EXPLORING INBETWEENNESS AFTER THE LOSS OF TRANSCENDENTAL SIGNIFIER AND REVERSAL OF BINARY ROLES IN ANTON CHEKOVS THE CHERRY ORCHARD

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2022(VII-II).27      10.31703/grr.2022(VII-II).27      Published : Jun 2
Authored by : Irum Iqbal , Ahmad Naeem , Muhammad Mahmood Ahmad Shaheen

27 Pages : 284-290

References

  • Bartlett, J. (2005). Freedom and Self- Knowledge in the Dramatic Works of Anton Chekhov. University of Missouri, Columbia, Doctoral Dissertation. 1-29 https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/4229
  • Bera, K. (2013). “Anton Chekhov and the Theatre of the Absurd”. Lapis Lazuli: An International Literary Journal (LLILJ), 3(1), 1-8
  • Bertens, H. (2013). Literary Theory: The Basics (3rd ed.). Routledge https://www.routledge.com/Literary-Theory-The-Basics/Bertens/p/book/9780415538077
  • Borny, G. (2006). Interpreting Chekhov. The Australian National University Press https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbjpn
  • Chekov, A. (2015). The Cherry Orchard: A Comedy in Four Acts. 1-16 https://books.google.com.pk/books/about/The_Cherry_Orchard.html?id=Xq_uX8aJqLwC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&hl=en&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
  • Coptseva, N. P. (2008). “A.P. Chekhov as a Philosopher: «Game» Phenomenon and «Existence in the Face of Death» in his Dramas”. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 1, 22-38.
  • Frayn, M. (1978). “The Cherry Orchard”. Anton Chekhov: Plays (London, 1988), 284
  • Golomb, & Karin H. (1988 ). “Onstage and Offstage in Chekov’s Plays: The Question of boundary Penetrability”. Space and Boundaries in Literature. München, 124-130
  • Grevtsova, E. S. (2014). “Philosophic Content of Anton Chekhov's Work”. Rudn Journal Of philosophy (1), 59-63 https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11737
  • Guillemette, L., & Josiane C. (2006). Deconstruction and Différance. Signo. Université du Québec à Trois- Rivières. 1-6.
  • Hendricks, G. P. (2016). Deconstruction the end of writing: “Everything is a text, there is nothing outside context.” Verbum et Ecclesia, 37(1). 1-9 https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v37i1.1509
  • Kataev, V. (2004). Chekhov Plius. Predshestvenniki, Sovremenniki: Preemniki
  • Khezerloo, R., & Marry, W. (2010). Winking at Derrida: The Happy Union of Deconstruction and Feminism. Urmia University. 123-137
  • Klimenko, S. O. (2001). Anton Chekhov and English Nostalgia. Orbis Litterarum, 56(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0730.2001.d01-38.
  • Leone, A. (2000). The Missing Set: How Landscape Acts in The Cherry Orchard. Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature, 24(2), https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.148
  • Papadelos, P. (2007). Derridean Deconstruction and Feminism: Exploring Aporias in Feminist Theory and Practice. Adelaide University, Doctoral Dissertation. 1-203
  • Pavis, P. (1988). “Textual Mechanisms in The Cherry Orchard”. Assaph: Studies in the Theatre, Visual and Performing Arts, 4, 1-18
  • Price, A. (2018). “An Analysis of Key Ideas of Deconstruction through Frantz Kafka’s ‘Metamorphosis’”. Fields: Journal of Huddersfield Student Research, 4(1), 116- 130 https://doi.org/10.5920/fields.2018.0
  • Tulloch, J. (1980). Chekhov: A Structuralist Study. Macmillan Press https://www.amazon.com/Chekhov- Structuralist-Study-John-Tulloch/dp/006497027
  • Wang, R., & Tian, Y. (2016). Between Good and Evil: Deconstructive Interpretation of Noon Wine. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 80-84 https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n11p8
  • Yakin, H. S. M., & Totu, A. (2014). The Semiotic Perspectives of Peirce and Saussure: A Brief Comparative Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 4–8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.247

References

  • Bartlett, J. (2005). Freedom and Self- Knowledge in the Dramatic Works of Anton Chekhov. University of Missouri, Columbia, Doctoral Dissertation. 1-29 https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/4229
  • Bera, K. (2013). “Anton Chekhov and the Theatre of the Absurd”. Lapis Lazuli: An International Literary Journal (LLILJ), 3(1), 1-8
  • Bertens, H. (2013). Literary Theory: The Basics (3rd ed.). Routledge https://www.routledge.com/Literary-Theory-The-Basics/Bertens/p/book/9780415538077
  • Borny, G. (2006). Interpreting Chekhov. The Australian National University Press https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbjpn
  • Chekov, A. (2015). The Cherry Orchard: A Comedy in Four Acts. 1-16 https://books.google.com.pk/books/about/The_Cherry_Orchard.html?id=Xq_uX8aJqLwC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&hl=en&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
  • Coptseva, N. P. (2008). “A.P. Chekhov as a Philosopher: «Game» Phenomenon and «Existence in the Face of Death» in his Dramas”. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 1, 22-38.
  • Frayn, M. (1978). “The Cherry Orchard”. Anton Chekhov: Plays (London, 1988), 284
  • Golomb, & Karin H. (1988 ). “Onstage and Offstage in Chekov’s Plays: The Question of boundary Penetrability”. Space and Boundaries in Literature. München, 124-130
  • Grevtsova, E. S. (2014). “Philosophic Content of Anton Chekhov's Work”. Rudn Journal Of philosophy (1), 59-63 https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11737
  • Guillemette, L., & Josiane C. (2006). Deconstruction and Différance. Signo. Université du Québec à Trois- Rivières. 1-6.
  • Hendricks, G. P. (2016). Deconstruction the end of writing: “Everything is a text, there is nothing outside context.” Verbum et Ecclesia, 37(1). 1-9 https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v37i1.1509
  • Kataev, V. (2004). Chekhov Plius. Predshestvenniki, Sovremenniki: Preemniki
  • Khezerloo, R., & Marry, W. (2010). Winking at Derrida: The Happy Union of Deconstruction and Feminism. Urmia University. 123-137
  • Klimenko, S. O. (2001). Anton Chekhov and English Nostalgia. Orbis Litterarum, 56(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0730.2001.d01-38.
  • Leone, A. (2000). The Missing Set: How Landscape Acts in The Cherry Orchard. Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature, 24(2), https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.148
  • Papadelos, P. (2007). Derridean Deconstruction and Feminism: Exploring Aporias in Feminist Theory and Practice. Adelaide University, Doctoral Dissertation. 1-203
  • Pavis, P. (1988). “Textual Mechanisms in The Cherry Orchard”. Assaph: Studies in the Theatre, Visual and Performing Arts, 4, 1-18
  • Price, A. (2018). “An Analysis of Key Ideas of Deconstruction through Frantz Kafka’s ‘Metamorphosis’”. Fields: Journal of Huddersfield Student Research, 4(1), 116- 130 https://doi.org/10.5920/fields.2018.0
  • Tulloch, J. (1980). Chekhov: A Structuralist Study. Macmillan Press https://www.amazon.com/Chekhov- Structuralist-Study-John-Tulloch/dp/006497027
  • Wang, R., & Tian, Y. (2016). Between Good and Evil: Deconstructive Interpretation of Noon Wine. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 80-84 https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n11p8
  • Yakin, H. S. M., & Totu, A. (2014). The Semiotic Perspectives of Peirce and Saussure: A Brief Comparative Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 4–8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.247

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Iqbal, I., Naeem, A., & Shaheen, M. M. A. (2022). Exploring In-Betweenness after the Loss of Transcendental Signifier and Reversal of Binary Roles in Anton Chekov's The Cherry Orchard. Global Regional Review, VII(II), 284-290. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2022(VII-II).27

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Iqbal, Irum, Ahmad Naeem, and Muhammad Mahmood Ahmad Shaheen. 2022. "Exploring In-Betweenness after the Loss of Transcendental Signifier and Reversal of Binary Roles in Anton Chekov's The Cherry Orchard." Global Regional Review, VII (II): 284-290 doi: 10.31703/grr.2022(VII-II).27

HARVARD

    HARVARD : IQBAL, I., NAEEM, A. & SHAHEEN, M. M. A. 2022. Exploring In-Betweenness after the Loss of Transcendental Signifier and Reversal of Binary Roles in Anton Chekov's The Cherry Orchard. Global Regional Review, VII, 284-290.

MHRA

    MHRA : Iqbal, Irum, Ahmad Naeem, and Muhammad Mahmood Ahmad Shaheen. 2022. "Exploring In-Betweenness after the Loss of Transcendental Signifier and Reversal of Binary Roles in Anton Chekov's The Cherry Orchard." Global Regional Review, VII: 284-290

MLA

    MLA : Iqbal, Irum, Ahmad Naeem, and Muhammad Mahmood Ahmad Shaheen. "Exploring In-Betweenness after the Loss of Transcendental Signifier and Reversal of Binary Roles in Anton Chekov's The Cherry Orchard." Global Regional Review, VII.II (2022): 284-290 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Iqbal, Irum, Naeem, Ahmad, and Shaheen, Muhammad Mahmood Ahmad (2022), "Exploring In-Betweenness after the Loss of Transcendental Signifier and Reversal of Binary Roles in Anton Chekov's The Cherry Orchard", Global Regional Review, VII (II), 284-290

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Iqbal, Irum, Ahmad Naeem, and Muhammad Mahmood Ahmad Shaheen. "Exploring In-Betweenness after the Loss of Transcendental Signifier and Reversal of Binary Roles in Anton Chekov's The Cherry Orchard." Global Regional Review VII, no. II (2022): 284-290. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2022(VII-II).27