References

• Abdi, R. (2002). Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies, 4, 139- 145.
• Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 288-297.
• Adams, H., & Quintana-Toledo, E. (2013). Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 8, 13-22.
• Ahmad, U., & Mehrjooseresht, M. (2012). Stance adverbials in engineering thesis abstracts. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 29-36.
• Ansarin, A. A., & Aliabdi, H. T. (2011). Reader Engagement in English and Persian applied linguistics articles. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 154.
• Anthony, L. (2011). Antconc (Version 3.2.4). Tokyo, Japan: Laurence Anthony, University of Waseda.
• Azher, M. & Mehmood, A. (2016). Exploring new discourses of Pakistani academic writing: A Multidimensional Analysis. Science international, 28(4), 245-254
• Azher, M. & Mehmood, A. (2016). Exploring Linguistic Variation across Pakistani Academic Writing: A Multidimensional Analysis, Journal of Critical Inquiry, 14(2), NUML.
• Azher&Mehmood, (2016). Comparing Linguistic Features of Academic Discourse in Pakistani and British English, Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2) GCU, Faisalabad.
• Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116.
• Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press.
• Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse processes, 11(1), 1-34.
• Biber, D. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Blagojević, S. (2009). Expressing attitudes in academic research articles written by English and Serbian authors, Linguistics and Literature. 7(1), 63-73.
• Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93-124.
• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman
• Chafe, W. L., & Nichols, J. (Eds.). (1986). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
• Charles, M. (2006). The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492-518.
• Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (1999). Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. English for specific purposes, 13(3), 239-256.
• Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of second language writing, 13(2), 133-151.
• Hyland, K. (2014). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research article. In Candlin, C. N., & Hyland, K. (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99-121). Routledge: Taylor & Francis.
• Hyland, K. (2011). 10 Disciplines and Discourses: Social Interactions in the Construction of Knowledge. Writing in knowledge societies. Perspectives on writing, 193-214.
• McGrath, L., & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 161-173.
• Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1989). Language has a heart. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 9(1), 7-26.
• Palmer, F. (1979). Modality and the English modals. New York: Longman.
• Sayah, L., & Hashemi, M. R. (2014). Exploring Stance and Engagement Features in Discourse Analysis Papers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(3), 593-601.