ARTICLE

EVALUATION OF M SC PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM IN PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS TEACHERS PERSPECTIVE

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

21 Pages : 204-213

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-III).21      10.31703/grr.2020(V-III).21      Published : Sep 2020

Evaluation of M. Sc Physical Education Program in Public Sector Institutions; Teachers' Perspective

Abstract

    The present study aimed at the evaluation of the M.Sc physical education program in public sector institutions in the context of teacher educators. The objectives of the study were (a) to evaluate the M.Sc Physical Education Program in public sector universities and colleges on the basis of CIPP, (b) to explore the strengths and weaknesses of the M.Sc Physical Education Program in Pakistan and (c) to suggest measures for further improvement of the M.Sc Program in Pakistan. A validated 44 items questionnaire for teacher educators was used for the collection of data. A Chi-square test was applied to the collected data. It was recommended that regular seminars and sports workshops might be organized to improve the research and report writing skills. It was also recommended that proper provision of physical facilities and sports infrastructure might also be provided to improve deficient aspects of the program.

    Physical Education, Public Sector Institutions, Teachers

    (1) Zulfiqar Ali
    PET, Department Elementary & Secondary Education, KP, Pakistan.
    (2) Asad Khan
    PhD Scholar, Department of Education, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
    (3) Farooq Hussain
    HOD, Department of Physical Education, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Ames, C, & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260- 267.
  • Bloomfield, A. (2007). Health or art?The case for dance in the curriculum of British State Schools 1909- 1919.History of Education, 36(6), 681-696.
  • Bowers, S. T. (2009). Adapted physical education professors' perceptions of teaching behaviors of effective general and adapted physical educators.Texas Woman's University.
  • Castelli, D., Hillman, C., Buck, S., & Erwin, H. (2007). Physical fitness and academic achievement in third and fifth grade students.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 239-252.
  • Coe, D. P. (2003).The importance of physical education classes in relation to physical activity behaviors, physical fitness, and academic achievement in middle school children (Doctoral dissertation).Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (3115952)
  • Corbin, C. B. (2002). Physical activity for everyone: What every physical educator should know about promoting lifelong physical activity. Journal of teaching in physical education, 21(2), 128-144.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., &Thoreson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 23(1), 57-77.
  • Ehrlich, G. (2008). Health = performance. American School Board Journal, 196(10), 42-44.
  • Faigenbaum, A., Farrell, A., Radler, T., Zbojovsky, D., Chu, D., Ratamess, N., & Hoffman, J. (2009).Plyo play: A novel program of short bouts of moderate and high intensity exercise improves physical fitness in elementary school children. Physical Educator, 66(1), 37-44.
  • Hillman, C., Castelli, D., & Buck, S. (2005). Physical fitness and neuro cognitive function in healthy preadolescent children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 37, 1967-1974.
  • Linn, R. L. (2008). Measurement and assessment in teaching.Pearson Education India.
  • Maloney, M., & McCormick, R. (1992).An examination of the role that intercollegiate athletic participation plays in academic achievement.The Journal of Human Resources, 28(3), 555-570
  • National Research Council.(1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Ali, Z., Khan, A., & Hussain, F. (2020). Evaluation of M. Sc Physical Education Program in Public Sector Institutions; Teachers' Perspective. Global Regional Review, V(III), 204-213. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-III).21

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Ali, Zulfiqar, Asad Khan, and Farooq Hussain. 2020. "Evaluation of M. Sc Physical Education Program in Public Sector Institutions; Teachers' Perspective." Global Regional Review, V (III): 204-213 doi: 10.31703/grr.2020(V-III).21

HARVARD

    HARVARD : ALI, Z., KHAN, A. & HUSSAIN, F. 2020. Evaluation of M. Sc Physical Education Program in Public Sector Institutions; Teachers' Perspective. Global Regional Review, V, 204-213.

MHRA

    MHRA : Ali, Zulfiqar, Asad Khan, and Farooq Hussain. 2020. "Evaluation of M. Sc Physical Education Program in Public Sector Institutions; Teachers' Perspective." Global Regional Review, V: 204-213

MLA

    MLA : Ali, Zulfiqar, Asad Khan, and Farooq Hussain. "Evaluation of M. Sc Physical Education Program in Public Sector Institutions; Teachers' Perspective." Global Regional Review, V.III (2020): 204-213 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Ali, Zulfiqar, Khan, Asad, and Hussain, Farooq (2020), "Evaluation of M. Sc Physical Education Program in Public Sector Institutions; Teachers' Perspective", Global Regional Review, V (III), 204-213

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Ali, Zulfiqar, Asad Khan, and Farooq Hussain. "Evaluation of M. Sc Physical Education Program in Public Sector Institutions; Teachers' Perspective." Global Regional Review V, no. III (2020): 204-213. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-III).21