ARTICLE

CONTRACTUAL STIPULATIONS UNDER CLASSIC ISLAMIC LAW AND CURRENT MARRIAGE CONTRACTS IN USA

22 Pages : 186 - 195

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).22      10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).22      Published : Jun 2021

Contractual Stipulations Under Classic Islamic Law and Current Marriage Contracts in USA

    This article focuses on stipulations in a Muslim marriage contract with reference to the case of the United States of America(USA). Under classical Islamic work, the majority of Jurists (Jamhur) classify those stipulations as valid or invalid. Valid stipulations are permissible because those promote the objectives of the marriage contract. Invalid stipulations are prohibited for their inconsistency with the principles of Shari'ah. Yet another category of stipulations benefiting the women could be found in a marriage contract. Interestingly,this category is neither prohibited in clear terms nor is expressly allowed. After the conclusion of a marriage contract, Jamhur restrict the insertion of subsequent stipulations, while Hanbali School allows the addition of such stipulations provided it would be of extrinsic nature.In this context, this paper attempts to determine the role and status of stipulations in marriage contracts on the criterion of its beneficial nature for wives.

    Marriage, Contract, Stipulations, Classical Jurists, Additional Conditions, Women Empowerment
    (1) Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan Arif
    Assistant Professor of Law, Department of Law, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
    (2) Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi
    Assistant Professor of Law, Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan
    (3) Nafees Ahmed Khan
    Lecturer in Law, Department of Law, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mirpur University of Science and Technology, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.
  • Abdal-Rehim, A. R. (1996).
  • Al-Bukhari, Muhammad Isma'il. Sahih, hadith no. 2721
  • Al-Hibri, A. (2005).
  • Alkhateeb, M. (2012). Islamic Marriage Contracts: A Resource Guide for Legal Professionals, Advocates, Imams, and Communities. Peaceful Families Project, Asian & Pacific Islander Institute on Domestic Violence, and Battered Women's Justice Project.
  • Al-Qazwayni, A. (1990). Al-Sunan, Lahore: Kitab al- nikah, Islamic Academy
  • Anderson, J. N. D. (1970).
  • Atkinson, J. (1996). The American Bar Association Guide to Family Law: The Complete and Easy Guide to the Laws of Marriage, Parenthood, Separation, and Divorce. New York: Random Hous
  • Baillie, B. E. (1875). A Digest of Moohummudan Law. 2nd edn, Smith, Elder and Co.
  • Bukhari, Imam. Sahih Bukhari, 1 1143-1144.
  • Cherlin Andrew, J. (2009). The Marriage-Go-Round: The State of Marriage and the Family in America Today. New York: Knopf.
  • Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn. (1986). Islamic Law and Society in the Sudan. New Jersey: F. Cass
  • Ibn Abidin. (1982). Radd al-Mukhtar. Vol: 2, Quetta: Matbaah Majidiyyah.
  • Ibn Qudamah. (1985). Al-Mughni. Beirut, Vol: 6, Dar al-Fikr. Vol.6. 1405 H.
  • Ishtiaq Ahmad v. The State, etc, Criminal Petition No. 1252 of 2016, Announced 21 February. 2017.
  • Kamali, M. H. (2009). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. 3rd Edition Islamic Texts Society UK.
  • Mansoori, M. T. (2006). Family law in Islam: Theory and Application. Shariah Academy, International Islamic University Islamabad.
  • Munir, M. (2005-06).
  • Munir, M., (2019).
  • Musa, M. Y. (1955).
  • Qureshi, A., & Syeed Milier, N. (2009).
  • Raihanah, A., (2008).
  • Report prepared by Dr. Julie Macfarlane. (2012).
  • Samara, M. (1987). Sham muqarin Ii qiinun al-ahwa! Al-shakhsiya (Comparative Commentary on the Law of Personal Status). Jerusalem.
  • Shawkani, Imam Muhammad ash. (2002). Nayl al- Awtar. vol.5, Dar al Wafa. Sunan Tirmidhi, 1, p420. The Holy Quran, 5: 1, Al Bakarrah, 177, 17:34, 27:34, al-Isra' 17:34, Al-Maidah 5:1, al- Nisa' 4:3.
  • Welchman, L. (2000). Beyond the Code: Muslim Family Law and the Shariah Judiciary in the Palestinian West Bank. The Hague: Kluwer Law International
  • Welchman, L. (2004). Women's rights and Islamic family law, perspectives on reform. London Newyork: Zed Book Limited.
  • Zaidan, Abd al- Karim. (1986). Al-Madkhal Li Dirasat Shari'ah Islamiah. Maktabah Al-Quds

Cite this article

    APA : Arif, S. M. W. K., Gardazi, S. M. F., & Khan, N. A. (2021). Contractual Stipulations Under Classic Islamic Law and Current Marriage Contracts in USA. Global Regional Review, VI(II), 186 - 195. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).22
    CHICAGO : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi, and Nafees Ahmed Khan. 2021. "Contractual Stipulations Under Classic Islamic Law and Current Marriage Contracts in USA." Global Regional Review, VI (II): 186 - 195 doi: 10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).22
    HARVARD : ARIF, S. M. W. K., GARDAZI, S. M. F. & KHAN, N. A. 2021. Contractual Stipulations Under Classic Islamic Law and Current Marriage Contracts in USA. Global Regional Review, VI, 186 - 195.
    MHRA : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi, and Nafees Ahmed Khan. 2021. "Contractual Stipulations Under Classic Islamic Law and Current Marriage Contracts in USA." Global Regional Review, VI: 186 - 195
    MLA : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi, and Nafees Ahmed Khan. "Contractual Stipulations Under Classic Islamic Law and Current Marriage Contracts in USA." Global Regional Review, VI.II (2021): 186 - 195 Print.
    OXFORD : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Gardazi, Syed Mudasser Fida, and Khan, Nafees Ahmed (2021), "Contractual Stipulations Under Classic Islamic Law and Current Marriage Contracts in USA", Global Regional Review, VI (II), 186 - 195
    TURABIAN : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi, and Nafees Ahmed Khan. "Contractual Stipulations Under Classic Islamic Law and Current Marriage Contracts in USA." Global Regional Review VI, no. II (2021): 186 - 195. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).22