ARTICLE

EXPRESSING ATTITUDINAL STANCE IN PAKISTANI ACADEMIC WRITING A CORPUS BASED STUDY

20 Pages : 175-185

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).20      10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).20      Published : Mar 2019

Expressing Attitudinal Stance in Pakistani Academic Writing: A Corpus Based Study

    The present research aims to investigate the use of attitudinal stance devices proposed by Biber (2006) in Pakistani academic writing with respect to variation among disciplines. A special purpose corpus of Pakistani Academic Writing is built up with 235 research dissertations of M.Phil and PhD graduates representing three important disciplines (Humanities, Social Sciences and Sciences) and is tagged for the lexical and grammatical features expressing attitudinal stance to measure the frequency count of each feature out of 1000 words. The frequencies of attitudinal stance devices are separately calculated for each discipline and one way ANOVA is administered to see the significant differences among disciplines on the use of attitudinal stance devices. The findings reveal statistically significant differences among disciplines and would support the ESP syllabus designers and Pakistani academic writers.Key words: Attitudinal Stance Devices, Disciplinary variation, Pakistani Academic writing

    Attitudinal Stance Devices, Disciplinary Variation, Pakistani Academic Writing
    (1) Musarrat Azher
    Lecturer,Department of English,University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Humaira Jehanagir
    PhD scholar, Department of English, Lancaster University, Lancashire, England.
    (3) Rabia Faiz
    Lecturer, Department of English, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Abdi, R. (2002). Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies, 4, 139- 145.
  • Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 288-297.
  • Adams, H., & Quintana-Toledo, E. (2013). Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 8, 13-22.
  • Ahmad, U., & Mehrjooseresht, M. (2012). Stance adverbials in engineering thesis abstracts. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 29-36.
  • Ansarin, A. A., & Aliabdi, H. T. (2011). Reader Engagement in English and Persian applied linguistics articles. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 154.
  • Anthony, L. (2011). Antconc (Version 3.2.4). Tokyo, Japan: Laurence Anthony, University of Waseda.
  • Azher, M. & Mehmood, A. (2016). Exploring new discourses of Pakistani academic writing: A Multidimensional Analysis. Science international, 28(4), 245-254
  • Azher, M. & Mehmood, A. (2016). Exploring Linguistic Variation across Pakistani Academic Writing: A Multidimensional Analysis, Journal of Critical Inquiry, 14(2), NUML.
  • Azher&Mehmood, (2016). Comparing Linguistic Features of Academic Discourse in Pakistani and British English, Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2) GCU, Faisalabad.
  • Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116.
  • Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press.
  • Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse processes, 11(1), 1-34.
  • Biber, D. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Blagojević, S. (2009). Expressing attitudes in academic research articles written by English and Serbian authors, Linguistics and Literature. 7(1), 63-73.
  • Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93-124.
  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman
  • Chafe, W. L., & Nichols, J. (Eds.). (1986). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Charles, M. (2006). The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492-518.
  • Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (1999). Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. English for specific purposes, 13(3), 239-256.
  • Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of second language writing, 13(2), 133-151.
  • Hyland, K. (2014). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research article. In Candlin, C. N., & Hyland, K. (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99-121). Routledge: Taylor & Francis.
  • Hyland, K. (2011). 10 Disciplines and Discourses: Social Interactions in the Construction of Knowledge. Writing in knowledge societies. Perspectives on writing, 193-214.
  • McGrath, L., & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 161-173.
  • Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1989). Language has a heart. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 9(1), 7-26.
  • Palmer, F. (1979). Modality and the English modals. New York: Longman.
  • Sayah, L., & Hashemi, M. R. (2014). Exploring Stance and Engagement Features in Discourse Analysis Papers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(3), 593-601.

Cite this article

    APA : Azher, M., Jehanagir, H., & Faiz, R. (2019). Expressing Attitudinal Stance in Pakistani Academic Writing: A Corpus Based Study. Global Regional Review, IV(I), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).20
    CHICAGO : Azher, Musarrat, Humaira Jehanagir, and Rabia Faiz. 2019. "Expressing Attitudinal Stance in Pakistani Academic Writing: A Corpus Based Study." Global Regional Review, IV (I): 175-185 doi: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).20
    HARVARD : AZHER, M., JEHANAGIR, H. & FAIZ, R. 2019. Expressing Attitudinal Stance in Pakistani Academic Writing: A Corpus Based Study. Global Regional Review, IV, 175-185.
    MHRA : Azher, Musarrat, Humaira Jehanagir, and Rabia Faiz. 2019. "Expressing Attitudinal Stance in Pakistani Academic Writing: A Corpus Based Study." Global Regional Review, IV: 175-185
    MLA : Azher, Musarrat, Humaira Jehanagir, and Rabia Faiz. "Expressing Attitudinal Stance in Pakistani Academic Writing: A Corpus Based Study." Global Regional Review, IV.I (2019): 175-185 Print.
    OXFORD : Azher, Musarrat, Jehanagir, Humaira, and Faiz, Rabia (2019), "Expressing Attitudinal Stance in Pakistani Academic Writing: A Corpus Based Study", Global Regional Review, IV (I), 175-185
    TURABIAN : Azher, Musarrat, Humaira Jehanagir, and Rabia Faiz. "Expressing Attitudinal Stance in Pakistani Academic Writing: A Corpus Based Study." Global Regional Review IV, no. I (2019): 175-185. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).20