ARTICLE

CRITICAL THINKING AND CURRICULUM OF ENGLISH AT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL LEVEL IN PAKISTAN

26 Pages : 255-262

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-III).26      10.31703/grr.2020(V-III).26      Published : Sep 2020

Critical Thinking and Curriculum of English at Higher Secondary School Level in Pakistan

    International competitiveness, new technologies and changing markets resulted in a paradigm shift in education that demanded to enrich students with higher-order thinking skills, especially critical thinking. National Curriculum Pakistan was developed and launched in 2006. The curriculum of English (2006) has been devised to provide opportunities for language development of learners to equip them with the competencies that help to better adapt to knowledge advancement and ever-changing local and global society. To investigate if the intended curriculum of English has the goals of higher-order thinking and the planned curriculum in the form of textbooks, is designed keeping in view the current demands of competitive competencies for what the National curriculum of English was planned, and to assess the teachers' perspectives and perception about critical thinking, the researcher conducted a qualitative study. In one of the districts of Punjab Pakistan, based upon the highest enrollment, four male and four female colleges from each of its four subdivisions were selected. One male and one female teacher from each college volunteered to participate in the study. The three-stage study aimed to analyze the intended and planned curriculum of English at higher secondary school level and then analyze the teacher's perception regarding critical thinking, and the actual classroom practices were observed to review the enacted curriculum.

    21st Century Skills, Critical Thinking, Curriculum of English, Critical Analysis, Professional Development
    (1) Ms Bushra
    PhD Scholar, Department of Educational Planning Policy Studies and Leadership, Allama Iqbal Open University Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (2) Afshan Huma
    Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Planning Policy Studies and Leadership, Allama Iqbal Open University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Ananiadou, K. & Claro, M. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. OECD Education Working Papers,No. 41. Paris, OECDPublishing. (Accessed 22 June 2014). www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP (20 09)20
  • Ashraf, H. & Rarieya, J. F. (2008). Teacher development through reflective conversations- possibilities and tensions: a Pakistan case. Reflective practice, 9(3), pp.269-279.
  • Brill, J. M., Kim, D., & Branch, R. M. (2007). Visual literacy defined-the results of a Delphi study can IVLA (operationally) define visual literacy? Journal of Visual Literacy, 27(1), 47-60.
  • Cassum, S. H., Profetto-McGrath, J., Gul, R. B., Dilshad, A. & Syeda, K. (2013). Multidimensionality of critical thinking. A holistic perspective from multidisciplinary educators in Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(7), pp.9-23.
  • Cosgrove (2011). Improving Teaching & Learning of Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum at a Large Research University; University of Cambridge
  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, N. J. Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, California Sage Publications.
  • Denscombe, M. (2010). Ground rules for social research guidelines for good practice (2nd ed.). New York. Open University Press.
  • Dowhower, S. (1997). Wordless books promise and possibilities, a genre come of age. In K. Camperell, B. L.Hayes, & R. Telfer (Eds.), Promises, progress and possibilities perspectives of literacy education(pp. 57-79). Yearbook of the American Reading Forum (Vol. 17).
  • Evans, J. (1998). Responding to illustrations in picture story books. Reading, 32(2), 27-31.
  • Gehrke, N. J., Knapp, M. S., & Sirotnik, K. A. (1992). In Search of the School Curriculum. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 51-110). Washington, D.C. American Educational Research Association.
  • González, N. (2005). Beyond culture the hybridity of funds of knowledge. In N. González, L. C.Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge theorizingpractices in households, communities, and classrooms (pp. 29-46). Mahwah, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gözütok, F. D. (2003). Türkiye'de program geliştirmeçalışmaları [Curriculum development study in Turkey]. MilliEğitimDergisi,160.. http//dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/milli_egitim_dergisi/160gozutok .htm
  • Harden, R. M. (2001). AMEE Guide No. 21 Curriculum mapping a tool for transparent andauthentic teaching and learning, Medical Teacher, 23(2), pp.123-13727119 jan,15 . http//www.Bhmedemanual.org/ book/export/html/93
  • Iqbal, H. M., & Shayer, M. (1995). Distribution of Piagetian cognitive levels in middleschoolstudents and its match with science curricula. Bulletinof Education and Research, Lahore, XVII-XVIII, pp.42-48. In
  • Iqbal, H. M., & Shayer, M. (2000). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in Pakistansecondary school students Achievement effects and professional development issues. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 37(3), pp.259-274.
  • Khan, S, I., (2017). An Investigation of the Concept of Critical Thinking in the Context of Functional English Course in a B. Ed Degree in Pakistan, University of Glascow.
  • Kong, S. L. (2007). Cultivating critical and creative thinkingskills. In A.G. Tan (Ed.), CreativityA handbook for teachers (pp. 303-326). Hackensack, NJ World Scientific Publishing
  • Kösterioğlu, Ä°. & Özen, R. (2014). Sınıföğretmenlerininsosyalbilgilerdersiöğretimprogramınıuygulama yayönelikhizmetiçieğitimihtiyaçları [Inservice training needs of classroomteachers towards the implementation of social studies curriculum]. AbantÄ°zzetBaysalÜniversitesiEğitimFakültesiDergisi, 14(1), 153-176.
  • Lave, J. (2009). The practice of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning learning theorists ……in their own words (pp. 200-208). London, NewYork Routledge.
  • Luke, A. & Freebody, P. (1999a). A map of possible practicesfurther notes on the four resources model. Practically Primary, 4(2), 5-8.
  • Luke, A. & Freebody, P. (1999b). Further notes on the four resources model. Retrieved 2 March 2011, from http//www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=handbook/gee/index.html
  • Mahmood, S (2017). Testing the Effectiveness of Critical ThinkingSkillsIntervention for initialteacher education students in Pakistan. University of South Ampton.
  • Mc Tighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by designframework.AlexandriaAssociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development. July 27, 2013 www.ascd.org.
  • McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. W .(2008). The three p's of pedagogy for the networked societypersonalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learningin Higher Education, (201), pp. 10-27. (Accessed 2 March 2014). http//files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/EJ895221.pdf
  • Meng, K. H. (2016). Infusion of Critical Thinking Across the English Language Curriculum, University of Australia
  • Morris, P. & Adamson, P. (2010). Curriculum, Schooling and Society in Hong Kong. Hong Kong, HKSARHong Kong University Press
  • NEP, 2009: National Education Policy (2009). http//unesco.org.pk/education/teachereducation/files/ National Education Policy.pdf
  • Paul, R. and Elder, L. (2005). The state of critical thinking today. New Directions for Community Colleges, 130, pp.27- 38.
  • Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Leis, M., Leendertse, M., Punie, Y., Gijsbers, G., Kirschner, P.,Stoyanov, S. and Hoogveld, B. 2011. The Future of LearningPreparing for Change. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union. (Accessed 5 April 2016). http//ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC66836.pdf
  • Renaud, R. D. & Murray, H. G. (2007). The validity of higher-order questions as a process indicator of educational quality. Research in Higher Education, 48(3), 319-351.
  • Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem the transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Sahlberg, P. (2006). Education reform for raising economic competitiveness. Journal ofEducational Change, 7(4), 259-287.
  • UNESCO (2015). Adult and Youth Literacy. UNESCO Institute for statistics. Available at.htmlaccessed on 15/01/18. http//www.uis.unesco.org/literacy/Documents/fs32-2015-literacy.pdf www.uis.unesco. org/literacy/Documents/UIS-literacy-statistics-1990-2015-en.pdf
  • Unsworth, L. & Wheeler, J. (2002). Re-valuing the role of images in reviewing picture books. ReadingLiteracy and Language, 36(2), 68-74.
  • Wagner, T. 2010. Overcoming. The Global Achievement Gap (online). Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University. (Accessed 16 July 2014). www.aypf.org/documents/Wagner Slides global achievement gap brief 5-10. Pdf
  • Wenger, E. (2009). A social theory of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learninglearning theorists ……in their own words (pp. 209-218). London, New YorkRoutledge.
  • Yapıcı, M., &Demirdelen, C. (2007). Teachers' views with regard to the primary 4th grade social sciences curriculum. Elementary Education Online, 6(2), 204-212.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Bushra, Ms, and Afshan Huma. 2020. "Critical Thinking and Curriculum of English at Higher Secondary School Level in Pakistan." Global Regional Review, V (III): 255-262 doi: 10.31703/grr.2020(V-III).26
    HARVARD : BUSHRA, M. & HUMA, A. 2020. Critical Thinking and Curriculum of English at Higher Secondary School Level in Pakistan. Global Regional Review, V, 255-262.
    MHRA : Bushra, Ms, and Afshan Huma. 2020. "Critical Thinking and Curriculum of English at Higher Secondary School Level in Pakistan." Global Regional Review, V: 255-262
    MLA : Bushra, Ms, and Afshan Huma. "Critical Thinking and Curriculum of English at Higher Secondary School Level in Pakistan." Global Regional Review, V.III (2020): 255-262 Print.
    OXFORD : Bushra, Ms and Huma, Afshan (2020), "Critical Thinking and Curriculum of English at Higher Secondary School Level in Pakistan", Global Regional Review, V (III), 255-262
    TURABIAN : Bushra, Ms, and Afshan Huma. "Critical Thinking and Curriculum of English at Higher Secondary School Level in Pakistan." Global Regional Review V, no. III (2020): 255-262. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-III).26