References

• Agbatogun, A. O. (2014). Developing Learners' Second Language Communicative Competence through Active Learning: Clickers or Communicative Approach Educational Technology & Society, 17 (2), 257-269.
• Ahmad, S., & Rao, C. (2013). Applying Communicative Approach in Teaching English as a Foreign Language: a Case Study of Pakistaner. Porta Linguarum: revistainternacional de didáctica de las lenguasextranjeras(20), 187-203
• Ahn, H. (2012). Teaching writing skills based on a genre approach to L2 primary school students: An action research. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 2.
• Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., &Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685-730.
• Bacha, N. N. (2002). Developing learners' academic writing skills in higher education: A study for educational reform. Language and Education, 16(3), 161-177.
• Bahumaid (2012). The Communicative Approach in EFL Contexts Revisited: International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 2, No. 6, November 2012.
• Baker, W. P., Barstack, R., Clark, D., Hull, E., Goodman, B., Kook, J., et al. (2008). Writing-to-learn in the inquiry-science classroom: Effective strategies from middle school science and writing teachers. The Clearing House, 81(3), 105 - 108.
• Baleghizadeh, S. (2010). FOCUS ON FORM IN AN EFL COMMUNICATIVE CLASSROOM. NovitasRoyal, 4(1).
• Ballman, T.L., Liskin- Gasparro, J.B., & Mandell, T. B. (2001). The communicative classroom. Boston. AATSP/Heinle.
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 74(1), 29- 58.
• Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). Using wiki to promote collaborative learning in statistics education. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1, 1-18.
• Brown, H.D. (2001) Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman
• Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J., & Hand, B. M. (2006). Implementing the science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(7), 1032.
• Cacciatore, K. L., &Sevian, H. (2006). Teaching lab report writing through inquiry: a green chemistry stoichiometry experiment for general chemistry. J. Chem. Educ, 83(7), 1039.
• Carter, M., Ferzli, M., & Wiebe, E. (2004). Teaching genre to English first-language adults: A study of the laboratory report. Research in the Teaching of English, 395-419.
• Chang (2011). EFL Teachers' Attitudes toward Communicative Language Teaching in Taiwanese College: Asian EFL Journal of Professional Teaching. Vol.5(3),34-42.
• Chapelle, C., Grabe, W., &Berns, M. S. (1997). Communicative language proficiency: Definition and implications for TOEFL 2000. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
• Cope, B. (2000). Multiliteracies: The beginnings of an idea. I Cope, Bill &Kalantzis, Mary (Red), Multiliteracies. Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London & New York: Routledge.
• Corden, R. (2000). Literacy & learning through talk: Strategies for the primary classroom. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• Cremin, T. (2006). Creativity, uncertainty and discomfort: Teachers as writers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 415-433. doi:10.1080/03057640600866023
• Deiner, L. J., Newsome, D., &Samaroo, D. (2012). Directed self-inquiry: A scaffold for teaching laboratory report writing. journal of chemical education, 89(12), 1511-1514
• Demirezen, M. (2011). The foundations of the communicative approach and three of its applications. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 7(1), 57.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The 2010s Communicative language teaching in the 21st century: The 'principled communicative approach'. Perspectives, 36(2), 33-43.
• Doughty and Long (2003). Principles of Communicative Language Teaching and Task Based Instruction. Retrieved November 9th, 2013, from http: //www. Pearsonhighered com/sample chapter/0131579061.pdf.
• Dunne, J., & Ryan, B. (2012). Learning in the Science Lab: a New Approach. Irish Journal of Academic Practice, 1(1), 2.
• Ellis, R., Taylor, C., & Drury, H. (2006). University student conceptions of learning science through writing. Australian Journal of education, 50, 6-28.
• Eslami-Rasekh, Z., &Valizadeh, K. (2004). Classroom Activities Viewed from Different Perspectives: Learners' Voice and Teachers' Voice. TESL-EJ, 8(3), n3.
• Fageeh, A. I. (2011). EFL learners' use of blogging for developing writing skills and enhancing attitudes towards English learning: An exploratory study. Journal of Language and Literature, 2(1), 31-48.
• Fatima, S. (2012). Teaching Report Writing Skills through Communicative Activities. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(2), 104-109.
• Fazilatfar, M.A., Ilun,M., Chenari, Z. (2017). Impact of Skilled-Based Communicative Approach on Writing Skill of EFL Learner, 9
• Field, A., & Hole, G. (2002). How to design and report experiments. Sage.
• Fitzgerald and Shanahan (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development: Taylor & Francis.
• Friginal, E. (2013). Developing research report writing skills using corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 32(4), 208-220.
• Fulwiler, B. (2008). Writing in science: How to scaffold instruction to support learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Gilmore, A. (2011).
• Goldbort, R. C. (2001). Scientific writing as an art and as a science. Journal of environmental health, 63(7), 22.
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York.
• Graham, S., &Perin, D. (2007). Writing Next-Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools
• Griffith, N. (2006). 100 ideas for teaching language, New York: Continuum
• Gunel, M., Hand, B., & McDermott, M. (2009). Writing for different audiences: Effects on high-school students' conceptual understanding of biology. Learning and Instruction, 19, 354 - 367.
• Hammond, M. (2000). Communication within on-line forums: the opportunities, the constraints and the value of a communicative approach. Computers & Education, 35(4), 251-262.
• Han, Z. H. (2002). Rethinking the role of corrective feedback in communicative language teaching. RELC Journal, 33(1), 1-34.
• Hardman, F., Smith, F., & Wall, K. (2003). 'Interactive Whole Class Teaching' in the National Literacy Strategy. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(2), 197-215.
• Harmer, Jeremy (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching(3rd ed.). London: www.longman.com.
• Harmer, J. (2006). How to teach writing. Pearson Education India.
• Hefferman, N. (2006). An integrated approach to teaching academic writing. Asian EFL Journal, 8 I 3, art. 12.
• Hiep, P. H. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Unity within diversity. ELT Journal, 61(3), 193-201
• Hirano, J. (2010). The importance of learning and teaching communicative writing: To end the primacy battle between writing and speaking.
• Hoffa, D. W. (2006). Synopsis laboratory reports: Effects on student learning and curricular benefits.
• Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 93-105.
• Huyen, N. T. T., &Nga, K. T. T. (2003). Learning vocabulary through games. Asian EFL Journal, 5(4), 90-105.
• Hyland, K. (2003b). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
• Hyland, Ken; The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, First Edition, edited by Brian Paltridge& Sue Starfield, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2013.
• Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of second language writing, 16(3), 148-164
• Indrisano, R., &Paratore, J. (Eds.). (2005). Learning to write and writing to learn: Theory and research in practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Jeffery, J. V. (2009). Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability. Assessing Writing, 14(1), 3-24.
• Jensen, W., & Fischer, B. (2005). Teaching technical writing through student peer-evaluation. Journal of technical writing and communication, 35(1), 95-100.
• Jin, G. (2009). Application of communicative approach in college English teaching. Asian Social Science, 4(4), 81.
• Johnstone, K. M., Ashbaugh, H., & Warfield, T. D. (2002). Effects of repeated practice and contextual-writing experiences on college students' writing skills. Journal of educational psychology, 94(2), 305.
• Kalanzadeh, G. A., &Bakhtiarvand, M. (2011). Perceived problems in using communicative language teaching (CLT) by EFL Iranian teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Payame Noor University of Andimeshk, Andimeshk, Iran.
• Kaplan, A. (2008). Clarifying metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: What's the purpose? Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 477-484.
• Kelly, G., Regev, J., & Prothero, W. (2008). Analysis of lines of reasoning in written argumentation. In S. Erduran& M. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 137 - 157). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
• Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of research in science teaching, 37(7), 676-690.
• Khan, R., Ali, S., Dilruba, R., & Fatima, N. (2015). Comparative Studies of the Effectiveness of Communicative and Structural Approach for Teaching English Language. Journal of Policy Research (JPR), 1(2), 67- 71.
• Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., &Hweken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136 - 160.
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000) Techniques and principles in language teaching, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Lerner, N. (2007). Laboratory lessons for writing and science. Written communication, 24(3), 191-222.
• Liao, X. Q. (2000). Communicative Language Teaching Innovation in China: Difficulties and Solutions.
• Likaj, M. (2015). Teaching Writing through Communicative Approach in Military English. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(20), 102-107
• Littlewood, W. (2007). Developing a Context-Sensitive Pedagogy for Communication -Oriented Language Teaching. Retrieved October 6th, 2013, from http://Koreatesol.org/sites/default/files/pdf/Littlewood Teaching English PDF.pdf.
• Martinez, Alejandro. (Karen's Linguistic Issues, February 2002) Authentic Materials: An Overview.
• Merino, B. J., & Hammond, L. (2002). Writing to learn: Science in the upper-elementary bilingual classroom. Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power, 227-243.
• Messenheimer, T., & Packwood, A. (2002). Writing: the state of the state vs. the state of the art in English and American schools. Literacy, 36(1), 11-15.
• Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning Making In Secondary Science Classrooms. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• Moskovitz, C., & Kellogg, D. (2011). Inquiry-based writing in the laboratory course. Science, 332(6032), 919- 920.
• Muhammad, Z. (2016). Pakistani Government Secondary Schools Students' Attitudes towards Communicative Language Teaching and Grammar Translation in Quetta, Balochistan. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 258.
• Musthafa, B. (2015). Communicative language teaching in Indonesia: Issues of theoretical assumptions and challenges in the classroom practice. TEFLIN Journal, 12(2), 184-193.
• National Writing Project & Nagin, C. (2003). Because writing matters: Improving student writing in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Neeley, T. (2012). Global business speaks English. Harvard Business Review, 90(5), 116-124.
• Newton, J. (2009). A place for
• NorouziLarsari, V. (2011). Learners' communicative competence in English as a foreign language (EFL). Journal of English and literature, 2(7), 161-165.
• Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based language teaching: Ernst KlettSprachen
• Oliver, R., &vanderford, S. (2012). Evidence of English language proficiency and academic achievement of nonEnglish-speaking background students. Higher education research and development, 31 , 541-555.
• Prain, V. (2006). learning from writing in secondary science: Some theoretical and practical implications. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 179 - 201.
• Prasad, B. B. N. (2013). Communicative Language Teaching in 21st Century ESL Classroom. English for Specific Purposes World, 14(40), 1-8.
• Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. Handbook of writing research, 54-66.
• Rahman, T. (2007).Denizens of alien worlds a study of education, inequality, and polarization in Pakistan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ranawake, G. S., & Wilson, K. (2016). Learning to do science: lessons from a discourse analysis of students' laboratory reports. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (formerly CAL-laborate International), 24(2).
• Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative language teaching today. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
• Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T.S.(2001) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Samimy,
• Riordan, D. G., & Pauley, S. E. (2003). Technical Report Writing Today-[Book Review]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46(1), 75-76.
• Rivard, L. P.; Straw, S. B. Sci. Educ. 2000, 84, 566-593.
• Roberts, J. T. (2009). The communicative approach to language teaching: The king is dead! Long live the king!. International Journal of English Studies, 4(1), 1-37.
• Sageev, P., &Romanowski, C. J. (2001). A message from recent engineering graduates in the workplace: Results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 685-693.
• Salem, M. S. A.-S. (2007). The effect of journal writing on written performance, writing apprehension, and attitudes of Egyptian English majors. The Pennsylvania State University.
• Samiullah, M. (2015). Development of Creative writing Through Communicative Approach At Secondary Level. University of Punjab: Unpublished Thesis
• Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643-670.
• Sarfraz, S., Mansoor, Z., & Tariq, R. (2015). Teachers' and students' perceptions of the communicative language teaching methodology in the CALL environment: A case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 730-736.
• Saul, E. W. (Ed.). (2004). Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
• Savignon, S. J. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching. In K. Brown( Ed.), Language and Linguistics ( 2nd ed.), (pp. 673-679). London: Elsevier.
• Shanahan, T. (2004). Overcoming the dominance of communication: Writing to think and to learn. In T.L. Jetton & J.A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 59-74). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Siddiqui, S. (2007). Rethinking education in Pakistan: Perceptions, practices, and possibilities. Paramount Publishing Enterprise.
• Sidek, H. M. (2012). EFL Reading Instruction: Communicative Task-Based Approach. Online Submission, 5(2), 109-128.
• Silva, T., & Matsuda, P.K., (2002). An introduction to applied linguistics, NorbertSchmitt(ed.), 251-266. London: Arnold.
• Tilstra, L. (2001). Using journal articles to teach writing skills for laboratory reports in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(6), 762.
• Troia, G. A., & Graham, S. (2002). The effectiveness of a highly explicit, teacher-directed strategy instruction routine: Changing the writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(4), 290-305.
• Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
• Van Bramer, S. E., &Bastin, L. D. (2013). Using a progressive paper to develop students' writing skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(6), 745-750.
• Walker, J. P., & Sampson, V. (2013). Argument-driven inquiry: Using the laboratory to improve undergraduates' science writing skills through meaningful science writing, peer-review, and revision. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(10), 1269-1274
• Wallace, C. S., Hand, B. B., &Prain, V. (2004). Writing and learning in the science classroom (Vol. 23). Springer Science & Business Media.
• Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). The 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
• Whelan, R. J., &Zare, R. N. (2003). Teaching effective communication in a writing-intensive analytical chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(8), 904.