ARTICLE

IMPACT OF MOTIVATION ON STUDENTS AND TEACHERS EFFICIENCY AND SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS IN PAKISTAN

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

19 Pages : 171-178

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-III).19      10.31703/grr.2019(IV-III).19      Published : Sep 2019

Impact of Motivation on Students' and Teachers' Efficiency and School Effectiveness in Pakistan

Abstract

    The purpose of conducting this research was to study the impact of motivation on teachers and students efficiency and school effectiveness. It was a descriptive study which had a sample of 60 government high schools situated in urban and rural area of District Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan. Self-administrative questionnaires comprising 30 statements were used to collect data from 240 randomly selected teachers and students. The results of the analysis recognized that students and teachers have strong impact on their own efficiency and school effectiveness whereas parental choice is also affected by this. By keeping in mind the conclusions the research recommended; seminars and awareness campaign on psychological strength and social values may be conducted, Missing facilities possibly be identified, proper allocation of budget from governmentand easy access to available facilities may be made sure by school administration.

    Motivation, Efficiency, Effectiveness, Physical Factors, Academic Factors, Social Factors, Psychological Factors

    (1) Muhammad Attique
    Head Master,Department of Education,The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Shahid Hussain
    Head Master,Department of Education,The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Akhtar Ali
    Professor,Department of Education,The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Alsuiadi, F. A. (2015). Study of factors affecting parental choice of private and public school in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hull).
  • Alsuiadi, F. A. (2016). Reasons influencing selection decision making of parental choice of school. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1), 201-211.
  • Andrabi, T., Bau, N., Das, J., &Khwaja, A. I. (2010). Are bad public schools public
  • Bana, Z. (2014). Navigating with trust: A proposal for transforming public sector schools towards learning organizations in Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 8(1), 17.
  • Barber, M. (2013). The good news from Pakistan. Reform Research Trust, 33.
  • Barr, J., & Saltmarsh, S. (2014).
  • Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human development, 49(4), 193-224.
  • Beckett, L. S. (2015). An investigation into the factors that influence parental choice of early education and care (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).
  • Buckingham, J. (2000). The truth about private schools in Australia. Centre for Independent Studies.
  • Buckley, J., & Schneider, M. (2004). Charter schools as a tool to reform local schools by transforming governance. Metropolitan governance, 183-211.
  • Buckley, J., & Schneider, M. (2006). Are charter school parents more satisfied with schools? Evidence from Washington, DC. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 57-78.
  • Delaney, P. P. (2008). What do parents want? Factors affecting parental decisions in charter school enrollment (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech).
  • Dev, M. (2016). Factors Affecting the Academic Achievement: A Study of Elementary School Students of NCR Delhi, India. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(4), 70-74.
  • Dilshad, R. M. (2010). Assessing Quality of Teacher Education: A Student Perspective. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 30(1).
  • Goldring, E. B., &Hausman, C. S. (1999). Reasons for parental choice of urban schools. Journal of Education Policy, 14(5), 469-490.
  • Gross, B., & DeArmond, M. (2010). How do charter schools compete for teachers? A local perspective. Journal of School Choice, 4(3), 254-277.
  • Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Rivkin, S. G., & Branch, G. F. (2007). Charter school quality and parental decision making with school choice. Journal of public economics, 91(5-6), 823-848.
  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2001). A capital theory of school effectiveness and improvement [1]. British educational research journal, 27(4), 487-503.
  • HartsellSr, J. H. (2011). Factors affecting private school choice.
  • Hasnat, M. A. (2016). Parents' perception of their involvement in schooling activities: a case study from rural secondary schools in Bangladesh. Studiapaedagogica, 21(4), 137-149.
  • Holcombe, W. L., Lee, W. N., Inchauste, V., & Schexnayder, D. Parent Satisfaction with School Quality: Evidence from One Texas District Toni Falbo Robert W. Glover S. Lynne Stokes
  • Holmes, G. M., DeSimone, J., & Rupp, N. G. (2006). Does school choice increase school quality? Evidence from North Carolina charter schools. In Improving School Accountability (pp. 131-155). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Holyoke, T. T. (2008). Dimensions of charter school choice. Journal of School Choice, 2(3), 302-317.
  • Hsu, Y., & Yuan-fang, C. (2013). An analysis of factors affecting parents' choice of a junior high school. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 3(2), 39-49.
  • Jackson, C., & Bisset, M. (2005). Gender and school choice: Factors influencing parents when choosing single‐ sex or co‐educational independent schools for their children. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 195- 211.
  • Lopez, A., Wells, A. S., & Holme, J. J. (2002). Identity building, diversity, and selectivity. Where charter school policy fails: The problems of accountability and equity, 12, 129.
  • Loveless, T. (2002). Charter School Achievement and Accountability
  • Lubienski, C., &Lubienski, S. T. (2006). Charter schools, academic achievement and NCLB. Journal of School Choice, 1(3), 55-62.
  • McMillan, R. (2000, January). Competition, parental involvement and public school performance. In Proceedings. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association (Vol. 93, pp. 150-155). National Tax Association
  • Palardy, J., Nesbit, T. M., &Adzima, K. A. (2015). Charter versus traditional public schools: a panel study of the technical efficiency in Ohio. Education Economics, 23(3), 278-295.
  • Powell, A. L. (2012). Parents' perceptions of factors influencing student's attendance.
  • Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The elementary school journal, 83(4), 427-452.
  • Rich, A., & Rich, A. (2000). Beyond the classroom: How parents influence their children's education. Centre for Independent Studies
  • Rose, B. A., & Stein, M. L. (2014). Mechanisms for teacher outreach to parents in charter and traditional public schools. Journal of School Choice, 8(4), 589-617.
  • Sammons, P. (1999). School effectiveness. CRC Press.
  • Sarason, S. B. (1998). Charter Schools: Another Flawed Educational Reform? The Series on School Reform. Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027..
  • Scheerens, J., Glas, C. A., Thomas, S. M., & Thomas, S. (2003). Educational evaluation, assessment, and monitoring: A systemic approach (Vol. 13). Taylor & Francis.
  • Shin, H. J., Fuller, B., &Dauter, L. (2017). Heterogeneous Effects of Charter Schools: Unpacking Family Selection and Achievement Growth in Los Angeles. Journal of School Choice, 11(1), 60-94.
  • Toutkoushian, R. K., & Curtis, T. (2005). Effects of socioeconomic factors on public high school outcomes and rankings. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(5), 259-271.
  • Weber, G. (1971). Inner-city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools. Council for Basic Education.
  • Weiler, S. C., & Vogel, L. R. (2015). Charter School Barriers: Do Enrollment Requirements Limit Student Access to Charter Schools?. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(1), 36-48.
  • Wright, T. (2009). Parent and teacher perceptions of effective parental involvement.
  • Yaacob, N. A., Osman, M. M., &Bachok, S. (2014). Factors influencing parents' decision in choosing private schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 242-253.
  • Yaacob, N. A., Osman, M. M., & Bachok, S. (2015). An assessment of factors influencing parents' decision making when choosing a private school for their children: a case study of Selangor, Malaysia: for sustainable human capital. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 28, 406-417.
  • Zimmer, R., & Buddin, R. (2006). Charter school performance in two large urban districts. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(2), 307-326.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Attique, M., Hussain, S., & Ali, A. (2019). Impact of Motivation on Students' and Teachers' Efficiency and School Effectiveness in Pakistan. Global Regional Review, IV(III), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-III).19

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Attique, Muhammad, Shahid Hussain, and Akhtar Ali. 2019. "Impact of Motivation on Students' and Teachers' Efficiency and School Effectiveness in Pakistan." Global Regional Review, IV (III): 171-178 doi: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-III).19

HARVARD

    HARVARD : ATTIQUE, M., HUSSAIN, S. & ALI, A. 2019. Impact of Motivation on Students' and Teachers' Efficiency and School Effectiveness in Pakistan. Global Regional Review, IV, 171-178.

MHRA

    MHRA : Attique, Muhammad, Shahid Hussain, and Akhtar Ali. 2019. "Impact of Motivation on Students' and Teachers' Efficiency and School Effectiveness in Pakistan." Global Regional Review, IV: 171-178

MLA

    MLA : Attique, Muhammad, Shahid Hussain, and Akhtar Ali. "Impact of Motivation on Students' and Teachers' Efficiency and School Effectiveness in Pakistan." Global Regional Review, IV.III (2019): 171-178 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Attique, Muhammad, Hussain, Shahid, and Ali, Akhtar (2019), "Impact of Motivation on Students' and Teachers' Efficiency and School Effectiveness in Pakistan", Global Regional Review, IV (III), 171-178

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Attique, Muhammad, Shahid Hussain, and Akhtar Ali. "Impact of Motivation on Students' and Teachers' Efficiency and School Effectiveness in Pakistan." Global Regional Review IV, no. III (2019): 171-178. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-III).19