ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY IN DEVELOPING ORAL FLUENCY AMONG INTERMEDIATE STUDENTS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).48      10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).48      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : Mahnoor Zahra , Tanveer Hussain , Deeba Shahwar

48 Pages : 442- 459

References

  • Gillepsie, H. (2006). Unlocking learning and teaching with ICT: Identifying and overcoming barriers. London: David Fulton.
  • Ozreol, G. (2009). Perceptions of EFL primary school teachers towards CALL. Unpublished MA thesis, Cukurova University, Turkey.
  • Dunkel, P. (1990). Implications of the CAI effectiveness research for limited English proficient learners. Computers in the Schools, 7(1/2), 301-321.
  • Braul, B. (2006). ESL teacher perceptions and attitudes toward using computer-assisted language learning (CALL): Recommendations for effective CALL practice. Unpublished MA Thesis, Department of Secondary Education, Edmonton, Alberta.
  • Rodinadze, S., & Zarbazoia, K. (2012). The advantage of information technology in teaching English language.Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 3(5), 271-275.
  • Riasati, M.J., Allahyar, N., & Tan, K-E. (2012). Technology in language education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25-30.
  • Lin, W., & Yang, S. (2011). Exploring students' perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88-103.
  • Parvin, R.H., & Salam, S.F. (2015). The effectiveness of using technology in English language classrooms in government primary schools in Bangladesh. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 2(1), 47- 59.
  • Galavis, B. (1998). ‘Computers and EFL class: Their advantage and possible outcome, the autonomous learner', English Teaching Forum vol. 36(4), 27.
  • Bulut, O., &Delen, E. (2011). The relationship between students' exposure to technology and their achievement in science and maths. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3)

References

  • Gillepsie, H. (2006). Unlocking learning and teaching with ICT: Identifying and overcoming barriers. London: David Fulton.
  • Ozreol, G. (2009). Perceptions of EFL primary school teachers towards CALL. Unpublished MA thesis, Cukurova University, Turkey.
  • Dunkel, P. (1990). Implications of the CAI effectiveness research for limited English proficient learners. Computers in the Schools, 7(1/2), 301-321.
  • Braul, B. (2006). ESL teacher perceptions and attitudes toward using computer-assisted language learning (CALL): Recommendations for effective CALL practice. Unpublished MA Thesis, Department of Secondary Education, Edmonton, Alberta.
  • Rodinadze, S., & Zarbazoia, K. (2012). The advantage of information technology in teaching English language.Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 3(5), 271-275.
  • Riasati, M.J., Allahyar, N., & Tan, K-E. (2012). Technology in language education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25-30.
  • Lin, W., & Yang, S. (2011). Exploring students' perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88-103.
  • Parvin, R.H., & Salam, S.F. (2015). The effectiveness of using technology in English language classrooms in government primary schools in Bangladesh. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 2(1), 47- 59.
  • Galavis, B. (1998). ‘Computers and EFL class: Their advantage and possible outcome, the autonomous learner', English Teaching Forum vol. 36(4), 27.
  • Bulut, O., &Delen, E. (2011). The relationship between students' exposure to technology and their achievement in science and maths. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3)

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Zahra, M., Hussain, T., & Shahwar, D. (2020). Role of Technology in Developing Oral Fluency among Intermediate Students. Global Regional Review, V(I), 442- 459. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).48

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Zahra, Mahnoor, Tanveer Hussain, and Deeba Shahwar. 2020. "Role of Technology in Developing Oral Fluency among Intermediate Students." Global Regional Review, V (I): 442- 459 doi: 10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).48

HARVARD

    HARVARD : ZAHRA, M., HUSSAIN, T. & SHAHWAR, D. 2020. Role of Technology in Developing Oral Fluency among Intermediate Students. Global Regional Review, V, 442- 459.

MHRA

    MHRA : Zahra, Mahnoor, Tanveer Hussain, and Deeba Shahwar. 2020. "Role of Technology in Developing Oral Fluency among Intermediate Students." Global Regional Review, V: 442- 459

MLA

    MLA : Zahra, Mahnoor, Tanveer Hussain, and Deeba Shahwar. "Role of Technology in Developing Oral Fluency among Intermediate Students." Global Regional Review, V.I (2020): 442- 459 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Zahra, Mahnoor, Hussain, Tanveer, and Shahwar, Deeba (2020), "Role of Technology in Developing Oral Fluency among Intermediate Students", Global Regional Review, V (I), 442- 459

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Zahra, Mahnoor, Tanveer Hussain, and Deeba Shahwar. "Role of Technology in Developing Oral Fluency among Intermediate Students." Global Regional Review V, no. I (2020): 442- 459. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).48