References
- Anderson, M. R. (1993). Islamic law and the colonial encounter in British India. Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader, 15(10), 165.
- Anjum, T. (2009). Sons of Bread and Sons of Soul: Lineal and Spiritual Descendants of BÄÂbÄ FarÄ«d and the issue of succession. In S. S. and I. D. Gaur (Ed.), Sufism in Punjab: Mystics, Literature and Shrines (pp. 63-79). AAKAR Books.
- Benton, L. (2002). Law and colonial cultures: Legal regimes in world history, 1400-1900. Cambridge University Press.
- Bigelow, A. B. (2004). Sharing saints, shrines, and stories: Practicing pluralism in North India. University of California, Santa Barbara.
- Calder, N. (n.d.). Taḳlīd. In Encyclopaedia of Islam (2nd ed.). Brill. Civil suit No. 4 of 1886 dated May 25, 1886.
- Eaton, R. M. (1982). Court of Man, Court of God: Local Perceptions of the Shrine of Baba Farid, Pakpattan, Punjab. Journal of Developing Societies, 17(44).
- Eaton, R. M. (1984). The Political and Religious Authority of the Shrine of BÄÂbÄ FarÄ«d in Pakpattan, Punjab. Moral Conduct and Authority: The Place of Adab in South Asian Islam, 333-356.
- Ewing, K. (1983). The politics of Sufism: Redefining the saints of Pakistan. The Journal of Asian Studies, 42(2), 251-268.
- Fyzee, A. A. A. (1963). Muhammadan Law in India. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5(4), 401-415.
- Gilmartin, D. (1988). Empire and Islam: Punjab and the making of Pakistan. University of California Press Berkeley.
- Hunter, W. W. (1887). Religions of India. RSA Journal, 36, 401.
- Inquiry Report dated April 30, 2001. (n.d.).
- Judgment (1942), by the Privy Council.
- Judgment dated April 10, 1890, by the Chief Court Punjab.
- Judgment dated April 28, 1888, by District Judge Montgomery.
- Judgment dated December 2, 1938, by the Sub-Judge, First Class, Montgomery.
- Judgment dated July 19, 1993, by the Court of Civil Judge Class II, Pakpattan.
- Judgment dated May 29, 2006, by the Lahore High Court Lahore
- Judgment dated May 6, 1941, by the Chief Court Punjab.
- Judgment dated May 8, 1996, by the Additional District Judge Sahiwal.
- Judgment dated November 6, 1894, by the Privy Council
- Judgment dated October 29, 2007, by the Lahore High Court, Lahore.
- Kugle, S. A. (2001). Framed, blamed and renamed: the recasting of Islamic jurisprudence in colonial South Asia. Modern Asian Studies, 35(2), 257- 313.
- Liebesny, H. J. (1967). Stability and Change in Islamic Law. Middle East Journal, 21(1), 16-34.
- Masud, M. K. (n.d.). Anglo-Muhammadan law. In Encyclopaedia of Islam (3rd ed.). Brill.
- Metcalf, T. R. (1997). Ideologies of the Raj 4. Cambridge University Press.
- Muhammad Mubeen. (2015). Evolution of the Chishtī shrine and the Chishtīs in Pakpattan (Pakistan). In Devotional Islam in Contemporary South Asia (pp. 119-137). Routledge.
- Mulla, S. D. F. (1907). Principles of Mahomedan Law. Thacker Spink.
- Order No. SOP 5(17) 1, January 16, 2007, Office of the Chief Administrator AuqÄÂf Punjab Lahore.
- Order No. SOP 5(17)A dated May 30, 2006, Office of the Chief Administrator Auqaf Punjab Lahore.
- Singha, R. (2000). A despotism of law: Crime and justice in early colonial India. Oxford University Press.
- Anderson, M. R. (1993). Islamic law and the colonial encounter in British India. Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader, 15(10), 165.
- Anjum, T. (2009). Sons of Bread and Sons of Soul: Lineal and Spiritual Descendants of BÄÂbÄ FarÄ«d and the issue of succession. In S. S. and I. D. Gaur (Ed.), Sufism in Punjab: Mystics, Literature and Shrines (pp. 63-79). AAKAR Books.
- Benton, L. (2002). Law and colonial cultures: Legal regimes in world history, 1400-1900. Cambridge University Press.
- Bigelow, A. B. (2004). Sharing saints, shrines, and stories: Practicing pluralism in North India. University of California, Santa Barbara.
- Calder, N. (n.d.). Taḳlīd. In Encyclopaedia of Islam (2nd ed.). Brill. Civil suit No. 4 of 1886 dated May 25, 1886.
- Eaton, R. M. (1982). Court of Man, Court of God: Local Perceptions of the Shrine of Baba Farid, Pakpattan, Punjab. Journal of Developing Societies, 17(44).
- Eaton, R. M. (1984). The Political and Religious Authority of the Shrine of BÄÂbÄ FarÄ«d in Pakpattan, Punjab. Moral Conduct and Authority: The Place of Adab in South Asian Islam, 333-356.
- Ewing, K. (1983). The politics of Sufism: Redefining the saints of Pakistan. The Journal of Asian Studies, 42(2), 251-268.
- Fyzee, A. A. A. (1963). Muhammadan Law in India. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5(4), 401-415.
- Gilmartin, D. (1988). Empire and Islam: Punjab and the making of Pakistan. University of California Press Berkeley.
- Hunter, W. W. (1887). Religions of India. RSA Journal, 36, 401.
- Inquiry Report dated April 30, 2001. (n.d.).
- Judgment (1942), by the Privy Council.
- Judgment dated April 10, 1890, by the Chief Court Punjab.
- Judgment dated April 28, 1888, by District Judge Montgomery.
- Judgment dated December 2, 1938, by the Sub-Judge, First Class, Montgomery.
- Judgment dated July 19, 1993, by the Court of Civil Judge Class II, Pakpattan.
- Judgment dated May 29, 2006, by the Lahore High Court Lahore
- Judgment dated May 6, 1941, by the Chief Court Punjab.
- Judgment dated May 8, 1996, by the Additional District Judge Sahiwal.
- Judgment dated November 6, 1894, by the Privy Council
- Judgment dated October 29, 2007, by the Lahore High Court, Lahore.
- Kugle, S. A. (2001). Framed, blamed and renamed: the recasting of Islamic jurisprudence in colonial South Asia. Modern Asian Studies, 35(2), 257- 313.
- Liebesny, H. J. (1967). Stability and Change in Islamic Law. Middle East Journal, 21(1), 16-34.
- Masud, M. K. (n.d.). Anglo-Muhammadan law. In Encyclopaedia of Islam (3rd ed.). Brill.
- Metcalf, T. R. (1997). Ideologies of the Raj 4. Cambridge University Press.
- Muhammad Mubeen. (2015). Evolution of the Chishtī shrine and the Chishtīs in Pakpattan (Pakistan). In Devotional Islam in Contemporary South Asia (pp. 119-137). Routledge.
- Mulla, S. D. F. (1907). Principles of Mahomedan Law. Thacker Spink.
- Order No. SOP 5(17) 1, January 16, 2007, Office of the Chief Administrator AuqÄÂf Punjab Lahore.
- Order No. SOP 5(17)A dated May 30, 2006, Office of the Chief Administrator Auqaf Punjab Lahore.
- Singha, R. (2000). A despotism of law: Crime and justice in early colonial India. Oxford University Press.
Cite this article
-
APA : Mubeen, M. (2017). The Modern State and the Contestation of Succession in Sacred Spaces: Examining the Local Moral Authority of the Shrine of Baba Farid in Pakpattan (Punjab-Pakistan). Global Regional Review, II(I), 454-470. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2017(II-I).33
-
CHICAGO : Mubeen, Muhammad. 2017. "The Modern State and the Contestation of Succession in Sacred Spaces: Examining the Local Moral Authority of the Shrine of Baba Farid in Pakpattan (Punjab-Pakistan)." Global Regional Review, II (I): 454-470 doi: 10.31703/grr.2017(II-I).33
-
HARVARD : MUBEEN, M. 2017. The Modern State and the Contestation of Succession in Sacred Spaces: Examining the Local Moral Authority of the Shrine of Baba Farid in Pakpattan (Punjab-Pakistan). Global Regional Review, II, 454-470.
-
MHRA : Mubeen, Muhammad. 2017. "The Modern State and the Contestation of Succession in Sacred Spaces: Examining the Local Moral Authority of the Shrine of Baba Farid in Pakpattan (Punjab-Pakistan)." Global Regional Review, II: 454-470
-
MLA : Mubeen, Muhammad. "The Modern State and the Contestation of Succession in Sacred Spaces: Examining the Local Moral Authority of the Shrine of Baba Farid in Pakpattan (Punjab-Pakistan)." Global Regional Review, II.I (2017): 454-470 Print.
-
OXFORD : Mubeen, Muhammad (2017), "The Modern State and the Contestation of Succession in Sacred Spaces: Examining the Local Moral Authority of the Shrine of Baba Farid in Pakpattan (Punjab-Pakistan)", Global Regional Review, II (I), 454-470
-
TURABIAN : Mubeen, Muhammad. "The Modern State and the Contestation of Succession in Sacred Spaces: Examining the Local Moral Authority of the Shrine of Baba Farid in Pakpattan (Punjab-Pakistan)." Global Regional Review II, no. I (2017): 454-470. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2017(II-I).33