GRR - Global Regional Review

PORTRAYAL OF VICTIMS OF GLOBAL CONFLICT IN US INDIAN AND PAKISTANI PRESS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).43 10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).43
Authored by : Yasar Arafat , Rooh Ul AminKhan , Muhammad AtifShehzad

43 Pages : 396-402

References

Afzal, N. (2016). Elements of Pathos and Media Framing as Scientific Discourse: A Newspaper Perspective on Rohingya Crisis. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Science, 3(6), 89-99.
Averre, D., & Davies, L. (2015). Russia, humanitarian intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: the case of Syria. International Affairs, 91(4), 813-834.
Bahador, B. (2011). Mapping the Enemy Image through Different Conflict Stages. School of Social and Political Sciences. University of Canterbury. Christchurch.
Bajoria, J., & McMahon, R. (2013). The dilemma of humanitarian intervention. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 154-178.
Betz, M. (2011). Conflict Sensitive Journalism: Moving Towards a Holistic Framework. International Media Support.
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy: University of Chicago Press.
Gibbs, D. N. (2009). First do no harm: Humanitarian intervention and the destruction of Yugoslavia: Vanderbilt University Press.
Hawkins, V. (2016). Stealth conflicts: How the world's worst violence is ignored: Routledge
Islam, M. K. (2018). How Newspapers In China, India And Bangladesh Framed The Rohingya Crisis Of 2017.
Morris, J. (2013). Libya and Syria: R2P and the Spectre of the Swinging Pendulum. International Affairs, 89(5), 1265-1283.
Orford, A. (2003). Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law (Vol. 30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reisman, W. M. (1984). Coercion and Self-Determination: Construing Charter Article 2 (4). American Journal of International Law, 78(3), 642-645.
Roff, K. L. (2013). Barbaric Mistakes: Western Print Media's Portrayal of
Walzer, M. (2004). The Argument about Humanitarian Intervention. Ethics of Humanitarian Interventions, 7, 7- 21.

References

Afzal, N. (2016). Elements of Pathos and Media Framing as Scientific Discourse: A Newspaper Perspective on Rohingya Crisis. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Science, 3(6), 89-99.
Averre, D., & Davies, L. (2015). Russia, humanitarian intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: the case of Syria. International Affairs, 91(4), 813-834.
Bahador, B. (2011). Mapping the Enemy Image through Different Conflict Stages. School of Social and Political Sciences. University of Canterbury. Christchurch.
Bajoria, J., & McMahon, R. (2013). The dilemma of humanitarian intervention. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 154-178.
Betz, M. (2011). Conflict Sensitive Journalism: Moving Towards a Holistic Framework. International Media Support.
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy: University of Chicago Press.
Gibbs, D. N. (2009). First do no harm: Humanitarian intervention and the destruction of Yugoslavia: Vanderbilt University Press.
Hawkins, V. (2016). Stealth conflicts: How the world's worst violence is ignored: Routledge
Islam, M. K. (2018). How Newspapers In China, India And Bangladesh Framed The Rohingya Crisis Of 2017.
Morris, J. (2013). Libya and Syria: R2P and the Spectre of the Swinging Pendulum. International Affairs, 89(5), 1265-1283.
Orford, A. (2003). Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law (Vol. 30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reisman, W. M. (1984). Coercion and Self-Determination: Construing Charter Article 2 (4). American Journal of International Law, 78(3), 642-645.
Roff, K. L. (2013). Barbaric Mistakes: Western Print Media's Portrayal of
Walzer, M. (2004). The Argument about Humanitarian Intervention. Ethics of Humanitarian Interventions, 7, 7- 21.