References
- African Charter on Human and People Rights, 1981
- American Convention on Human Rights, 1969.
- Avocats Sans Frontieres v. Burundi, Comm. 231/99 (2000).
- Brozicek v. Italy, (1989) ECHR 23, 10964/84.
- Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, (1985) 7 EHRR 165.
- Campbell v. Jamaica, Comm. 248/1987, (HRC 1992).
- Clooney, A., & Webb, P. (2021). The Right to a Fair Trial in International Law. Oxford University Press, USA.
- Convention against torture and other Cruel Inhuman or degrading treatment or Punishment, 1984.
- D. Wolf v. Panama, Comm. 289/1988, (HRC 1992).
- Estrella v. Uruguay. Communication 74/1980, UNHRC (1983).
- European Convention on Human Rights, 1950.
- Golder v. UK (1976) 1 EHRR 524.
- Gradinger v. Austria, 15963/90 (1995).
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966
- Liaqat Ali Chugtai v. Federation of Pakistan, 2012 PLC CS 1062 Lahore
- Lobo Machado v. Portugal, (1996) 23 EHRR 79.
- Maleki v. Italy, UNHRC (1999).
- Oliveira v. Switzerland, (84/1997/868/1080) 1998.
- Palaoro v. Austria, (1995) ECHR 37
- Sergio Euben Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay, Communication R.12/52, (1981).
- Sobko, G., Muliar, G., Draliuk, I., Hryhorchuk, M., Holovko, O., & Lvova, I. (2021). Gaps, conflicts, and contradictions regarding measures to ensure the right to a fair trial of the convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1968-1984.
- Statute of International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and former Yugoslavia, 1993.
- The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.
- The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998
- The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, 1993
- UN Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors, 1990.
- Wheeler, C. H. (2018). The Right to Be Present at Trial in International Criminal Law. Brill.
- African Charter on Human and People Rights, 1981
- American Convention on Human Rights, 1969.
- Avocats Sans Frontieres v. Burundi, Comm. 231/99 (2000).
- Brozicek v. Italy, (1989) ECHR 23, 10964/84.
- Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, (1985) 7 EHRR 165.
- Campbell v. Jamaica, Comm. 248/1987, (HRC 1992).
- Clooney, A., & Webb, P. (2021). The Right to a Fair Trial in International Law. Oxford University Press, USA.
- Convention against torture and other Cruel Inhuman or degrading treatment or Punishment, 1984.
- D. Wolf v. Panama, Comm. 289/1988, (HRC 1992).
- Estrella v. Uruguay. Communication 74/1980, UNHRC (1983).
- European Convention on Human Rights, 1950.
- Golder v. UK (1976) 1 EHRR 524.
- Gradinger v. Austria, 15963/90 (1995).
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966
- Liaqat Ali Chugtai v. Federation of Pakistan, 2012 PLC CS 1062 Lahore
- Lobo Machado v. Portugal, (1996) 23 EHRR 79.
- Maleki v. Italy, UNHRC (1999).
- Oliveira v. Switzerland, (84/1997/868/1080) 1998.
- Palaoro v. Austria, (1995) ECHR 37
- Sergio Euben Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay, Communication R.12/52, (1981).
- Sobko, G., Muliar, G., Draliuk, I., Hryhorchuk, M., Holovko, O., & Lvova, I. (2021). Gaps, conflicts, and contradictions regarding measures to ensure the right to a fair trial of the convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1968-1984.
- Statute of International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and former Yugoslavia, 1993.
- The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.
- The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998
- The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, 1993
- UN Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors, 1990.
- Wheeler, C. H. (2018). The Right to Be Present at Trial in International Criminal Law. Brill.
Cite this article
-
APA : Hussain, A., Khadim, M. N., & Khanam, L. (2021). Rights of Accused at Trial Stage: An Analytical Study of Intentional Rules and Legal System of Pakistan. Global Regional Review, VI(I), 307 - 313. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2021(VI-I).33
-
CHICAGO : Hussain, Amjad, Muhammad Naeem Khadim, and Latiba Khanam. 2021. "Rights of Accused at Trial Stage: An Analytical Study of Intentional Rules and Legal System of Pakistan." Global Regional Review, VI (I): 307 - 313 doi: 10.31703/grr.2021(VI-I).33
-
HARVARD : HUSSAIN, A., KHADIM, M. N. & KHANAM, L. 2021. Rights of Accused at Trial Stage: An Analytical Study of Intentional Rules and Legal System of Pakistan. Global Regional Review, VI, 307 - 313.
-
MHRA : Hussain, Amjad, Muhammad Naeem Khadim, and Latiba Khanam. 2021. "Rights of Accused at Trial Stage: An Analytical Study of Intentional Rules and Legal System of Pakistan." Global Regional Review, VI: 307 - 313
-
MLA : Hussain, Amjad, Muhammad Naeem Khadim, and Latiba Khanam. "Rights of Accused at Trial Stage: An Analytical Study of Intentional Rules and Legal System of Pakistan." Global Regional Review, VI.I (2021): 307 - 313 Print.
-
OXFORD : Hussain, Amjad, Khadim, Muhammad Naeem, and Khanam, Latiba (2021), "Rights of Accused at Trial Stage: An Analytical Study of Intentional Rules and Legal System of Pakistan", Global Regional Review, VI (I), 307 - 313
-
TURABIAN : Hussain, Amjad, Muhammad Naeem Khadim, and Latiba Khanam. "Rights of Accused at Trial Stage: An Analytical Study of Intentional Rules and Legal System of Pakistan." Global Regional Review VI, no. I (2021): 307 - 313. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2021(VI-I).33