ARTICLE

DELEUZE AND GUATTARIS IMMANENT PLANE AND BECOMING IN A FAIRY TALE

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

25 Pages : 233-242

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-II).25      10.31703/grr.2019(IV-II).25      Published : Jun 2019

Deleuze and Guattaris Immanent Plane and Becoming in a Fairy Tale

Abstract

    The entities exist on dual planes, on the physical or transcendental plane, in forms, and the philosophical or immanent plane that only considered intensity and movement of the objects. The present study is grounded on the notions of Deleuze and Guattari (1987) who considered immanent plane to be affecting and transforming the indulged bodies through process of becoming. The present study, through thematic analysis, investigated a few instances from the character of Alex Bailey, from, The Enchantress Returns (2013). The findings depicted that becoming was a constant process. Additionally, the becoming bodies or objects could be physical, imaginary, psychological or phenomenal. The transformations through becoming were not physical and did not appear on transcendent plane. Moreover, the affected bodies depicted the difference in their thoughts and actions.

    Physical, philosophical, Immanent plane, transcendence plane, objects, transformation

    (1) Zainab Akram
    Assistant Professor,Department of English,Sardar Bahadur Khan Womens University, Pakistan.
    (2) Faria Saeed Khan
    Professor, Department of English,University of Baluchistan, Quetta, Baluchistan, Pakistan.
    (3) Samreen Zaheer
    Lecturer,Department of English,NUML, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (2001). The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture, ed. J.M. Bernstein. New York: Routledge
  • Baudrillard, J. (2006). The system of objects. New York: Verso
  • Bryant, L. R. (2011a). A logic ofmultiplicities: Deleuze, immanence, and onticology. Anelecta Hermeneutica, (3), ISSN 1918-7351
  • Bryant, L. R. (2011b). The ontic principle: Outline of an object oriented ontology. In the speculative turn: continental materialism and realism,eds. Levi Bryant, Nick Srnicek, and Graham Harman (Melbourne: Re. Press, pp. 261-27
  • Colfer, Chris. (2013). The Enchantress Returns. Hachette Book Group, In
  • Daniel. W. S. (2000). The doctrine of univocity. Deleuze's ontology of immanence. In Deleuze and religion, ed. Mary Bryden, London/New York: Routledge, pp 160
  • Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, p. 353
  • Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy?, New York: Columbia University Press, 75. Hereafter, WP.)
  • Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. M. Lester & C. Stivale (trans.), Constantin V. Boundas (ed.). The Athlonc Press: London. Originally published as loqique Ju Sens © 1969 by Les Kditions de Minuit, Pari
  • Deleuze, G. (1992). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. trans. Martin Joughin. New York: Zone Books, 170
  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition, trans. Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press, 37
  • Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: Essays on a life, trans. Anne Boyman, New York, Urzone
  • Deleuze, G. (2004). The method of dramatization. In Desert Islands and Other Texts (19531974), Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), pp. 94-116.
  • Drobyshev, V. N. (2015). Plane of immanence and apology of transcendence. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences5(8), 852-863
  • Goodchild, P. (2000). Why is philosophy so compromised with God? In Deleuze and Religion, ed. Mary Bryden, London/New York: Routledg
  • Griffiths, P. E. & Gray, R. D. (2001).
  • Guinnane, D. (2013). Planes of immanence: There is no outside to the text, they read it from within. Retrieved from www.perfomap
  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
  • Lester, M. & Stivale, C. (trans.). (1990). Id. The logic of sense. The Athlone Press, London
  • Mackenzie, I., & Porter, R. (2011). Dramatization as method in political theory.Contemporary Political Theory,10(4), 482-501
  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press, 2
  • Oyama, S. (2001)
  • Patton, P. (1997). The world seen from within: Deleuze and the philosophy of events.Theory & Event 1:1, pp. 1-13
  • Rodari, G. (1996). The Grammar of fantasy, ed. and trans. Jack Zipes. New York: Teachers and Writers Collaborative.
  • Rölli, M. (2004). Immanence and transcendence. Bulletin de la Sociite Amincaine de Philosophie de Langue Franfais, 14 (2). Pp
  • Salvadori, M. L. (2002).
  • Smith, D. W. (2007). Deleuze and the question of desire: Toward an immanent theory of ethics. Parrhesia, 2, pp. 66-78
  • Spindler, F. (2010). Gilles Deleuze: A philosophy of immanence. In (J. Bornemark& H. Ruin, eds.) Phenomenology and Religion: New Frontiers. Sodertorne: Sodertorne University Press. pp. 149-163
  • Thiele, K. (2016). Of immanence and becoming: Deleuze and Guattari's philosophy and/as relational ontology, ‘Deleuze, ethics and dramatization (eds. L. Lawlor and A. Wiame), Deleuze Studies10.1, pp. 117-13
  • Vaismoradi, M. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, pp. 398-405
  • Vig, A. (2010). Deleuze's interpretation of immanence. TÁMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0008 project in New Hungarian Development Plan, supported by the European Union and the European SocialFund
  • Zipes, J. (2006). The liberating potential of the fantastic in contemporary fairy tales for children. In Fairy tales and the art of subversion: The classical genre for children and the process of civilization, 2nd. rev. ed. pp.169-192. New York: Routledg
  • Zipes, J. (2012). A fairy tale is more than just a fairy tale. Book 2.0, 2 (1 & 2).
  • Zourabichvili, F. (2003). Le vocabulaire de Deleuze, Paris: Ellipses, 58

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Akram, Zainab, Faria Saeed Khan, and Samreen Zaheer. 2019. "Deleuze and Guattaris Immanent Plane and Becoming in a Fairy Tale." Global Regional Review, IV (II): 233-242 doi: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-II).25

HARVARD

    HARVARD : AKRAM, Z., KHAN, F. S. & ZAHEER, S. 2019. Deleuze and Guattaris Immanent Plane and Becoming in a Fairy Tale. Global Regional Review, IV, 233-242.

MHRA

    MHRA : Akram, Zainab, Faria Saeed Khan, and Samreen Zaheer. 2019. "Deleuze and Guattaris Immanent Plane and Becoming in a Fairy Tale." Global Regional Review, IV: 233-242

MLA

    MLA : Akram, Zainab, Faria Saeed Khan, and Samreen Zaheer. "Deleuze and Guattaris Immanent Plane and Becoming in a Fairy Tale." Global Regional Review, IV.II (2019): 233-242 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Akram, Zainab, Khan, Faria Saeed, and Zaheer, Samreen (2019), "Deleuze and Guattaris Immanent Plane and Becoming in a Fairy Tale", Global Regional Review, IV (II), 233-242

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Akram, Zainab, Faria Saeed Khan, and Samreen Zaheer. "Deleuze and Guattaris Immanent Plane and Becoming in a Fairy Tale." Global Regional Review IV, no. II (2019): 233-242. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-II).25