribution to the innovation literature has been made by studying the barriers towards this collaboration is a major focus of our analyses. Research methodology is based upon the Pr-obit regression function to study the effect of barriers to U-I linkages on the university-industry relationship and the role of these linkages for a firm's innovative performance.Our findings conclude that top manager reluctance is the most significant barrier towards the U-I linkages. Moreover, our analysis reveals that firms, which are engaged in collaborative arrangements with academia, are more innovative
-
Absorptive Capacity; University-industry Linkages; Innovation Players
-
(1) Tahira Waryyam
PhD Scholar/Faculty Member, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
(2) Bilal Mirza
Associate Professor, Faculty of Business Administration, Iqra University Islamabad, Pakistan
(3) Abdul Waheed
Assistant Professor, Business School, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
- Allen, T. J. (1977)."Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R and D organization."
- Albuquerque, Eduardo, M. (2001). "Scientific infrastructure and catching-up process: notes about a relationship illustrated by science and technology statistics." Revista brasileira de economia 55(4), 545-566.
- Arza, Va. (2010). "Channels, benefits, and risks of public-private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual frameworkinspired by Latin America." Science and Public Policy 37(7), 473- 484.
- Atun, R., Shabbar, J., Sania, N., Felicia, M. K., Mauricio, L., Barreto, M., Nyirenda, N. B., & Peter, P. (2013). "Improving responsiveness of health systems to non-communicable diseases." The Lancet 381(9867), 690-697.
- Alshamaila, Y., Savvas, P., & Feng, L. (2013). "Cloud computing adoption by SMEs in the north east of England: A multi-perspective framework." Journal of Enterprise Information Management 26(3), 250-275.
- Boccanfuso, A. M. (2010). "Why university-industry partnerships matter." Science translational medicine 2(51), 125-515.
- Bruneel, J., Pablo, d’Este, & Ammon, S. (2010). "Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration." Research Policy 39(7), 858-868.
- Bekkers, R., & Freitas, I. M. B. (2008). "Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?" Research Policy 37(10), 1837-1853.
- Bresnahan, T. F., & Manuel, T. (1995). "General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?" Journal ofEconometrics 65(1), 83-108.
- Chung, S. (2002). "Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems." Tec novation 22(8), 485-491.
- Liu, X., & Steven, W. (2001). "Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context." Research Policy 307, 1091-1114.
- Cohen, W. M., & Daniel, A. L. (1990). "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation." Administrative science quarterly: 128-
- Cooke, P., Mikel, G. U., & Goio, E. (1997). "Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizationaldimensions." Research Policy 26(4- 5), 475-491.
- Coccia, M. (2008). "Measuring scientific performance of public research units for strategic change." Journal ofInformatics 2(3), 183- 194.
- D’Este, P., & Pari, P. (2007)."University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?" Research Policy 36(9), 1295-1313.
- Etzkowitz, H., & James, D. (2008). "Rethinking development: circulation in the triple helix." Technology Analysis &Strategic Management 20(6), 653-666.
- Fagerberg, J. (2003)."Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature." Journal ofevolutionary economics 13(2), 125-159.
- Fagerberg, J., Martin, S., & Bart, V. (2010). "Innovation and economic development." Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 2, 833- 872.
- Feinson, S. (2003)."National innovation systems overview and country casesâ€. Knowledge flows and knowledge collectives:understanding the role of science and technology policies in development 13(1), 1- 280.
- Freitas, Bodas, I. M., Aldo, G., & Federica, R. (2013). "Finding the right partners: Institutional and personal modesof governance of university- industry interactions." Research Policy 42(1), 50- 62.
- Freeman, C. (1995). "The ‘National System of Innovation’in historical perspective." Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1), 5-24.
- Geisler, E., & Albert, H. R. (1989). "University- industry relations: A review of major issues." Cooperative researchand development: The industry- university-government relationship: 43-64.
- Greenstein, F. I., Nelson, W., & Polsby, e. (1975). Handbook of political science, Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
- Godin, B. (2006)."The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analyticalframework." Science,Technology, & Human Values 31(6), 639-667.
- Rip, A., & Barend, J. R., Van, d. M. (1996). "The post-modern research system." Science and public policy 23(6), 343-352.
- Godin, B. (2006). "The knowledge-based economy: conceptual framework or buzzword?" The Journal of technologytransfer 31(1), 17-30.
- Greitzer, E. M. J. A., Pertuze, E. S. C., & William, A. L. (2010). "Best practices for industry- universitycollaboration." MIT Sloan Management Review 51(4), 1- 83.
Cite this article
-
APA : Waryyam, T., Mirza, B., & Waheed, A. (2021). Role of University-Industry Linkages and Its Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Pakistan. Global Regional Review, VI(II), 126-144. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).16
-
CHICAGO : Waryyam, Tahira, Bilal Mirza, and Abdul Waheed. 2021. "Role of University-Industry Linkages and Its Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Pakistan." Global Regional Review, VI (II): 126-144 doi: 10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).16
-
HARVARD : WARYYAM, T., MIRZA, B. & WAHEED, A. 2021. Role of University-Industry Linkages and Its Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Pakistan. Global Regional Review, VI, 126-144.
-
MHRA : Waryyam, Tahira, Bilal Mirza, and Abdul Waheed. 2021. "Role of University-Industry Linkages and Its Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Pakistan." Global Regional Review, VI: 126-144
-
MLA : Waryyam, Tahira, Bilal Mirza, and Abdul Waheed. "Role of University-Industry Linkages and Its Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Pakistan." Global Regional Review, VI.II (2021): 126-144 Print.
-
OXFORD : Waryyam, Tahira, Mirza, Bilal, and Waheed, Abdul (2021), "Role of University-Industry Linkages and Its Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Pakistan", Global Regional Review, VI (II), 126-144
-
TURABIAN : Waryyam, Tahira, Bilal Mirza, and Abdul Waheed. "Role of University-Industry Linkages and Its Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Pakistan." Global Regional Review VI, no. II (2021): 126-144. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).16