ARTICLE

CONNECTING LANGUAGE GENDER LITERACY AND FACEBOOK A CASE STUDY WITH MULTILINGUAL TEENAGERS IN PAKISTAN

24 Pages : 216-224

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).24      10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).24      Published : Mar 2019

Connecting Language, Gender, Literacy and Facebook: A Case Study with Multilingual Teenagers in Pakistan

    The aim of this research is to examine the interrelationship among language, gender, and literacy practices of multiling ual youth on Facebook in Pakistan. The data, c ollec ted primarily thr ough obs er vations , comprised the participants literacy practices on Facebook which was observed for three months. A convenience sampling technique was used for drawing the sample. Ten participants, five boys and five girls, participated in this research. Data analysis reveals that social media is widely used by young boys and girls to exhibit their gendered identity through language choices, content and purpose of using social media. The research is informed by recent research on the ethnogr aphy of digital literacy practices .

    Language, Gender, Literacy, Social Media
    (1) Fakhira Riaz
    Assistant Professor,Department of English,Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Samia Mudassar
    Assistant Professor, Department of English,Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Acar, A. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of online social networking behavior: The case of Facebook. Journal of Website Promotion, 3, 62-83.
  • Adrianson, L. (2001). Gender and computer-mediated communication: Group processes in problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 71-94
  • Almjeld, J. M. (2008). The girls of MySpace: New media as gendered literacy practice and identity construction. PhD dissertation. Bowling Green State University.
  • Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.
  • Brenner, J. (2012). Social networking. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networkingfulldetail.aspx.
  • Buckingham, D., & Bragg, S. (2004).Young People, Sex and the Media: The facts of life? UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Carstensen, T. (2009). Gender trouble in Web 2.0: Gender relations in social network sites, wikis and weblogs. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, (1)1, 106-127.
  • Coad, D. T. (2013). Developing critical literacy and critical thinking through Facebook. Kairos, 18 (1).
  • Coates, J. (2004). Women, Men and Language. 3rd edn. Harlow: Longman.
  • Danet, B., & Herring, S.C. (2007). The multilingual Internet: Language, culture, and communication online. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
  • Duggan, M., Ellison, N., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Mardden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Pew Research Internet Project, Retrieved November 24, 2018 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/
  • Eckert, P, McConnell Ginet, S. (2005). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Facebook. (2013). Key facts. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts
  • Guiller, J., Durndell, A. (2007). Students' linguistic behavior in online discussion groups: Does gender matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2240-2255.
  • Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A., & Kruck, J. (2012). Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 15(2), 91-98.
  • Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the
  • Hermes, J. (2007). Media Representation of Social Structures: Gender. In Eoin Devereux (Ed.), Media Studies Key Issues and Debates. London: Sage
  • Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Pearson
  • Hoy, M. G., & Milne, G. (2010). Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(2), 28-45 http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Ad
  • Huffaker, D.A., & Calvert, S.L., (2005). Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication. 10(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/huffaker.html
  • Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44(5/6), 363-379.
  • Jones, S. (2012). Mapping the Landscape: Gender and the Writing Classroom. Journal of Writing Research 3 (3): 161-79.
  • Junco, R. (2013). Inequalities in Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2328-2336.
  • Kapidzic, S., & Herring, S. C. (2011). Gender, communication, and self-presentation in teen chatrooms revisited: Have patterns changed? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(1), 39-59
  • Koles, B., & Nagy, P. (2012). Facebook usage patterns and school attitudes. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 6(1), 4-17.
  • Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L., (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Teens_Kindness_Cruelty_SNS_Rep ort_Nov_2011_FINAL_110711.pdf
  • Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet and American Life Project.
  • Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 446-458.
  • Maranto, G., & Barton, M. (2010). Paradox and Promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the sociopolitics of social networking in the writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 27, 36-47.
  • McAndrew, F. T., & Jeong, H. S. (2012). Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2359-2365.
  • Muscanell, N. L., & Guadagno, R. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 107-112.
  • Patrick, C. (2013). Perelman, Foucault, and social networking: How Facebook and audience perception can spark critical thinking in the composition classrooms. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from http://www.bgsu.edu/departments/english/cconline/spring2013_special_issue/Patrick/
  • Rideout, V.J., Foehr, U.G., & Roberts D.F. (2010). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED527859.pdf
  • Rose, J., Mackey-Kallis, S., Shyles, L., Barry, K., Biagini, D., Hart, C., & Jack, L. (2012). Face it: The impact of gender on social media images. Communication Quarterly, 60(5), 588-607.
  • Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness to communicate and students' Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 67-75
  • Shepherd, R.P. (2014). Composing Facebook: Digital Literacy and Incoming Writing Transfer in First-Year Composition. PhD thesis. Arizona State University
  • Simpson, P. A., & Stroh, L. K. (2004). Gender differences: emotional expression and feelings of personal inauthenticity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 715.
  • Suciu, G. (2007). Talk-shows-A Reflection of Gender Inequalities? The Round Table Journal of English Studies. Retrieved on February 20, 2013 From www.theroundtable.ro/.../giulia_suciu_talk_shows_a_reflection_of gender_inequalities.doc
  • Sveningsson, E.M. (2007). Doing and undoing gender in a Swedish Internet community. In: Sveningsson Elm, M., Sundén, J. (Eds.), Cyberfeminism in Northern lights. Gender and digital media in a Nordic context. UK: Cambridge University Press. ults_Report_Final_with_toplines.pdf
  • Zuckerberg, M. (2011). The Facebook blog: Our commitment to the Facebook community. Retrieved November 2015 from Facebook Web site https://blog.facebook.com

Cite this article

    APA : Riaz, F., & Mudassar, S. (2019). Connecting Language, Gender, Literacy and Facebook: A Case Study with Multilingual Teenagers in Pakistan. Global Regional Review, IV(I), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).24
    CHICAGO : Riaz, Fakhira, and Samia Mudassar. 2019. "Connecting Language, Gender, Literacy and Facebook: A Case Study with Multilingual Teenagers in Pakistan." Global Regional Review, IV (I): 216-224 doi: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).24
    HARVARD : RIAZ, F. & MUDASSAR, S. 2019. Connecting Language, Gender, Literacy and Facebook: A Case Study with Multilingual Teenagers in Pakistan. Global Regional Review, IV, 216-224.
    MHRA : Riaz, Fakhira, and Samia Mudassar. 2019. "Connecting Language, Gender, Literacy and Facebook: A Case Study with Multilingual Teenagers in Pakistan." Global Regional Review, IV: 216-224
    MLA : Riaz, Fakhira, and Samia Mudassar. "Connecting Language, Gender, Literacy and Facebook: A Case Study with Multilingual Teenagers in Pakistan." Global Regional Review, IV.I (2019): 216-224 Print.
    OXFORD : Riaz, Fakhira and Mudassar, Samia (2019), "Connecting Language, Gender, Literacy and Facebook: A Case Study with Multilingual Teenagers in Pakistan", Global Regional Review, IV (I), 216-224
    TURABIAN : Riaz, Fakhira, and Samia Mudassar. "Connecting Language, Gender, Literacy and Facebook: A Case Study with Multilingual Teenagers in Pakistan." Global Regional Review IV, no. I (2019): 216-224. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-I).24