ARTICLE

ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE LAB FACILITIES AT SECONDARY LEVEL

10 Pages : 90 - 101

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2022(VII-I).10      10.31703/grr.2022(VII-I).10      Published : Mar 2022

Analysis of Available Lab Facilities at Secondary Level

    Science education plays an important role in the creation of creativity in the personality of students. There is a strong relationship between science education and practical work, due to which it is not possible for the students to have conceptual knowledge of science subjects without proper practical performance in the classroom. The purpose of this research study was to analyse the available lab facilities in secondary schools. The research was qualitative in nature. The population of this research study was all the high schools of district Narowal. There was a total of 157 high schools indistrict Narowal which were 75 boy high schools and 82 girls high schools. In the first stage,proportionate stratified sampling techniques were used to select male and female public sector high schools. In the second stage, 20 Percent of high schools from each stratum were taken by using a simple random sampling technique. Therefore, there was a total of 31 public sector high schools, 20 Percent of which 15 public sector high schools for boys and 16 public sector high schools for girls were selected. It is concluded that spring balance, pendulum, magnet, prism, screw gauge, glass slab and voltmeter facilities was highly observed in secondary schools which signifies their availability.

    Lab Facilities, Secondary school, Science Laboratory
    (1) Muhammad Irfan Irshad
    M.Phil Scholar, Superior University Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Muhammad Aamir Hashmi
    Associate Professor, Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Arzi, H. (2003). Enhancing science education laboratory environment: More than wall, benches and widgets. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds. ), International Handbook of Science Education, 595-608, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Fraser, B. J., & Lee, S. S. U. (2009). Science laboratory environment in Korean high school. Learning Environment Research, 12, 67-84.
  • Gidding, G. J., & Waldrip, B. G. (1993). Teaching Practices, Science Laboratory Learning Environment and Attitudes in South Pacific Secondary Schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA, 12th -16th April. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED36 3507.pdf
  • Hofstein, A., Levi-Nahum, T., & Shore, R. (2001). Assessment of the learning environment of inquiry type laboratories in high school chemistry. Learning Environments Research, 4, 193-207.
  • Aburime, E. F. (2004). Refocusing Research Technology and Mathematics Education: A Case for Mathematics Laboratory. Akure: Proceeding of the 45th Annual Conference of Science Teachers'Association of Nigeria.
  • Akpan, O. (2006). Laboratory Facilities for Chemistry Teaching. Unpublished Seminar Paper. Nigeria: University of Calabar.
  • Ausubel, D. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
  • Eshiet, I.T. (1996). Improvisation in Science Teaching Philosophy and Practice. Abak: Belpot Press.
  • Felder, R. M., & Prince, M. J. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 123-138
  • Hager, W. R. (1974). An investigation of verbal behamor and learning climate in undergraduate engineerimg clmsrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(2), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.36601102 07
  • Hofstein, A., & Ginetta, A. (1998). Trends in Assessment of Laboratory Performance in Secondary Schools in Instruction . Iowa: University of Iowa Press.
  • Lagoke, B. A., Jegede, O. J., & Oyebanji, P. K. (1997). Towards an elimination of the gender gulf in science concept attainment through the use of environmental analogs. International Journal of Science Education, 19(4), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500699701 90401
  • Lazarowitz, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In: Gabel, D.L., (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, New York: Macmillan, 94-130.
  • NCERT. (2005a). National Curriculum Framework 2005. New Delhi, India: NCERT.
  • NCERT. (2005b). National Focus Group on Teaching of Science 2005 . New Delhi, India: NCERT.
  • Okafor, P.N. (2000). Difficult concepts in physics as experienced by senior secondary students in Akwa Ibom State. Journal of Research Information in Education, 1(1), 114-121.
  • Okeke, R. J. (1995). Principles of development selection, utilization, evaluation storage and retrieval of instructional materials. In: Okwo, F.A., & Ike, G.A., (Eds.), Educational Technology: Basic Concepts of Issues . Nsukka: University Trust Publishers, 45-76.
  • Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance' in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49, 1-3.
  • Permendiknas (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 24 Tahun 2007 T entang Sarana dan Prasarana Untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah (Jakarta: Permendiknas)
  • Fldoe (2015). A Summary of Safety Statutes,Rules and Recommendations for Science (Florida: Florida Department of Education).
  • Wahyono, A. I., & Rusman. (2017). Implementation of Scientific Approach Based Learning to Think High Levels in State Senior High School in Ketapang. International Journal of Education and Research. 5, 221-230.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Irshad, Muhammad Irfan, and Muhammad Aamir Hashmi. 2022. "Analysis of Available Lab Facilities at Secondary Level." Global Regional Review, VII (I): 90 - 101 doi: 10.31703/grr.2022(VII-I).10
    HARVARD : IRSHAD, M. I. & HASHMI, M. A. 2022. Analysis of Available Lab Facilities at Secondary Level. Global Regional Review, VII, 90 - 101.
    MHRA : Irshad, Muhammad Irfan, and Muhammad Aamir Hashmi. 2022. "Analysis of Available Lab Facilities at Secondary Level." Global Regional Review, VII: 90 - 101
    MLA : Irshad, Muhammad Irfan, and Muhammad Aamir Hashmi. "Analysis of Available Lab Facilities at Secondary Level." Global Regional Review, VII.I (2022): 90 - 101 Print.
    OXFORD : Irshad, Muhammad Irfan and Hashmi, Muhammad Aamir (2022), "Analysis of Available Lab Facilities at Secondary Level", Global Regional Review, VII (I), 90 - 101
    TURABIAN : Irshad, Muhammad Irfan, and Muhammad Aamir Hashmi. "Analysis of Available Lab Facilities at Secondary Level." Global Regional Review VII, no. I (2022): 90 - 101. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2022(VII-I).10