References

• Asad, M. M., Rind, A. A., Khand, Z. H., Rind, I. A., & Mughal, S. H. (2020). Curriculum upgradation practices among higher education institutions of Pakistan: does curriculum ideologies make difference?. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.
• Aslam, S., & Ali, M. S. (2017). Effect of Self-Efficacy on Students'achievement in Science: A Case of Secondary School Students in Pakistan. European Journal of Education Studies.
• Anwer, M., Iqbal, H. M., & Harrison, C. (2012). Students' attitude towards science: A case of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 3-9.
• Alshammari, A. (2013). Curriculum Implementation and Reform: Teachers' Views about Kuwait's New Science Curriculum. Online Submission, 3(3), 181-186
• Allen, S., & Peterman, K. (2019). Evaluating informal STEM education: Issues and challenges in context. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161), 17-33.
• Awan, R. U. N., Sarwar, M., Mehdi, M., Noureen, G., & Anwar, N. (2017). Interests and Recruitment in Science: Factors Influencing Recruitment and Retention in STEM Education at University Level in Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(3), 19-43.
• Bashri, A., Puspitawati, R. P., & Ibrahim, M. (2018, December). Curriculum Implementation in Biology Program of Universitas Negeri Surabaya. In International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018). Atlantis Press.
• Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2012). An international perspective on science curriculum development and implementation. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 771-782). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Grønmo, S. (2019). Social research methods: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
• Halai, N. (2003). Munazza's story: Understanding science teaching and conceptions of the nature of science in Pakistan through a life history study.
• Hoodbhoy, P. (2014). Education reform in Pakistan- Challenges and prospects. Pakistan: Haunting Shadows of Human Security, edited by Jennifer Bennett, 58.
• Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education-a pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1459-1483.
• Iqbal, P., & Almani, A. S. (2018). Secondary School Curriculum In Pakistan: A Challenging Educational Issue. Grassroots, 48(2).
• Ituma, G. M. (2012). Analysis of school based chemistry assessment used in secondary schools in Kajiado north district, Kenya. Unpublished Master of Education Thesis, Kenyatta University.
• Kausar, S. (2017). Education Policies in Pakistan: Politics, Projections, and Practices (2015) By Dr. Shahid Siddiqui. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4(1), 142-145.
• Millar, R. (2011). Reviewing the National Curriculum for science: opportunities and challenges. Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 167-185.
• Memon, G. R. (2007). Education in Pakistan: The key issues, problems and the new challenges. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 3(1), 47-55.
• Ottevanger, W. J. W. (2001). Teacher support materials as a catalyst for science curriculum implementation in Namibia. Enschede: University of Twente.
• Peers, C. S. E., Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2003). Supports and concerns for teacher professional growth during the implementation of a science curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 89-110.
• Penuel, W. R., Phillips, R. S., & Harris, C. J. (2014). Analyzing teachers' curriculum implementation from integrity and actororiented perspectives. Journal of Curriculum studies, 46(6), 751-777.
• Rind, A. A., & Mughal, S. H. (2020). An Analysis of Pakistan's National Curriculum of Mathematics at Secondary level. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology, 1(1), 39-42.
• Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational High School Teachers' Difficulties in Implementing the Assessment in Curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33-48.
• Rogan, J. M., & Grayson, D. J. (2003). Towards a theory of curriculum implementation with particular reference to science education in developing countries. International journal of science education, 25(10), 1171-1204.
• Shah, K., Ahmad, N., & Khan, N. (2019). Analysis of National Education Policies: Issues and Challenges in Pakistan and Development of Science Education. Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow Volume 19: 11 November 2019 ISSN 1930, 2940, 77.
• Sharp, J. G., Hopkin, R., & Lewthwaite, B. (2011). Teacher Perceptions of Science in the National Curriculum: Findings from an application of the Science Curriculum Implementation Questionnaire in English primary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2407-2436.
• Ullah, R., Ullah, H., & Allender, T. (2020). Girls Underperforming in Science: Evidences from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Elementary Education, 29(2), 1-14.
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Ries, R., Poland, D., & Avery, L. D. (1998). A national study of science curriculum effectiveness with high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(4), 200-211.