References

• Armendariz, C. N. (2017). Thematic analysis of the Excel Pre-Collegiate Program as an avenue of successful postsecondary enrollment for Latina/o students, A. 2000-2019-CSU Theses and Dissertations.
• Attride & Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
• Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription, 19(2), 328-335.
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77- 101.
• Chrisman, J. J., Hynes, T., & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary. Journal of business venturing, 10(4), 267-281.
• Clark, B. R. (1998). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response. Tertiary Education and management, 4(1), 5-16.
• Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. Elsevier Science Regional Sales, 665 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010 (paperback: ISBN-0-08-0433545; hardcover: ISBN-0-08-0433421, $27)..
• Despres, C., & Chauvel, D. (2000). A thematic analysis of the thinking in knowledge management. Knowledge Horizons: The Present and the Promise of Knowledge Management. Butterworth-Heinemann
• Devers, K., & Frankel, R. (2000). Study design in qualitative research-2: Sampling and data collection strategies. Education for health, 13(2), 263-271.
• Dill, D. D. (1995). University-industry entrepreneurship: the organization and management of American university technology transfer units. Higher education, 29(4), 369-384.
• Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21(2-3), 198-233.
• Etzkowitz, H. (2007, May). University-industry-government: The triple helix model of innovation. In Proceedings of 51-st EOQ Congress). Prague: European Organization of Quality. http://triplehelix. stanford. edu/Etzkowitz_pubs.
• Eun, J. H., Lee, K., & Wu, G. (2006). Explaining the
• Farsi, J. Y., Imanipour, N., & Salamzadeh, A. (2012). Entrepreneurial university conceptualization: case of developing countries. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 4(2), 193-204.
• Gartner, W. B. (1988).
• Guarte, J. M., & Barrios, E. B. (2006). Estimation under purposive sampling. Communications in StatisticsSimulation and Computation, 35(2), 277-284.
• Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research policy, 38(6), 922- 935.
• Kreusel, N., Roth, N., & Brem, A. (2018). European business venturing in times of digitisation-an analysis of for-profit business incubators in a triple helix context. International Journal of Technology Management, 76(1-2), 104-136.
• Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and public policy, 23(5), 279-286.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for program evaluation, 1986(30), 73-84.
• Liu, Y., & Huang, Q. (2018). University capability as a micro-foundation for the Triple Helix model: The case of China. Technovation, 76, 40-50.
• McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global qualitative nursing research, 2, 2333393615597674.
• Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. (2010). What are business models? Developing a theory of performative representations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133.
• Stal, E., Andreassi, T., & Fujino, A. (2016). The role of university incubators in stimulating academic entrepreneurship. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(2), 89-98.
• Thornton, P. H., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2011). Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: An overview. International small business journal, 29(2), 105-118.
• Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and applications, 5, 147-158.
• Williams, L. D., & Woodson, T. S. (2012). The future of innovation studies in less economically developed countries. Minerva, 50(2), 221-237.