ARTICLE

ANALYSIS OF QUESTION PAPERS OF PHYSICS ON BLOOM TAXONOMY AT SECONDARY LEVEL

04 Pages : 29-36

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-IV).04      10.31703/grr.2019(IV-IV).04      Published : Dec 2019

Analysis of Question Papers of Physics on Bloom Taxonomy at Secondary Level

    This research reviewed the question-based papers on secondary-school physics on cognitive taxonomy in the Bloom area between 2014 and 2018 and considered that the papers of the BISE Rawalpindi were merely memorized fact tests or all the cognitive domain categories. In this report, the experts have provided different targets in the papers for evaluation purposes. The research population was the question papers of Physics of class 10 since the last five years. The papers were analyzed by a group of five experts. The research tool was the questionnaire which was critically analyzed by the experts and identified the marks allotted to various categories of cognitive domain. Simple percentage method was used to calculate the allotted marks. The major objectives were to analyze the question papers of Physics with reference to knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation.

    Cognitive Domain, Physics Papers, Secondary Level, Bloom Taxonomy
    (1) Javed Iqbal
    Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Development, Karakoram International University (KIU), Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.
    (2) Obaid Ullah
    Lecturer, Department of Education, NUML, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (3) Muhammad Nisar
    Principal, Model High School, Shakardarra, Kohat, KP, Pakistan.
  • Aggarwal Y. (1997). Essentials of Examination System: Evaluation Tests and Measurement. Vikas, New Delhi.
  • Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educa6onal Objec6ves, Handbook I: The Cogni6ve Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
  • Bloom, B.S. (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York; Toronto: Longmans
  • Bloom B.S. Bertram B. M, and. Krathwoh, D.R. (1964). Taxonomy of Educa6onal Objec6ves (two vols:The Affec6ve Domain & The Cogni6ve Domain). New York. David McKay
  • Bumen, N. T. (2007). Effects of the original versus revised bloom's taxonomy on lesson planning skills: ATurkish study among pre-service teachers. Review of Education.
  • Christie, T. & Afzaal, M. (2005). Rote Memorization as a SufficientExplanation of Secondary School Examination Achievement in Pakistan: An Empirical Investigation of a Widespread Assumption., Paper Presented in the conference Assessment and the future schooling and learning held in Abuja, Nigeria. Retrieved from:http://www.aku.edu/AKUEB/pdfs/IAEA05.pdf (Accessed:27/12/2011)
  • Dave, R.H. (1969).
  • Eber, P. A., & Parker, T. S. (2007). Assessing student learning: applying Bloom's Taxonomy. Human Service Education
  • Jafri, S. I & Arain, A. A (2002). Assessment of instructional objectives in boards, Examination papers inphysics: Cognitive development at secondary level in Pakistan, University of Sindh, Pakistan
  • Hargreaves, D. (2004) Learning for Life: The founda6ons of lifelong learning. Bristol: The Policy Press
  • Khan, S. (2006). An evaluation of the exercises provided in the English compulsory textbook for class X, [Unpublished MA dissertation] Faculty of English Linguistics, University of Karachi
  • Mirza, M., Nosheen M., & Masood N. (1999). Impact of Examination System on TeachingStyles of Teachers at Secondary and Higher Secondary Classes,Lahore: Institute ofEducation and Research, University of the Punja
  • Rowntree, D. (1977) Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them? (1) London: Harper and Row.
  • Srivastava, H.S. (1979). Examination Reforms, UNESCO, Paris.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Iqbal, Javed, Obaid Ullah, and Muhammad Nisar. 2019. "Analysis of Question Papers of Physics on Bloom Taxonomy at Secondary Level." Global Regional Review, IV (IV): 29-36 doi: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-IV).04
    HARVARD : IQBAL, J., ULLAH, O. & NISAR, M. 2019. Analysis of Question Papers of Physics on Bloom Taxonomy at Secondary Level. Global Regional Review, IV, 29-36.
    MHRA : Iqbal, Javed, Obaid Ullah, and Muhammad Nisar. 2019. "Analysis of Question Papers of Physics on Bloom Taxonomy at Secondary Level." Global Regional Review, IV: 29-36
    MLA : Iqbal, Javed, Obaid Ullah, and Muhammad Nisar. "Analysis of Question Papers of Physics on Bloom Taxonomy at Secondary Level." Global Regional Review, IV.IV (2019): 29-36 Print.
    OXFORD : Iqbal, Javed, Ullah, Obaid, and Nisar, Muhammad (2019), "Analysis of Question Papers of Physics on Bloom Taxonomy at Secondary Level", Global Regional Review, IV (IV), 29-36
    TURABIAN : Iqbal, Javed, Obaid Ullah, and Muhammad Nisar. "Analysis of Question Papers of Physics on Bloom Taxonomy at Secondary Level." Global Regional Review IV, no. IV (2019): 29-36. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-IV).04