United States Intervention and the Following Hegemony in Cuba and Chile: A Critical Appraisal
US hegemony as the result of its interventions in Cuba and Chile is a historical reality. The United States used to be scared that the imposition of Communism had minimized the Americans dominance over there under the policy of nationalization. Although, the United States had tried his luck in Cuba twice, in decades of the 1960s, to vanish communism dangerous roots, but unfortunately faced defeat. Again in the 1970s decade, the United States faced the same threat of communism (in the form of Salvador Allende regime) in Chile. Chile has blessed with such rich mineral resources like Cuba, so the United States also had similarly established its strong hold inform of different significant companies. In order to prevent the power of Salvador Allende and his nationalization policy, the United States had launched a military coup in 1973 that resulted in success that also helps to minimize the communism threats in the region.
-
Cuba, US, Hegemony, Capitalism, Communism, Chile, Intervention
-
(1) Abdul Zahoor Khan
Assistant Professor, Department of History & Pakistan Studies,International Islamic University, Islamabad-Pakistan.
(2) Ahmed Ali
Lecturer, Higher Education Department, KP, Pakistan.
(3) Sajjad Ali
PhD Schoar, Departmen of Political Science,Qurtuba University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
- Alexander, R. J. (1978). The Tragedy of Chile. London: Green-Wood Press.
- Alexander, R. J. (1978). The Tragedy of Chile. London: Green Wood Press.
- Ayala, C. J. (1995). Social and Economic Aspects of Sugar Production in Cuba 1880-1930. Latin American Research Review 30, 95-124.
- Alexander, R. J. (1978). The Tragedy of Chile. London: Green Wood Press.
- Brands, H. (2010). Latin America's Cold War. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
- Benjamin, J. R. (1977). The United States and Cuba: Hegemony and Dependent Development, 1880-1934 (Pitt Latin American Series). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Bonsal, P. (1971). Cuba Castro and the United States. Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press
- Chile and Allende. (1974, September 17)
- Hunt, M. H. (2004). The World Transformed: 1945 to the present. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Jonathan K. J. (1973, November 12).
- Loveman, B. (1988). Chile: The Legacy of Hispanic Capitalism. London: Oxford University Press.
- Louis A. Perez Jr., L. A. (2011).Cuba in the American Imagination Metaphor and the Imperial Ethos. North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press.
- Moran, T. H. (1974). Multinational Corporation and the Politic of Dependence: Copper in Chile. New Jersey: Princeton University press.
- Peace Treaty Signed At Last. (1898, December 11). The New York Times, p. A7.
- Platt, O. H. (April 1901). Our Relation to the People of Cuba and Porto Rico. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
- Perez Jr., L. A. (2011). Cuba in the American Imagination Metaphor and the Imperial Ethos. North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press.
- Pachter, H. M. (1963). Collision Course. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
- Perkin, E. R. & Wright, A. R. (1962). Foreign Relation of United States and Diplomatic Papers. Washington: United States Government Printing office.
- Robinson, W. I. (1997). US Intervention, and Hegemony. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
- Robinson, W. I. (1997). US Intervention, and Hegemony. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
- Scott, E. G. F. (1913). 1862-1934: Chile, Its History and Development. London: T. F. Unwin Ltd.
- Varg, P. A. (1990). America, From Client State to World Power: Six MajorTransitions in United States Foreign Relations. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
- Telegram from the Security of State to the Ambassador in Cuba. ( March 1935). Cuban News Paper, 476.
- Winpenny, T. R. (1995). Milton S.Hershey Ventures in to Cuban Sugar. A Journal of Mid Atlantic Studies 62, 491-502.
Cite this article
-
APA : Khan, A. Z., Ali, A., & Ali, S. (2017). United States Intervention and the Following Hegemony in Cuba and Chile: A Critical Appraisal. Global Regional Review, II(I), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2017(II-I).24
-
CHICAGO : Khan, Abdul Zahoor, Ahmed Ali, and Sajjad Ali. 2017. "United States Intervention and the Following Hegemony in Cuba and Chile: A Critical Appraisal." Global Regional Review, II (I): 343-355 doi: 10.31703/grr.2017(II-I).24
-
HARVARD : KHAN, A. Z., ALI, A. & ALI, S. 2017. United States Intervention and the Following Hegemony in Cuba and Chile: A Critical Appraisal. Global Regional Review, II, 343-355.
-
MHRA : Khan, Abdul Zahoor, Ahmed Ali, and Sajjad Ali. 2017. "United States Intervention and the Following Hegemony in Cuba and Chile: A Critical Appraisal." Global Regional Review, II: 343-355
-
MLA : Khan, Abdul Zahoor, Ahmed Ali, and Sajjad Ali. "United States Intervention and the Following Hegemony in Cuba and Chile: A Critical Appraisal." Global Regional Review, II.I (2017): 343-355 Print.
-
OXFORD : Khan, Abdul Zahoor, Ali, Ahmed, and Ali, Sajjad (2017), "United States Intervention and the Following Hegemony in Cuba and Chile: A Critical Appraisal", Global Regional Review, II (I), 343-355
-
TURABIAN : Khan, Abdul Zahoor, Ahmed Ali, and Sajjad Ali. "United States Intervention and the Following Hegemony in Cuba and Chile: A Critical Appraisal." Global Regional Review II, no. I (2017): 343-355. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2017(II-I).24