GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF LEXICAL FEATURES IN TEXT MESSAGING OF PAKISTANI STUDENTS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2022(VII-I).09      10.31703/grr.2022(VII-I).09      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : Kiran Jahanzeb , Humaira Irfan , Jahanzeb Jahan

09 Pages : 80 - 89

References

  • Anis, J. (2007). Neography: Unconventional spelling in French SMS text messages. The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online, 87-115
  • Coates, J. (1993). Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language: Longman.
  • Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in relationships.
  • Herring, S. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In Tannen, D. Schiffrin, D.& Hamilton, H. (Ed.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 612-634, Oxford: Blackwell. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/cm d.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (1994). Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 278-294). Berkeley Women and Language Group. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/poli teness.1994.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (1996). Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 81-108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/2va riants.1996.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (1998). Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. College Composition and Communication, 50(2), 295. https://doi.org/10.2307/358527
  • Herring, S. C. (2000). Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Journal, 18(1). http://www.cpsr.org/issues/womeninte ch/herring/
  • Herring, S. C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 109-168. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/aris t.2002.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. The Handbook of Language and Gender, 202-228. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/gen der.power.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender, 202-228, Oxford:Blackwell.Publishers., http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/cm da.pdf
  • Herring, S. C., & Martinson, A. (2004). Assessing Gender Authenticity in Computer-Mediated Language Use. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 424-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x042695 86
  • Herring, S. C., & Paolillo, J. C. (2006). Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9841.2006.00287.x
  • Herring, S. C., & Zelenkauskaite, A. (2008). Gendered typography: Abbreviation and insertion in Italian iTV SMS. In J. F. Siegel, T. C. Nagel, A. LaurenteLapole, & J. Auger (Eds.), IUWPL7: Gender in language: Classic questions, new contexts, 73-92, Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/iuw pl.2008.pdf
  • Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men, and Politeness. Longman
  • Kaul, A. (1998). Business Communication. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.
  • Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(01), 45-79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166707?or igin=JSTOR-pdf
  • Poynton, C. (1989). Language and gender: Making the difference Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Men and women in conversation. New York: Williams Morrow. https://www.amazon.in/You-Just-Dont-Understand- Conversation/dp/0091826144?asin=1853 814717

References

  • Anis, J. (2007). Neography: Unconventional spelling in French SMS text messages. The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online, 87-115
  • Coates, J. (1993). Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language: Longman.
  • Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in relationships.
  • Herring, S. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In Tannen, D. Schiffrin, D.& Hamilton, H. (Ed.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 612-634, Oxford: Blackwell. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/cm d.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (1994). Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 278-294). Berkeley Women and Language Group. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/poli teness.1994.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (1996). Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 81-108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/2va riants.1996.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (1998). Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. College Composition and Communication, 50(2), 295. https://doi.org/10.2307/358527
  • Herring, S. C. (2000). Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Journal, 18(1). http://www.cpsr.org/issues/womeninte ch/herring/
  • Herring, S. C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 109-168. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/aris t.2002.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. The Handbook of Language and Gender, 202-228. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/gen der.power.pdf
  • Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender, 202-228, Oxford:Blackwell.Publishers., http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/cm da.pdf
  • Herring, S. C., & Martinson, A. (2004). Assessing Gender Authenticity in Computer-Mediated Language Use. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 424-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x042695 86
  • Herring, S. C., & Paolillo, J. C. (2006). Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9841.2006.00287.x
  • Herring, S. C., & Zelenkauskaite, A. (2008). Gendered typography: Abbreviation and insertion in Italian iTV SMS. In J. F. Siegel, T. C. Nagel, A. LaurenteLapole, & J. Auger (Eds.), IUWPL7: Gender in language: Classic questions, new contexts, 73-92, Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/iuw pl.2008.pdf
  • Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men, and Politeness. Longman
  • Kaul, A. (1998). Business Communication. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.
  • Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(01), 45-79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166707?or igin=JSTOR-pdf
  • Poynton, C. (1989). Language and gender: Making the difference Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Men and women in conversation. New York: Williams Morrow. https://www.amazon.in/You-Just-Dont-Understand- Conversation/dp/0091826144?asin=1853 814717

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Jahanzeb, K., Irfan, H., & Jahan, J. (2022). Gender Differences in the Use of Lexical Features in Text Messaging of Pakistani Students. Global Regional Review, VII(I), 80 - 89. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2022(VII-I).09

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Jahanzeb, Kiran, Humaira Irfan, and Jahanzeb Jahan. 2022. "Gender Differences in the Use of Lexical Features in Text Messaging of Pakistani Students." Global Regional Review, VII (I): 80 - 89 doi: 10.31703/grr.2022(VII-I).09

HARVARD

    HARVARD : JAHANZEB, K., IRFAN, H. & JAHAN, J. 2022. Gender Differences in the Use of Lexical Features in Text Messaging of Pakistani Students. Global Regional Review, VII, 80 - 89.

MHRA

    MHRA : Jahanzeb, Kiran, Humaira Irfan, and Jahanzeb Jahan. 2022. "Gender Differences in the Use of Lexical Features in Text Messaging of Pakistani Students." Global Regional Review, VII: 80 - 89

MLA

    MLA : Jahanzeb, Kiran, Humaira Irfan, and Jahanzeb Jahan. "Gender Differences in the Use of Lexical Features in Text Messaging of Pakistani Students." Global Regional Review, VII.I (2022): 80 - 89 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Jahanzeb, Kiran, Irfan, Humaira, and Jahan, Jahanzeb (2022), "Gender Differences in the Use of Lexical Features in Text Messaging of Pakistani Students", Global Regional Review, VII (I), 80 - 89

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Jahanzeb, Kiran, Humaira Irfan, and Jahanzeb Jahan. "Gender Differences in the Use of Lexical Features in Text Messaging of Pakistani Students." Global Regional Review VII, no. I (2022): 80 - 89. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2022(VII-I).09