ARTICLE

IDENTIFICATION OF THE LEARNING CHOICES OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN DISTRICT BAHAWALPUR

06 Pages : 59-66

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-IV).06      10.31703/grr.2020(V-IV).06      Published : Dec 2020

Identification of the Learning Choices of Undergraduate Students in District Bahawalpur

    Aim of the study was to identify the learning choices of undergraduate students. The key objectives of the study were (a) to examine the Impact of learning choices on academic achievement, (b) to find out the factors that influence the learning choices of undergraduate students. Nature of the study was descriptive, and the survey was used to explore the reasons from the students about their learning choices. Total 240 BS Students from Higher Education Institutions of District Bahawalpur were selected randomly. The questionnaire was the main source of collecting information from undergraduate students. Results of the study identified that majority of the undergraduate students face difficulty in choosing the right learning course while less than half of the students were satisfied with their learning choices.

    Learning Choices, Academic Achievement, Interest, Socioeconomic Status.
    (1) Safura Fatima
    M Phil Scholar, Department of Education, National College of Business Administration & Economics, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Sidra Rasheed
    PhD Scholar, Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Tehrima Sundas
    M Phil Scholar, Department of Education, National College of Business Administration & Economics, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Anders, J., Henderson, M., Moulton, V., & Sullivan, A. (2017). The role of schools in explaining individuals' subject choices at age 14 (CLS Working Paper). London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Institute of Education. [Google Scholar]
  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good but relevance is excellent: Autonomy affecting teacher behaviors that predict students' engagement in learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261-278.
  • Hutchinson, J. & Bentley, K. (2011). STEM Subjects and Jobs. A Longitudinal Perspective of Attitudes among Key Stage 3 Students, 2008-2010. Derby: International Centre for Guidance Studies, University of Derby.
  • Hutchinson, J., Stagg, P., & Bentley, K. (2009). STEM Careers Awareness Timelines: Attitudes and Ambitionstowards Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM at Key Stage 3). Derby: International Centre for Guidance Studies, University of Derby.
  • Jejeeboy, S. J. S., & Zeba A. (2001).
  • Joshua, B. (2014). Article Humanities teacher at science Leadership academy in Philadelphia.www.edutopia.org Journal of Adolescence, 34, 163-172.
  • Jin, W., Muriel, A., & Sibieta, L. (2011). Subject and course choices at ages 14 and 16 amongst young people in England: Insights from behavioural economics (DfE Research Report DFE-RR160). London: Department for Education. [Google Scholar]
  • Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment: A Criticle Analysis of the thirdMillennium Development Goal. Gender and Development, 13:01.
  • Kahlenberg, R. D. (2006). Integration by income.American School Board Journal. http://www.equaleducation.org/commentary.asp?opedi d=1332
  • Kim, H. S., & Drolet, A. (2003). Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 373-382.
  • Moulton, V., Henderson, M., Anders, J., & Sullivan, A. (2018). Does what you study at age 14-16 matter for educational transitions post-16? Oxford Review of Education, 44(1). [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). Test enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Europen journal of cognative Psychology Science, 17, 249!255.
  • Rouse, C. E., & Barrow, L. (2006). U.S. elementary and secondary schools: Equalizing opportunity or replicating the status quo? The Future of Children, 16(2), 99-123.
  • Russell Group. (2013). Informed choices: A Russell Group guide to making decisions about post-16 education. Russell Group guide. [Google Scholar]
  • Salter, S. K. (2008). Comparing outcomes of two instructional approaches to a career.
  • Teng, L. Y., Morgan, G. A., & Anderson, S. K. (2011). Career development among ethnic and age groups of community college students. Journal 28(2), 115-27.

Cite this article

    APA : Fatima, S., Rasheed, S., & Sundas, T. (2020). Identification of the Learning Choices of Undergraduate Students in District Bahawalpur. Global Regional Review, V(IV), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-IV).06
    CHICAGO : Fatima, Safura, Sidra Rasheed, and Tehrima Sundas. 2020. "Identification of the Learning Choices of Undergraduate Students in District Bahawalpur." Global Regional Review, V (IV): 59-66 doi: 10.31703/grr.2020(V-IV).06
    HARVARD : FATIMA, S., RASHEED, S. & SUNDAS, T. 2020. Identification of the Learning Choices of Undergraduate Students in District Bahawalpur. Global Regional Review, V, 59-66.
    MHRA : Fatima, Safura, Sidra Rasheed, and Tehrima Sundas. 2020. "Identification of the Learning Choices of Undergraduate Students in District Bahawalpur." Global Regional Review, V: 59-66
    MLA : Fatima, Safura, Sidra Rasheed, and Tehrima Sundas. "Identification of the Learning Choices of Undergraduate Students in District Bahawalpur." Global Regional Review, V.IV (2020): 59-66 Print.
    OXFORD : Fatima, Safura, Rasheed, Sidra, and Sundas, Tehrima (2020), "Identification of the Learning Choices of Undergraduate Students in District Bahawalpur", Global Regional Review, V (IV), 59-66
    TURABIAN : Fatima, Safura, Sidra Rasheed, and Tehrima Sundas. "Identification of the Learning Choices of Undergraduate Students in District Bahawalpur." Global Regional Review V, no. IV (2020): 59-66. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-IV).06