ARTICLE

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN FEDERATION AND FEDERALISM

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

33 Pages : 300-307

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).33      10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).33      Published : Mar 2020

Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism

Abstract

    This paper discusses the comparative analysis between federalism and federation. Federalism is a theoretical framework while federation is a legal term manifesting itself in pragmatic form. The former is normative while the latter is descriptive in nature. Federalism is the means while federation is the end as there can be federalism without federation but there can be no federation without federalism. Federalism refers to an ideological perspective which acts as prescriptive guide while federation connotes constitutionally well-established institution. It has been discussed in formal centralized or effective centralized form, unitary or decentralized form, symmetrical or asymmetrical form, and fully or partially centralized form. Centripetal and Centrifugal forces provide the basic framework for federalism. Various forms of federations have been discussed in parlance of three different models of federalism.

    Federation, Federalism, Government, Units, Framework

    (1) Muhammad Tariq
    School Teacher, Elementary & Secondary Education Department Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • AlIFF, S. M. (2015). New Trends and Models in Federalism. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSRJHSS) , 20 (11), 76.
  • Benjamin, S. O. (2004). Federal State and State- State Relations in Nigeria: A Case Study of Lagos State.
  • Bryce, J. (1929). Modern Democracies. London : Macmillan and Co. .
  • Bulmer, E. (2015). Federalism . The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA)
  • Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism, Theory and Practice. Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA .
  • Burgess, M. (2006). Compasrative Federalism: Theory and Practice. New York, USA: Routledge (Taylors and Francis Group).
  • Cornell, S. E. (2002).
  • Crawford, J. (1979). The Creation of States in International Law. London: Clarendon Press.
  • Dosenrode, S. (2010).
  • Elazer, D. J. (1995). Federalism: An Overview . Human Science Research Council (HSRC) , 6
  • Frankel, M. (1986). Federal Theory . Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations (ANU). , 241-270.
  • Gagnon, A. (1993). Comparative Federalism and Federations. London: Harvest Printing Press .
  • Ghai, Y. (2000). Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Competiting Claims in Multi-ethnic States. 8.
  • Haq, M. u. (1985). PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OR THEORY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE. 239. BOOKLAND PUBLISHERS & BOOKSELLERS 17. URDU BAZAR LAHORE.
  • Ikelegbe, A. (2004). Intergovernmental Relations, Government and Development in Nigeria
  • King, P. (1982). Federalism and Federation. Baltimore : John Hopkins University Press.
  • Lapidoth, R. E. (1997). Autonomy: Flexible Solution to Ethnic Politics . 29.
  • Law, J. (2013). How can we define federalism, http://www.onfederalsim.ed/attachments/169_download.pd
  • Livingston, W. S. (1956). Federalism and Constitutional Change. London : Oxford University Press.
  • Loughlin, J. (2007).
  • Loughlin, J. (2007).
  • Obi, E. (2019). The Theory, Practice and Current Trends in Federalism . Journal of Social Service and Welfare , 1 (1), 10.
  • Romney, P. (1888). Getting it Wrong: How Canadians forgot their Pastand Imperilled Confederation. 272. Toronto: University of Toronto.
  • Sharada, R. (1984). Federalism Today . New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.
  • Sharma, B. M. (1955). Federalism in Theory and Practice. 10. Chanduari: Bhargava and Sons.
  • Shodhganga. (2015, July 7). Federalism: A Theoretical Perspective. Retrieved from shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/98721/8/08_chapter 2.pdf.
  • Tariq, M. (2018). An Analysis of Major Theories of Federalism . Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR) , III (IV), 400-412.
  • Tariq, M. (2018). Prospects of Federalism in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR) , 356-364.These Thirteen States were: New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Noth Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. . (n.d.).
  • Umbach, M. (2002). German Federalism: Past, Present and Future. New York: Palgrav-Macmillan Publications.
  • Verma, L. S. (1986). Federal Authority in the Indian Political System. 1.
  • Watts, R. L. (2008). Comparing Federal Systems. London: Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  • Wiberg, M. (1998). Political Autonomy: Applications and Implications . 43.
  • Wright, R. (1962). Federalism: origin, Operation, Significance.

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Tariq, Muhammad. 2020. "Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism." Global Regional Review, V (I): 300-307 doi: 10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).33

HARVARD

    HARVARD : TARIQ, M. 2020. Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism. Global Regional Review, V, 300-307.

MHRA

    MHRA : Tariq, Muhammad. 2020. "Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism." Global Regional Review, V: 300-307

MLA

    MLA : Tariq, Muhammad. "Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism." Global Regional Review, V.I (2020): 300-307 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Tariq, Muhammad (2020), "Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism", Global Regional Review, V (I), 300-307

TURABIAN