EFFECT OF THE TECHNOLOGY SUPPORTED LEARNING ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-II).30      10.31703/grr.2019(IV-II).30      Published : Jun 2
Authored by : AsmaAfzal , MartinThomas

30 Pages : 280-289

References

  • Ahuja, M. K., & Thatcher, J. B. (2005). Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use.MIS quarterly,29(3), 427-459
  • Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigating the effect of learning styles in a blended e-learning system: An extensionof the technology acceptance model (TAM).Australasian Journalof Educational Technology,33(2).
  • Alshareef, M. A. (2013). Evaluate student satisfaction for social learning network at King Abdulaziz University.Advances in Internet of Things,3(03), 41
  • Aydin, S. (2013). Teachers' perceptions about the use of computers in EFL teaching and learning: the case of Turkey.Computer Assisted Language Learning,26(3), 214-233
  • Bashir, S., Mahmood, K., & Shafique, F. (2016). Internet use among university students: a survey in University of the Punjab, Lahore.Pakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries (PJIM&L),9(1
  • Blanchard, M. R., LePrevost, C. E., Tolin, A. D., & Gutierrez, K. S. (2016). Investigating technology-enhanced teacher professional development in rural, high-povertymiddleschools.Educational researcher,45(3), 207-220
  • Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creatingtwenty-first-century self-determined learners. InThe future of ubiquitous learning(pp. 25-40). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
  • Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2017). Rethinking the relationshipbetween pedagogy, technology and learning in health and physical education.Sport, education and society,22(2), 288-304
  • Cox, K. A. (2019).Research Design and Methods: An Applied Guide for the Scholar-Practitioner, 51
  • Cronjé, J. (2018). Towards a Model for Assessment in an Information and Technology-Rich 21st Century Learning Environment. Occasional Paper# 37.National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
  • Cuellar-Moreno, M. (2016). Effects of the command and mixed styles on student learning in primary education.Journal of Physical Education and Sport,16(4), 1159
  • Davidson, M. R., Fields, M. K., & Yang, J. (2009). A randomized trial study of a preschoolliteracy curriculum: The importance of implementation.Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness,2(3), 177-208
  • Desjardins, R. (2011). Facebook me!: Initial insights in favour of using social networking as a tool for translator training.Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series-Themes in Translation Studies, (10)
  • Durodolu, O. O. (2016). Technology acceptance model asa predictor of using information system'to acquire information literacy skills.Library Philosophy and Practice
  • Frigaard, J. L. (2002). Next-generation: Education technology versus the lecture. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(4), 12-22
  • Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching methods and students' academic performance.InternationalJournal of Humanities and Social Science Invention,2(9), 29-35.
  • Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). Closing the gaps-Improving literacy and mathematics by ICT-enhanced collaboration.Computers & Education,99, 68-80
  • Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2017). Advantages of Using Computer in Teaching English Pronunciation.International Journal of Reseach in English Education, 78-85
  • Haas, M. (2005). Teaching methods for secondary algebra: A meta-analysis of findings.NasspBulletin,89(642), 24-46
  • Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T.(2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills.Teachers and Teaching,23(1), 25-41
  • Healey, D. (2018). TESOL technology standards.The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-6.
  • Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobiletechnology-enhancedflipped classroom with effective learning strategies.Journal of Computers in Education,2(4), 449-473
  • Jamil, B. R. (2009, August). Curriculum reforms in Pakistan-a glass half full or half empty?. InSeminar on School Curriculum Policies and Practices in South Asian Countries, NCERT Delhi, India(pp. 10-12
  • Khokhar, A. J., Gulab, F., & Javaid, S. (2017). Information Communication Technology Integration:Trained Secondary School Teachers' Dilemma.Journal of Research in Social Sciences,5(1), 94.
  • Kremer, M., Brannen, C., & Glennerster, R. (2013). The challenge of education and learning in the developing world.Science,340(6130), 297-300
  • Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science:a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiersin Psychology, 4, 1-12. [863]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
  • Laurillard, D. (2013).Teaching as a design science:Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge
  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2015). Mediating variable. InInternational Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition(pp. 64-69). Elsevier Inc
  • Mahmood, A. S., Khattak, N., Haq, N., & Umair, S. (2018). Technology Integration and Upgradation of Higher Secondary Education: Need of the Hour in Pakistan.InHandbook of Research on Mobile Devices and Smart Gadgets in K-12 Education(pp. 115-133). IGI Global
  • Pourhosein Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. B. (2017). Advantages of using computer in teaching English pronunciation.International Journal of Research in English Education,2(3), 78-85
  • Prensky, M. R. (2010).Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Corwin Press
  • Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations.Computers in Human Behavior,63, 604-61
  • Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M 2: Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-Year-Olds.HenryJ. Kaiser Family Foundation
  • Rikhye, R., Cook, S., & Berge, Z. L. (2009). Digital natives vs. digital immigrants: Myth or reality.International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning,6(2), 3-10
  • Rodriguez, M., Peterson, R. M., & Ajjan, H. (2015). CRM/social media technology: impact on customer orientation process and organizational sales performance. InIdeas in Marketing: Finding the New and Polishing the Old(pp. 636-638). Springer, Cham
  • Sadeghi, S., Pouretemad, H. R., Khosrowabadi, R., Fathabadi, J., & Nikbakht, S. (2018). Impact of Using Digital Devices on the Health of Children: A Systematic Review.J Educ Community Health,5(2), 62-7
  • Sedgwick, P. (2012). Parametric v non-parametric statistical tests.Bmj,344, e1753
  • Shin, W.S., & Kang, M. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at an online university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement.International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,16(3), 110-130
  • Stronge, J. H. (2018).Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD
  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successfule Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction.Computers & education,50(4), 1183-1202
  • Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis.Computers & Education,94, 252-275.
  • Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers' computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model.Journal of computer assisted learning,24(2), 128-143
  • Thode, H. C. (2002).Testing for normality(Vol. 164). CRC press's
  • Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2018).Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons
  • Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Prestridge, S., Albion, P., & Edirisinghe, S. (2016). Responding to challenges in teacher professional development for ICT integration in education.Educational Technology and Society,19(3), 110-120
  • Tremayne, M. (2008). Manipulating interactivity with thematically hyperlinked news texts: a media learning experiment.New Media & Society,10(5), 703-727.
  • Uluyol,Ç., & Şahin, S. (2016). Elementary school teachers' ICT use in the classroom and their motivators for using ICT.British Journal of Educational Technology,47(1), 65-75
  • Wilkins, S., & Stephens Balakrishnan,M. (2013). Assessing student satisfaction in transnational higher education.International Journal of Educational Management,27(2), 143-156.
  • Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technologyacceptance.Information systems research,16(1), 85-102
  • Yang, P. (2018). A Life Journal into the Future: Development of a storytelling approachfor establishing career identity and agency in career counselling.Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-1
  • Ahuja, M. K., & Thatcher, J. B. (2005). Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use.MIS quarterly,29(3), 427-459
  • Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigating the effect of learning styles in a blended e-learning system: An extensionof the technology acceptance model (TAM).Australasian Journalof Educational Technology,33(2).
  • Alshareef, M. A. (2013). Evaluate student satisfaction for social learning network at King Abdulaziz University.Advances in Internet of Things,3(03), 41
  • Aydin, S. (2013). Teachers' perceptions about the use of computers in EFL teaching and learning: the case of Turkey.Computer Assisted Language Learning,26(3), 214-233
  • Bashir, S., Mahmood, K., & Shafique, F. (2016). Internet use among university students: a survey in University of the Punjab, Lahore.Pakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries (PJIM&L),9(1
  • Blanchard, M. R., LePrevost, C. E., Tolin, A. D., & Gutierrez, K. S. (2016). Investigating technology-enhanced teacher professional development in rural, high-povertymiddleschools.Educational researcher,45(3), 207-220
  • Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creatingtwenty-first-century self-determined learners. InThe future of ubiquitous learning(pp. 25-40). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
  • Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2017). Rethinking the relationshipbetween pedagogy, technology and learning in health and physical education.Sport, education and society,22(2), 288-304
  • Cox, K. A. (2019).Research Design and Methods: An Applied Guide for the Scholar-Practitioner, 51
  • Cronjé, J. (2018). Towards a Model for Assessment in an Information and Technology-Rich 21st Century Learning Environment. Occasional Paper# 37.National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
  • Cuellar-Moreno, M. (2016). Effects of the command and mixed styles on student learning in primary education.Journal of Physical Education and Sport,16(4), 1159
  • Davidson, M. R., Fields, M. K., & Yang, J. (2009). A randomized trial study of a preschoolliteracy curriculum: The importance of implementation.Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness,2(3), 177-208
  • Desjardins, R. (2011). Facebook me!: Initial insights in favour of using social networking as a tool for translator training.Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series-Themes in Translation Studies, (10)
  • Durodolu, O. O. (2016). Technology acceptance model asa predictor of using information system'to acquire information literacy skills.Library Philosophy and Practice
  • Frigaard, J. L. (2002). Next-generation: Education technology versus the lecture. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(4), 12-22
  • Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching methods and students' academic performance.InternationalJournal of Humanities and Social Science Invention,2(9), 29-35.
  • Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). Closing the gaps-Improving literacy and mathematics by ICT-enhanced collaboration.Computers & Education,99, 68-80
  • Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2017). Advantages of Using Computer in Teaching English Pronunciation.International Journal of Reseach in English Education, 78-85
  • Haas, M. (2005). Teaching methods for secondary algebra: A meta-analysis of findings.NasspBulletin,89(642), 24-46
  • Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T.(2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills.Teachers and Teaching,23(1), 25-41
  • Healey, D. (2018). TESOL technology standards.The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-6.
  • Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobiletechnology-enhancedflipped classroom with effective learning strategies.Journal of Computers in Education,2(4), 449-473
  • Jamil, B. R. (2009, August). Curriculum reforms in Pakistan-a glass half full or half empty?. InSeminar on School Curriculum Policies and Practices in South Asian Countries, NCERT Delhi, India(pp. 10-12
  • Khokhar, A. J., Gulab, F., & Javaid, S. (2017). Information Communication Technology Integration:Trained Secondary School Teachers' Dilemma.Journal of Research in Social Sciences,5(1), 94.
  • Kremer, M., Brannen, C., & Glennerster, R. (2013). The challenge of education and learning in the developing world.Science,340(6130), 297-300
  • Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science:a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiersin Psychology, 4, 1-12. [863]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
  • Laurillard, D. (2013).Teaching as a design science:Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge
  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2015). Mediating variable. InInternational Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition(pp. 64-69). Elsevier Inc
  • Mahmood, A. S., Khattak, N., Haq, N., & Umair, S. (2018). Technology Integration and Upgradation of Higher Secondary Education: Need of the Hour in Pakistan.InHandbook of Research on Mobile Devices and Smart Gadgets in K-12 Education(pp. 115-133). IGI Global
  • Pourhosein Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. B. (2017). Advantages of using computer in teaching English pronunciation.International Journal of Research in English Education,2(3), 78-85
  • Prensky, M. R. (2010).Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Corwin Press
  • Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations.Computers in Human Behavior,63, 604-61
  • Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M 2: Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-Year-Olds.HenryJ. Kaiser Family Foundation
  • Rikhye, R., Cook, S., & Berge, Z. L. (2009). Digital natives vs. digital immigrants: Myth or reality.International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning,6(2), 3-10
  • Rodriguez, M., Peterson, R. M., & Ajjan, H. (2015). CRM/social media technology: impact on customer orientation process and organizational sales performance. InIdeas in Marketing: Finding the New and Polishing the Old(pp. 636-638). Springer, Cham
  • Sadeghi, S., Pouretemad, H. R., Khosrowabadi, R., Fathabadi, J., & Nikbakht, S. (2018). Impact of Using Digital Devices on the Health of Children: A Systematic Review.J Educ Community Health,5(2), 62-7
  • Sedgwick, P. (2012). Parametric v non-parametric statistical tests.Bmj,344, e1753
  • Shin, W.S., & Kang, M. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at an online university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement.International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,16(3), 110-130
  • Stronge, J. H. (2018).Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD
  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successfule Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction.Computers & education,50(4), 1183-1202
  • Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis.Computers & Education,94, 252-275.
  • Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers' computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model.Journal of computer assisted learning,24(2), 128-143
  • Thode, H. C. (2002).Testing for normality(Vol. 164). CRC press's
  • Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2018).Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons
  • Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Prestridge, S., Albion, P., & Edirisinghe, S. (2016). Responding to challenges in teacher professional development for ICT integration in education.Educational Technology and Society,19(3), 110-120
  • Tremayne, M. (2008). Manipulating interactivity with thematically hyperlinked news texts: a media learning experiment.New Media & Society,10(5), 703-727.
  • Uluyol,Ç., & Şahin, S. (2016). Elementary school teachers' ICT use in the classroom and their motivators for using ICT.British Journal of Educational Technology,47(1), 65-75
  • Wilkins, S., & Stephens Balakrishnan,M. (2013). Assessing student satisfaction in transnational higher education.International Journal of Educational Management,27(2), 143-156.
  • Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technologyacceptance.Information systems research,16(1), 85-102
  • Yang, P. (2018). A Life Journal into the Future: Development of a storytelling approachfor establishing career identity and agency in career counselling.Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-1

Cite this article

    APA : Afzal, A., & Thomas, M. (2019). Effect of the Technology-Supported Learning on the Academic Performance of Secondary School Students. Global Regional Review, IV(II), 280-289. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-II).30
    CHICAGO : Afzal, Asma, and Martin Thomas. 2019. "Effect of the Technology-Supported Learning on the Academic Performance of Secondary School Students." Global Regional Review, IV (II): 280-289 doi: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-II).30
    HARVARD : AFZAL, A. & THOMAS, M. 2019. Effect of the Technology-Supported Learning on the Academic Performance of Secondary School Students. Global Regional Review, IV, 280-289.
    MHRA : Afzal, Asma, and Martin Thomas. 2019. "Effect of the Technology-Supported Learning on the Academic Performance of Secondary School Students." Global Regional Review, IV: 280-289
    MLA : Afzal, Asma, and Martin Thomas. "Effect of the Technology-Supported Learning on the Academic Performance of Secondary School Students." Global Regional Review, IV.II (2019): 280-289 Print.
    OXFORD : Afzal, Asma and Thomas, Martin (2019), "Effect of the Technology-Supported Learning on the Academic Performance of Secondary School Students", Global Regional Review, IV (II), 280-289
    TURABIAN : Afzal, Asma, and Martin Thomas. "Effect of the Technology-Supported Learning on the Academic Performance of Secondary School Students." Global Regional Review IV, no. II (2019): 280-289. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-II).30