References

• Adorno, T. W. (2001). The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture, ed. J.M. Bernstein. New York: Routledge
• Baudrillard, J. (2006). The system of objects. New York: Verso
• Bryant, L. R. (2011a). A logic ofmultiplicities: Deleuze, immanence, and onticology. Anelecta Hermeneutica, (3), ISSN 1918-7351
• Bryant, L. R. (2011b). The ontic principle: Outline of an object oriented ontology. In the speculative turn: continental materialism and realism,eds. Levi Bryant, Nick Srnicek, and Graham Harman (Melbourne: Re. Press, pp. 261-27
• Colfer, Chris. (2013). The Enchantress Returns. Hachette Book Group, In
• Daniel. W. S. (2000). The doctrine of univocity. Deleuze's ontology of immanence. In Deleuze and religion, ed. Mary Bryden, London/New York: Routledge, pp 160
• Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, p. 353
• Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy?, New York: Columbia University Press, 75. Hereafter, WP.)
• Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. M. Lester & C. Stivale (trans.), Constantin V. Boundas (ed.). The Athlonc Press: London. Originally published as loqique Ju Sens © 1969 by Les Kditions de Minuit, Pari
• Deleuze, G. (1992). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. trans. Martin Joughin. New York: Zone Books, 170
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition, trans. Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press, 37
• Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: Essays on a life, trans. Anne Boyman, New York, Urzone
• Deleuze, G. (2004). The method of dramatization. In Desert Islands and Other Texts (19531974), Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), pp. 94-116.
• Drobyshev, V. N. (2015). Plane of immanence and apology of transcendence. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences5(8), 852-863
• Goodchild, P. (2000). Why is philosophy so compromised with God? In Deleuze and Religion, ed. Mary Bryden, London/New York: Routledg
• Griffiths, P. E. & Gray, R. D. (2001).
• Guinnane, D. (2013). Planes of immanence: There is no outside to the text, they read it from within. Retrieved from www.perfomap
• Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
• Lester, M. & Stivale, C. (trans.). (1990). Id. The logic of sense. The Athlone Press, London
• Mackenzie, I., & Porter, R. (2011). Dramatization as method in political theory.Contemporary Political Theory,10(4), 482-501
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press, 2
• Oyama, S. (2001)
• Patton, P. (1997). The world seen from within: Deleuze and the philosophy of events.Theory & Event 1:1, pp. 1-13
• Rodari, G. (1996). The Grammar of fantasy, ed. and trans. Jack Zipes. New York: Teachers and Writers Collaborative.
• Rölli, M. (2004). Immanence and transcendence. Bulletin de la Sociite Amincaine de Philosophie de Langue Franfais, 14 (2). Pp
• Salvadori, M. L. (2002).
• Smith, D. W. (2007). Deleuze and the question of desire: Toward an immanent theory of ethics. Parrhesia, 2, pp. 66-78
• Spindler, F. (2010). Gilles Deleuze: A philosophy of immanence. In (J. Bornemark& H. Ruin, eds.) Phenomenology and Religion: New Frontiers. Sodertorne: Sodertorne University Press. pp. 149-163
• Thiele, K. (2016). Of immanence and becoming: Deleuze and Guattari's philosophy and/as relational ontology, ‘Deleuze, ethics and dramatization (eds. L. Lawlor and A. Wiame), Deleuze Studies10.1, pp. 117-13
• Vaismoradi, M. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, pp. 398-405
• Vig, A. (2010). Deleuze's interpretation of immanence. TÁMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0008 project in New Hungarian Development Plan, supported by the European Union and the European SocialFund
• Zipes, J. (2006). The liberating potential of the fantastic in contemporary fairy tales for children. In Fairy tales and the art of subversion: The classical genre for children and the process of civilization, 2nd. rev. ed. pp.169-192. New York: Routledg
• Zipes, J. (2012). A fairy tale is more than just a fairy tale. Book 2.0, 2 (1 & 2).
• Zourabichvili, F. (2003). Le vocabulaire de Deleuze, Paris: Ellipses, 58